On an article of this magnitude you would think that the Editor-In-Chief might have stuck his nose into the newsroom and asked for a meeting with the reporters. Might have forestalled some shit reporting.“It should never have gotten this far,” admitted Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Joe Barron.
“Our reporters are expected to conduct themselves with integrity.”
Translation: They got caught red-handed lying their asses off and are about to get sued into oblivion.
The outlet is expected to settle Patel’s massive lawsuit before it even reaches discovery — because they know the receipts will destroy them.
Nurse!On an article of this magnitude you would think that the Editor-In-Chief might have stuck his nose into the newsroom and asked for a meeting with the reporters. Might have forestalled some shit reporting.
Editor-in Chief: So tell me about your sources for your story
Reporters: Well, we heard some second hand rumors.
Editor-in Chief: So who told you about these second hand rumors.
Reporters: There is this guy on Hardcore Husky, JW, who posts and seems to have some solid takes on Trump and his administration. We are working on a an article about Trump raping children.
This is gold!So you don't think the editor-in-chief along with the Atlantic attorneys didn't do some after the fact due diligence before retracting the story? Sounds like they have some non-mythical attorneys.
Forget it; he's rollin'.This is gold!
Going down with the ship is old school loyalty. Respect!You're the one that believes the article
Embarrassing
The Atlantic's reporting is sound as always. Few articles have more sources than this one. Why do you feel the need to defend Kash Patel?You're the one that believes the article
Embarrassing
The Atlantic's reporting is sound as always. Few articles have more sources than this one. Why do you feel the need to defend Kash Patel?
The story is obviously bullshit. The Atlantic is a political tabloid that also made up the “losers and suckers” fantasy that was denied by everybody there, including John Bolton, who had no reason to cover for Trump. The National Enquirer of politics with all the unnamed sources.They haven't retracted the fake story. They just should. Changed the headline
The boys here would prefer to avoid that they swallowed the bullshit whole
You’re entertaining little h territory with this stupid post.The Atlantic's reporting is sound as always. Few articles have more sources than this one. Why do you feel the need to defend Kash Patel?
But they have a wonderful track recordThe story is obviously bulllsht. The Atlantic is a political tabloid that also made up the “losers and suckers” fantasy that was denied by everybody there, including John Bolton, who had no reason to cover for Trump.
The Tweet in my OP is as false as the story it references.
But the point, of course, is the story Gasbag is still falling for.Just because they didn't retract it doesn't make it true
Imagine thinking you had a point here
Duck FS FS
Separate issue but yes, it’s just a fake as the story it references. I say “story” because that’s what it is.But the point, of course, is what Gasbag is still falling for.
Then Kash should have no problem taking it to trial.As always?
The only sources on the record deny it
The Atlantic has a horrible track record
This is embarrassing for you