Witch hunt . . . obviously

I mean, what harm could come from directly meddling in other countries affairs?

Imagine imposing conditions on a billion dollars. Crazy, right?

I believe that's what Trump was impeached for, your rules

For once you're right. ("Find me some dirt on Biden or you'll never see this aid Congress has already approved.")
 
Last edited:
This is the first thing that I could actually see Trump having some problems with. Classified material handling is no joke, and it looks like he bungled it, to some degree. Now, we can all agree (except Mello and HHuksy they see no issue here or course) equal application of the law has been thrown out the window - Hillary and Biden shouldn't get passes if Trump isn't, but that ship has sailed. This is about getting him, and only him, and there are some legal issues here to be worried about if I am Trump.

One curious item is the choice of Miami to bring these charges. That is Trump country in a sense. I have to imagine at least one good old boy MAGAtard makes it on the jury and thus the jury will be hung. It will be must see TV no matter what.

Equating how Biden (and Pence) handled the discovery of classified documents with Daddy's handling and dissemination[/b] of them is ridiculous.

If you believe Hillary's intent was clear enough for prosecution, then you have to believe Daddy's intent is a slam dunk.

Taking it to Miami makes venue a non-issue. Smith doesn't want to fight about venue.

And compare that to Hillary and Biden. Who's intent was to sell nuclear material or access, respectively.

You girls are great at assuming the things you're actually required to prove.
 
"I don't have the documents."

"I gave the documents back."

"I declassified the documents."

"The documents belong to me."

"I want the documents back."

"[Insert name] had documents too."

"The documents were planted in my boxes."

First round knock-out.

Assuming it's all true, please state the (fictional) harm or damage, and why Joe's garage wasn't raided, too?
 
Dazzler never questions why Biden had thousands of docs. A lot of them on Ukraine who paid him 10 million that we know of so far. How many other presidents have 20 something shell companies to launder money through?

All roads lead to Obunghole. Policy decisions were being sold and then came true and only Obama could do that.
 
https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1669125830675513348?s=20

Only morons didn't know that Garland would have to sign off once Smith had completed his work.

And? How does that materially change the overarching point?

You really on the struggle bus today. More than normal.

 
https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1669125830675513348?s=20

Only morons didn't know that Garland would have to sign off once Smith had completed his work.

And? How does that materially change the overarching point?

You really on the struggle bus today. More than normal.

I quoted what I was responding to. Grab a clue . . . but not by the pussy.
 
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1669125830675513348?s=20

Only morons didn't know that Garland would have to sign off once Smith had completed his work.

And? How does that materially change the overarching point?

You really on the struggle bus today. More than normal.

I quoted what I was responding to. Grab a clue . . . but not by the pussy.

Struggle bus. Short bus. All the same to the Dazzler!
 
"House Republicans are demanding increased transparency from President Joe Biden on his personal tax returns after an investigation found one of his corporate entities reported nearly $10 million in revenue without detailing the sources. The president’s critics believe the sudden influx of money may be related to allegations of bribery against the president."
https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/ju...017-tax-return-house-gop-investigating-mstef/

10 million you say? Magic? Sounds tax deductible!
 
This is the first thing that I could actually see Trump having some problems with. Classified material handling is no joke, and it looks like he bungled it, to some degree. Now, we can all agree (except Mello and HHuksy they see no issue here or course) equal application of the law has been thrown out the window - Hillary and Biden shouldn't get passes if Trump isn't, but that ship has sailed. This is about getting him, and only him, and there are some legal issues here to be worried about if I am Trump.

One curious item is the choice of Miami to bring these charges. That is Trump country in a sense. I have to imagine at least one good old boy MAGAtard makes it on the jury and thus the jury will be hung. It will be must see TV no matter what.

Equating how Biden (and Pence) handled the discovery of classified documents with Daddy's handling and dissemination[/b] of them is ridiculous.

If you believe Hillary's intent was clear enough for prosecution, then you have to believe Daddy's intent is a slam dunk.

Taking it to Miami makes venue a non-issue. Smith doesn't want to fight about venue.

And compare that to Hillary and Biden. Who's intent was to sell nuclear material or access, respectively.

You girls are great at assuming the things you're actually required to prove.

Well, we've been right about everything and you're always wrong so fuck off.
 
https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1669125830675513348?s=20

Only morons didn't know that Garland would have to sign off once Smith had completed his work.

And? How does that materially change the overarching point?

You really on the struggle bus today. More than normal.

I quoted what I was responding to. Grab a clue . . . but not by the pussy.

No shit, Sherlock. Answer the question.

 
q4w0bjyp4wfj.jpg
 
https://twitter.com/atensnut/status/1669123190445035520?s=20
The Dim strategy on full display.

Very "shady" to bring cases in the right venue.

What other venue does a far left federal prosecutor need? The demonrat caucus?

All a game comrade.
 
Back
Top