What do you want to bet that this guy also attended an Ivy League Law School

[RaceBannon]

The new standard for federal judges is that they know as much as tug posters

This guy failed that too

Bob C and Sled knew it

H didn't

 

[PurpleThrobber]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Must

Defend

Everything

But TRUMP

Daddy

The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

Guess you didn't know either

Matchbook law school grad

Race pretends he knew the term.

If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.

Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.

Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.

Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

It depends, Madam.

Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.

 

[HHusky]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Must

Defend

Everything

But TRUMP

Daddy

The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

Guess you didn't know either

Matchbook law school grad

Race pretends he knew the term.

If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.

Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.

Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.

Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

It depends, Madam.

Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.

You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?

Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Must

Defend

Everything

But TRUMP

Daddy

The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

Guess you didn't know either

Matchbook law school grad

Race pretends he knew the term.

If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.

Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.

Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.

Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

It depends, Madam.

Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.

You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?

Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.

I'm not a lawyer. And apparently because you can't answer the question, neither are you, poopy pants.

 

[HHusky]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Must

Defend

Everything

But TRUMP

Daddy

The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

Guess you didn't know either

Matchbook law school grad

Race pretends he knew the term.

If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.

Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.

Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.

Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

It depends, Madam.

Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.

You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?

Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.

I'm not a lawyer. And apparently because you can't answer the question, neither are you, poopy pants.

I answered it. My answer was correct.

You just don’t know as much as you think you do, Mildred.

 

[Bob_C]

The new standard for federal judges is that they know as much as tug posters

This guy failed that too

Bob C and Sled knew it

H didn't

We are beating epidemiologists and now federal judge appointees. Also head of the treasury.

Too much winning.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Must

Defend

Everything

But TRUMP

Daddy

The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

Guess you didn't know either

Matchbook law school grad

Race pretends he knew the term.

If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.

Sounds like a great nominee for Judge then.

Yeah he hasn’t memorized all US law. Unlike the rest of the judiciary.

Nominees for judicial positions should be able answer tougher legal questions than "how many people are on a jury?", Dazzler.

Though - how many people are on a jury, Dazzler?

It depends, Madam.

Didn’t ask what adult diapers you’re wearing, misogynist.

You thought you knew, didn’t you lady?

Don’t take it too hard. I still agree with all your takes on Cheetos.

I'm not a lawyer. And apparently because you can't answer the question, neither are you, poopy pants.

I answered it. My answer was correct.

You just don’t know as much as you think you do, Mildred.

Channeling your inner @MelloDawgFS by refusing to answer or use big words.

Fuck off.

Go work on your Russian State narrative homework.

 

[creepycoug]

Being the centrist that I yam, I declare:

1. It’s not a term with same universal recognition as that enjoyed by Miranda such that it can accurately be described by the avg person or even lawyer. Those of us who declined the trial practice don’t remember anything from criminal or con law.

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

Actually, the Ivy League dodges this one. Black eye for Arizona law school IMO.

 

[HHusky]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

 

[pawz]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Losers lose. It’s what they do.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

Or finish your Russian state narrative brief[/s] homework.

 

[HHusky]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

Or finish your Russian state narrative brief[/s] homework.

I know you thought it was 12.

Not always.

Sorry, Mabel.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

Or finish your Russian state narrative brief[/s] homework.

I know you thought it was 12.

Not always.

Sorry, Mabel.

Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought

Still unable to answer the question.

Cereal box top lawyer.

 

[HHusky]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

Or finish your Russian state narrative brief[/s] homework.

I know you thought it was 12.

Not always.

Sorry, Mabel.

Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought

You're not complicated, Delores.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

Or finish your Russian state narrative brief[/s] homework.

I know you thought it was 12.

Not always.

Sorry, Mabel.

Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought

You're not complicated, Delores.

Still can’t answer the question.

Still a cereal box pretend lawyer

 

[HHusky]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

Or finish your Russian state narrative brief[/s] homework.

I know you thought it was 12.

Not always.

Sorry, Mabel.

Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought

You're not complicated, Delores.

Still can’t answer the question.

Still a cereal box pretend lawyer

see what i mean?

 

[pawz]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Why would we taken legal advice from you, Dazzler?

You still didn't answer or explain the jury number question.

Or finish your Russian state narrative brief[/s] homework.

I know you thought it was 12.

Not always.

Sorry, Mabel.

Now you’re a fucking mind reader. You know what I thought

You're not complicated, Delores.

Still can’t answer the question.

Still a cereal box pretend lawyer

see what i mean?

No.

 

[creepycoug]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.

I’ve now officially over-invested in this.

 

[pawz]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.

I’ve now officially over-invested in this[/i][/b].

Big belly laughs in Savery Hall.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

2. I would fully expect a judge or judicial candidate to know precisely what it is and be able to explain it.

I would expect a judicial candidate to know the principle[/b] involved. I doubt there are more than handful of civil practitioners (including judicial candidates) who knew the term "Brady motion" refers to that principle. All the dirty cops know it, apparently.

Of course I wouldn’t know, but something tells me that’s not right.

I’ve now officially over-invested in this.

You can check out any time you want but you can never leave, @creepycoug