HHusky
Active poster
So we need to see the tapes to know they are real now?
Yes
New rules, I’ll accept the terms.
Not new for me.
So we need to see the tapes to know they are real now?
Yes
New rules, I’ll accept the terms.
Did Ukraine's president think that Chokin was corrupt?
Did Ukraine's president think that Chokin was corrupt?
Relevance?
And it's Shokin.
Did Ukraine's president think that Chokin was corrupt?
Relevance?
And it's Shokin.
Objection overruled. Answer the question.
Simple question. Did Ukraine have any evidence that Shokin was corrupt?
So if he thought there was no corruption but he fired him anyways just to get the billion dollars, you are fine with that?
So if he thought there was no corruption but he fired him anyways just to get the billion dollars, you are fine with that?
Yes
So if he thought there was no corruption but he fired him anyways just to get the billion dollars, you are fine with that?
Yes
"I don't have the documents."
"I gave the documents back."
"I declassified the documents."
"The documents belong to me."
"I want the documents back."
"[Insert name] had documents too."
"The documents were planted in my boxes."
So if he thought there was no corruption but he fired him anyways just to get the billion dollars, you are fine with that?
Yes
Cool. Just seems weird that a VP would care so deeply about getting rid of a prosecutor that the Ukrainian government seemed to have no issues with. Maybe there's a tape that has the Ukrainian president saying to Biden that Shokin was totally fine.
So if he thought there was no corruption but he fired him anyways just to get the billion dollars, you are fine with that?
Yes
Lemming
So if he thought there was no corruption but he fired him anyways just to get the billion dollars, you are fine with that?
Yes
Cool. Just seems weird that a VP would care so deeply about getting rid of a prosecutor that the Ukrainian government seemed to have no issues with. Maybe there's a tape that has the Ukrainian president saying to Biden that Shokin was totally fine.
Pretending it was merely the VP's position that the guy needed to go now?
So if he thought there was no corruption but he fired him anyways just to get the billion dollars, you are fine with that?
Yes
Cool. Just seems weird that a VP would care so deeply about getting rid of a prosecutor that the Ukrainian government seemed to have no issues with. Maybe there's a tape that has the Ukrainian president saying to Biden that Shokin was totally fine.
Pretending it was merely the VP's position that the guy needed to go now?
Ukraine's president was fine with him.
I wonder if anyone else wanted Shokin to go.https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/10/03/...oed-biden-on-ukraine-reforms-kfile/index.html
I wonder if anyone else wanted Shokin to go.https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2019/10/03/...oed-biden-on-ukraine-reforms-kfile/index.html
How much was their cut of the 10 million we know about. Oh and Hunter was working for the guy paying the bribe...