To Those Who Think The Huskies Will Start 4-0

[Tailgater]

What the fuck? Have you not watched Sark ball the last 4 years? I'll help you out:

2009

Loss at home to LSU, loss to an average Notre Dame team on the road.

2010

Faceplant to open the season at BYU, curb stomping at home against a good, but ultimately non BCS Nebraska.

2011

We fucking got lucky to hang on against Eastern Washington, played shitty at home against Hawaii, and got boat raced in Lincoln.

2012

Squeaked by SDSU because their coach was a fucktard, got annihilated in Baton Rouge.

Good points, but the slow starts in Sark's first three seasons were obviously due in large part to his defense early in those seasons being the worst any of us had ever seen. Well managed successful programs often must rely on strong defense in early games, especially on the road, until their offenses catch-up. The Husky defense was significantly better last season after Sark's staff purge the previous Winter and early success in 2013 will largely depend on that improvement continuing. The BSU game will show us immediately if that is at all possible. Beyond that, I must take it one week and one game at a time.

 

[dhdawg]

I think we start 4-0 cause that's the only way we get to seven wins, we're not winning vs, Oregon at Stan at OSU at UCLA and at ASU. HTH

Disagree:

Sark always pulls 1-2 victories out of his ass, but gives those same wins away at some point in the year.

But those always come at home, and the only good/top team they have at home is oregon and boise st. I gave him BSU and I'm not giving him Oregon

Disagree

2010 at USC

2011 at Utah (Since Utah won more games that year than Sark ever has in a season it counts)

If your gonna count Utah (who went 7-6 that year BTW) you have a point, IMO Utah was not a quality team and their backup QB was playing that game

 

[greenblood]

I think we start 4-0 cause that's the only way we get to seven wins, we're not winning vs, Oregon at Stan at OSU at UCLA and at ASU. HTH

Disagree:

Sark always pulls 1-2 victories out of his ass, but gives those same wins away at some point in the year.

But those always come at home, and the only good/top team they have at home is oregon and boise st. I gave him BSU and I'm not giving him Oregon

Disagree

2010 at USC

2011 at Utah (Since Utah won more games that year than Sark ever has in a season it counts)

If your gonna count Utah (who went 7-6 that year BTW) you have a point, IMO Utah was not a quality team and their backup QB was playing that game

8-5 actually. But yeah, they weren't that great. But it's still better than anything UW has done with Sark. Also, if many fans think Utah wasn't a quality team, what the fuck does that say about Washington?

 

[[Deleted User]]

I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.

Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front.

 

[MikeDamone]

I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.

Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front.

Can't you just be happy with 4-0? 4-1? 4-2?

The doogs like to ignore an easy front loaded schedule and are giddy over the record. Pointing out the schedule was easy on doogman is likely to get a timeout. Then, when the schedule if much more difficult up front, as was the case in 2012, the are all of a sudden all about the schedule.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.

Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front.

Can't you just be happy with 4-0? 4-1? 4-2?

The doogs like to ignore an easy front loaded schedule and are giddy over the record. Pointing out the schedule was easy on doogman is likely to get a timeout. Then, when the schedule if much more difficult up front, as was the case in 2012, the are all of a sudden all about the schedule.

I am for the players but against the schedule.

 

[Houhusky]

UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0

BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon

@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.

Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.

Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.

 

[RaceBannon]

UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0

BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon

@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.

Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.

Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.

At which point Kim asks how many of you would have taken 4-3 with that schedule? The season has a long way to go.

Fact Checker will say the Huskies are 10-3.

And of course they end up 7-6

 

[[Deleted User]]

UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0

BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon

@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.

Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.

Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.

UW will start either 2-2 or 1-3, cook it. I have all the screenshots I need.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0

BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon

@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.

Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.

Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.

UW will start either 2-2 or 1-3, cook it. I have all the screenshots I need.

You don't have all the screenshots you need yet. You need this one too:

UW will start 0-4 on its way to another well-earned 0-12.

 

[dhdawg]

UW will start 4-0 and will be rolling along quite nicely, then the trip to stanford in which all of Stanford's blue chip offensive lineman will dominant our shitty "diamonds in the ruff" d line, we lose 35-10 thus starting the yearly midseason losing streak, where we get plunger raped at stan, get our brains beaten in vs oregon, and shit the bed in tempe. And we're well on our way to a 7-6 season, except in this one we'll have a losing record in conference

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.

If we did begin two up, two down, then really struggled, I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired. But if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made a great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.

I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired, but if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made it great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work.

I'm still amazed that the REAL football president hasn't fired Pool Boy yet.

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.

I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired, but if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made it great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work.

I'm still amazed that the REAL football president hasn't fired Pool Boy yet.

He doesn't feel like dealing with elitist regents like Gates Sr. and begging for Betsy the librarian's token blessing.

 

[[Deleted User]]

I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.

I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired, but if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made it great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work.

I'm still amazed that the REAL football president hasn't fired Pool Boy yet.

He doesn't feel like dealing with elitist regents like Gates Sr. and begging for Betsy the librarian's token blessing.

why do you guys call Sark Pool Boy?

 

[[Deleted User]]

UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0

BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon

@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.

Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.

Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.

At which point Kim asks what does that asshole Race Bannon and his minions have to say now? After UW is 4-0.

Fixed it up after 4-0.

 

[[Deleted User]]

I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three, wins next two, loses next two, win AC and lose shit tier bowl to finish 7-6.

Will remind everyone of 2011 when the schedule was easy up front.

Can't you just be happy with 4-0? 4-1? 4-2?

The doogs like to ignore an easy front loaded schedule and are giddy over the record. Pointing out the schedule was easy on doogman is likely to get a timeout. Then, when the schedule if much more difficult up front, as was the case in 2012, the are all of a sudden all about the schedule.

Doogs sure are hypocritical cunts aren't they?

Just like in recruiting if a kid UW is after signs elsewhere in June it's met with "awful warm for February". If UW signs a kid in June and you bring up how it's a long ways from signing day you are met with "Kids who commit this early never decommit ever".

 

[dhdawg]

I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.

I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired, but if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made it great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work.

I'm still amazed that the REAL football president hasn't fired Pool Boy yet.

He doesn't feel like dealing with elitist regents like Gates Sr. and begging for Betsy the librarian's token blessing.

why do you guys call Sark Pool Boy?

I'm surprised Faber College Grad hasn't shown up here

 

[DerekJohnson]

I could see 3-1, 4-0, and 2-2 all as realistic.

I'm not going to be the asshole fan who wishes for 5-7 so the coach gets fired, but if that were to happen and pool boy somehow made it great hire.. and say we went 38-10 or something over the next four years, that would work.

I'm still amazed that the REAL football president hasn't fired Pool Boy yet.

He doesn't feel like dealing with elitist regents like Gates Sr. and begging for Betsy Marion the Librarian's token blessing.

ftfy

 

[Steve_Bowman]

Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.

Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton.