CallMeBigErn
Active poster
Our education system has again failed to teach Everett how sources work.You’re entertaining little h territory with this stupid post.
Who are the sources in the article?
Name them.
Our education system has again failed to teach Everett how sources work.You’re entertaining little h territory with this stupid post.
Who are the sources in the article?
Name them.
Dod you actually read the Tweet on this thread about other “news”services trying to corroborate it? Guess what? They couldn’t, and I’m sure the people close to Patel will be deposed if a judge allows this to proceed.Then Kash should have no problem taking it to trial.
The only sources on the record deny it? You mean Kash denies it? Shocking.
The Daily Wire? Lolz.Dod you actually read the Tweet on this thread about other “news”services trying to corroborate it? Guess what? They couldn’t, and I’m sure the people close to Patel will be deposed if a judge allows this to proceed.
You’ve got some weird glitch with trusting literally everything that confirms your worldview.
My personal system taught me to “put your fucking name on it” or otherwise I don’t believe it. I’ve seen you dismiss negative articles about Dems that are anonymously sourced.Our education system has again failed to teach Everett how sources work.
… and Reuters.The Daily Wire? Lolz.
Our education system has again failed to teach Everett how sources work.
If I’m ever wrong I’ll try to acknowledge it.I'm with Everett. I thought the article was retracted. I was wrong. Things we never get out of our Tugtards. Easy to be a conservative.
Think about what you're saying for a nanosecond. You think this administration would tolerate named sources? They'd be out of a job instantly. Anonymous inside sourcing is the only reason we are able to see inside the veil. That's how it's always been, regardless of administration. This is how political reporting works.My personal system taught me to “put your fucking name on it” or otherwise I don’t believe it. I’ve seen you dismiss articles of Dems that are anonymously sourced.
You’re brainwashed.
You just disappear for a few weeks. That’s how you handle it, O’Keefed.If I’m ever wrong I’ll try to acknowledge it.
Example?Dude, you can say this story is true, but The Atlantic has missed on basically everything the last ten years - on purpose.
As I just said, you have a mental glitch where you automatically believe things that fit into your personal narrative.Think about what you're saying for a nanosecond. You think this administration would tolerate named sources? They'd be out of a job instantly. Anonymous inside sourcing is the only reason we are able to see inside the veil. That's how it's always been, regardless of administration. This is how political reporting works.
Like I said, if the Atlantic made up the story, Kash should have no problem taking it to trial.
And everyone has the same favorite John Waite song.You just disappear for a few weeks. That’s how you handle it, O’Keefed.
I may need a file compressor to post it all.Example?
I liked Don Henley and Bryan Adams more as a kid.And everyone has the same favorite John Waite song.
I trust reports from reputable outlets that are detailed, well-sourced, and clearly not made up. Did you read the article? It's bonkers to think they made this all up.As I just said, you have a mental glitch where you automatically believe things that fit into your personal narrative.
It’s weird.