Yep. Boyfriend. Confirmed
Petersen's offense sucks.
But with Oregon it's Awwoyo! All Awwoyo! It's his offense. Not meatball mario! He just wants a TUFF team!!!!
So by what postulate do you know that all coaching dysfunction is the same everywhere. Does the context not vary from situation to situation?
Cristobal is a line coach. He doesn't have some big history as the offensive coordinator guy. You get that with a guy like, say, Spurrier. You get that on the defensive side with a guy like, say, Bob Stoops or Pete Carroll. Guys who have a well-earned track record doing that thing a particular way.
Pete gets the "his offense sucks" tag because it's assumed (I myself have no idea, or care) that he's really pulling the strings for the offense. Cristobal is not assumed to be doing the same, and that seems like a safe assumption.
But, I leave you with this question: why does it matter? Whether the HC does or does not tinker with their coordinators, they are responsible for everything at the end of the day. I can't believe you, of all people, are here whining that Mario doesn't get enough blame. Trust me: if the offense leads them to a 7-4 season, it will fall on Cristoball's desk just as sure as it would fall on Petersen's.
In all of the debates we've had, this is, by far, your weakest position. It shows you more as a Cristo-hater; and not as a reasoned observer who has anything useful to say about him one way or the other.
He's not my boyfriend, so please, critique away. But for Christ's sake bring something to the table.
tldr
Yep. Boyfriend. Confirmed
Petersen's offense sucks.
But with Oregon it's Awwoyo! All Awwoyo! It's his offense. Not meatball mario! He just wants a TUFF team!!!!
Petersen's offense sucks.
But with Oregon it's Awwoyo! All Awwoyo! It's his offense. Not meatball mario! He just wants a TUFF team!!!!
So by what postulate do you know that all coaching dysfunction is the same everywhere. Does the context not vary from situation to situation?
Cristobal is a line coach. He doesn't have some big history as the offensive coordinator guy. You get that with a guy like, say, Spurrier. You get that on the defensive side with a guy like, say, Bob Stoops or Pete Carroll. Guys who have a well-earned track record doing that thing a particular way.
Pete gets the "his offense sucks" tag because it's assumed (I myself have no idea, or care) that he's really pulling the strings for the offense. Cristobal is not assumed to be doing the same, and that seems like a safe assumption.
But, I leave you with this question: why does it matter? Whether the HC does or does not tinker with their coordinators, they are responsible for everything at the end of the day. I can't believe you, of all people, are here whining that Mario doesn't get enough blame. Trust me: if the offense leads them to a 7-4 season, it will fall on Cristoball's desk just as sure as it would fall on Petersen's.
In all of the debates we've had, this is, by far, your weakest position. It shows you more as a Cristo-hater; and not as a reasoned observer who has anything useful to say about him one way or the other.
He's not my boyfriend, so please, critique away. But for Christ's sake bring something to the table.
tldr
How long were you gone after the Auburn loss? Was it two weeks or three
Your boyfriend broke your heart
So after harassing ballz unmercifully you do the same thing and think you get a pass?
Hang with ducks get shot like a duck
CreepyQuook is an honorary duck.