What do you want to bet that this guy also attended an Ivy League Law School

[RaceBannon]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Must

Defend

Everything

But TRUMP

Daddy

The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

Guess you didn't know either

Matchbook law school grad

Race pretends he knew the term.

If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.

So you didn't know

Did you get your law license out of a Cracker Jack box?

The alleged qualified federal judge didn't know either

SAD

Did he know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the accused's counsel or not? We'll never know, because the whole point of the exercise was to create gotchas.

He didn't know

Tape don't lie

 

[46XiJCAB]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Must

Defend

Everything

But TRUMP

Daddy

The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

Guess you didn't know either

Matchbook law school grad

Race pretends he knew the term.

If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.

Pretend this is a Trump nominee and STFU.

 

[46XiJCAB]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Must

Defend

Everything

But TRUMP

Daddy

The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

Guess you didn't know either

Matchbook law school grad

Race pretends he knew the term.

If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.

So you didn't know

Did you get your law license out of a Cracker Jack box?

The alleged qualified federal judge didn't know either

SAD

Did he know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the accused's counsel or not? We'll never know, because the whole point of the exercise was to create gotchas.

Withholding tapes from J6 defendants is a Brady violation. It’s been in the news.

Not if you're watching CNN, MSLSD and the rest of the corrupt media like Dazzler.

 

[trublue]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Since you don’t know or practice criminal law, you would make such an ignorant declaration.

Brady motions are pretty standard in criminal cases, you dumbfuck. Every public defender, law school student, investigator et al knows what it is.

Withholding exculpatory evidence in a criminal case prior to trial is a BIG no no.

Let me rephrase your statement: I’m a blowhard and like to blow smoke. What kind of law do you practice again? Business law?

 

[trublue]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Must

Defend

Everything

But TRUMP

Daddy

The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

Guess you didn't know either

Matchbook law school grad

Race pretends he knew the term.

If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Must

Defend

Everything

But TRUMP

Daddy

The girls aren't nominated to be a judge

Guess you didn't know either

Matchbook law school grad

Race pretends he knew the term.

If he didn't know exculpatory evidence has to be shared with the defense, that would be surprising. That he didn't know the defense tool for challenging the prosecution's adherence to that principle is called a "Brady motion", is not that surprising. Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. He's never presided over a criminal case.

Bob gave a correct definition of a “Brady Motion”in the first post of this thread. Your definition is incorrect.

I’ll post a correct definition again to help you out.https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/legal-defenses/brady-motion/

“A Brady motion is a defendant’s request for the prosecution in a criminal case to turn over any potentially exculpatory evidence (which means evidence that may be favorable to the accused).

Defense attorneys generally bring this motion as part of the pretrial process, or later in a case, or when they believe that prosecutors are withholding such information.”

A Brady motion is almost universally part of the pretrial process . . . at least in federal criminal cases.

 

[RaceBannon]

Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law

Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

 

[Sledog]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Good God a law clerk knows this shit! Brady is an every day thing in LE! If an officer holds something back they get a Brady tag from the DA's office and if somehow they keep their job the DA will have nothing to do with any case they are involved in. EVER! It is a career ender either way. They spend their time managing vehicle maintained or counting paper clips.

Not believing the whole I'm an attorney schtick now.

 

[HHusky]

I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero[/b] such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

 

[Sledog]

I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero[/b] such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

Holy shit you had to Google it!

What a dumbfuck!

 

[Bob_C]

I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero[/b] such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

Keep digging.

 

[HHusky]

I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero[/b] such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

Holy shit you had to Google it!

What a dumbfuck!

Bringing facts to a discussion is so unfair, I know. I certainly bow to your vast experience participating in Brady violations, Mall Cop.

 

[HHusky]

Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law[/b]

Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

Is the name or the principle more important?

Don't hurt yourself.

 

[HHusky]

I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero[/b] such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

Keep digging.

"Your mother wears army boots!", cried Bob_C.

 

[SFGbob]

I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero[/b] such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

Keep digging.

"Your mother wears army boots!", cried Bob_C.

If it helped your team you'd let Biden shit in your mouth.

 

[Bob_C]

I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero[/b] such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

Keep digging.

"Your mother wears army boots!", cried Bob_C.

Meltdown

 

[HHusky]

I love it when the girls who didn't go to law school tell me that certain terms are used every day there.

Meanwhile, an all-jurisdiction case search reveals that many US jurisdictions have exactly zero cases (published or unpublished) using the term "Brady motion" while some jurisdictions use the term extensively. (Colorado has zero[/b] such cases, btw. California has hundreds.)

Pulling up a Crim Law text at random just now and doing a word search yielded ZERO hits for "Brady".

It's a gotcha, and not a particularly good one.

Keep digging.

"Your mother wears army boots!", cried Bob_C.

Meltdown

Appreciate your discretion.

Facts are like Kryptonite, of course.

 

[RaceBannon]

Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law[/b]

Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

Is the name or the principle more important?

Don't hurt yourself.

Biden didn't appoint me nor am I a sitting judge but good one I guess

What did I say about your retarded argument?

 

[HHusky]

Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law[/b]

Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

Is the name or the principle more important?

Don't hurt yourself.

Biden didn't appoint me nor am I a sitting judge but good one I guess

What did I say about your retarded argument?

I think avoiding the question was the right move for you.

Can’t be too careful.

 

[RaceBannon]

Biden appoints a judge who doesn't know the law and H is all over posters here about whether they knew the law[/b]

Imagine a so called lawyer making arguments like that

It will only get better as standards are reduced and erased for law school. I mean H allegedly passed law school and the bar 80 years ago. Worse than that

So you didn't know what the term refers to even though "everyone" does, allegedly.

Is the name or the principle more important?

Don't hurt yourself.

Biden didn't appoint me nor am I a sitting judge but good one I guess

What did I say about your retarded argument?

I think avoiding the question was the right move for you.

Can’t be too careful.

What question?

Biden appointed a moron ignorant of the law

I'm not a judge nor did Biden appoint me

Keep chasing that rabbit

 

[pawz]

Fuck, I even know what that is.

Now all the girls are going to pretend that a "Brady motion" is a commonly seen thing and a frequently used term so they can play gotcha along with Senator Kennedy.

It isn't, of course. A majority of Daddy's nominees are thankful Kennedy didn't ask them about it.

Every person that has ever casually followed criminal cases knows what it is.

That is unmitigated bullshit.

Just because you had to google it doesn’t mean I’m wrong.

I actually looked to see how ubiquitous the term is. The answer is, not very.

Bob_C 1, HH 0