To Those Who Think The Huskies Will Start 4-0

  • Thread starter Thread starter [Deleted User]
  • Start date Start date
Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.

Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't this be the season that Tosh lives up to his rep in something other than recruiting? We might see some surprises in who gets to play in the DL........ then again, probably not.

 
Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.

Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't this be the season that Tosh lives up to his rep in something other than recruiting? We might see some surprises in who gets to play in the DL........ then again, probably not.
Click to expand...

Not really fair to Tosh considering this is only his 2nd season. Hell, he only had time to recruit 1 guy to UW in 2012. You can't really judge him until at least after the 2nd year, and he still won't have all of his guys in place.
 
Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.

Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't this be the season that Tosh lives up to his rep in something other than recruiting? We might see some surprises in who gets to play in the DL........ then again, probably not.
Click to expand...

Not really fair to Tosh considering this is only his 2nd season. Hell, he only had time to recruit 1 guy to UW in 2012. You can't really judge him until at least after the 4th year, and he still won't have all of his guys in place.
Click to expand...

 
Tosh hasn't had time.....problem is he never will.

UW will never get elite talent with a head coach that's little more than a glorified/token leader of a frat house, whose primary skills are choreographing dance routines and pulling cool stunts at recruit's houses.

We're really lucky to have the few guys we have that are real football players considering the clown Mr Cream Puff.

Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.

Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't this be the season that Tosh lives up to his rep in something other than recruiting? We might see some surprises in who gets to play in the DL........ then again, probably not.
Click to expand...

Not really fair to Tosh considering this is only his 2nd season. Hell, he only had time to recruit 1 guy to UW in 2012. You can't really judge him until at least after the 2nd year, and he still won't have all of his guys in place.
Click to expand...

 
Last edited:
Tosh hasn't had time.....problem is he never will.

UW will never get elite talent with a head coach that's little more than a glorified/token leader of a frat house, whose primary skills are choreographing dance routines and pulling cool stunts at recruit's houses.

We're really lucky to have the few guys we have that are real football players considering the clown Mr Cream Puff.

Good point about a defense being the strong suit early in the season.

Without proof, I assume our D line sucks. (Donny can't hold it down alone.) I don't beileve at this point we have anyone ready to play that could start on a decent D-1A team but Shelton.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't this be the season that Tosh lives up to his rep in something other than recruiting? We might see some surprises in who gets to play in the DL........ then again, probably not.
Click to expand...

Not really fair to Tosh considering this is only his 2nd season. Hell, he only had time to recruit 1 guy to UW in 2012. You can't really judge him until at least after the 2nd year, and he still won't have all of his guys in place.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Why do you hate Wide Receivers?
 
BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon
Click to expand...

What about the BSU team that beat UW?
Click to expand...

I had a little belly laugh but Sark at home in the first game of the year is different than Sark in an "away" bowl game striving to maintain 7-6
 
What the fuck? Have you not watched Sark ball the last 4 years? I'll help you out:

2009

Loss at home to LSU, loss to an average Notre Dame team on the road.

2010

Faceplant to open the season at BYU, curb stomping at home against a good, but ultimately non BCS Nebraska.

2011

We fucking got lucky to hang on against Eastern Washington, played shitty at home against Hawaii, and got boat raced in Lincoln.

2012

Squeaked by SDSU because their coach was a fucktard, got annihilated in Baton Rouge.

There is no reason to think Boise isn't capable of beating us, handily, to open the season. And just like 2009 Notre Dame and 2010 BYU, they could lay an egg at Illinois. Shit, Arizona's probably due to beat us at Husky Stadium again. Then we have Oregon and Stanford coming up? I'm predicting 2-2 after the first 4 and probably 2-5 after that. FUCK.
Click to expand...
USCWell you are being fucktarded College. A first year head coach just doesn't put the pieces of a Ty Willy team and go on the road and beat. ANY ND team. This was one of Sarks best coaching performances, same with LSU and obviously USC.

I've contended all along the 2009 was Snark's best coaching job and best team. Got repeatedly banned for it by those mushy cunts at fagman. His teams have went downhill since. But to rail on him for 2009 is ignant (they were a 7-6 (except for ND refs and Polk call, saw same thing with Stanford and Stephan Taylor last year, exact!)

and we played pretty fucking well vs Hawaii. 21-zip in 1st quarter and a solid win, showing Sark can make adjustments (although Holtard couldn't). Otherwise you're spot on doogie!

 
What the fuck? Have you not watched Sark ball the last 4 years? I'll help you out:

2009

Loss at home to LSU, loss to an average Notre Dame team on the road.

2010

Faceplant to open the season at BYU, curb stomping at home against a good, but ultimately non BCS Nebraska.

2011

We fucking got lucky to hang on against Eastern Washington, played shitty at home against Hawaii, and got boat raced in Lincoln.

2012

Squeaked by SDSU because their coach was a fucktard, got annihilated in Baton Rouge.

There is no reason to think Boise isn't capable of beating us, handily, to open the season. And just like 2009 Notre Dame and 2010 BYU, they could lay an egg at Illinois. Shit, Arizona's probably due to beat us at Husky Stadium again. Then we have Oregon and Stanford coming up? I'm predicting 2-2 after the first 4 and probably 2-5 after that. FUCK.
Click to expand...
USCWell you are being fucktarded College. A first year head coach just doesn't put the pieces of a Ty Willy team and go on the road and beat. ANY ND team.
Click to expand...

Bad Point

[/QUOTE]I've contended all along the 2009 was Snark's best coaching job and best team. Got repeatedly banned for it by those mushy cunts at fagman. His teams have went downhill since. But to rail on him for 2009 is ignant (they were a 7-6 (except for ND refs and Polk call, saw same thing with Stanford and Stephan Taylor last year, exact!)

[/QUOTE]

Decent point.

[/QUOTE]and we played pretty fucking well vs Hawaii. 21-zip in 1st quarter and a solid win, showing Sark can make adjustments (although Holtard couldn't). Otherwise you're spot on doogie!

[/QUOTE]

Bad point.
 
Why does collegedoog hate trends? Sark the last three years has had a 3+ game win streak(in two of those years a 4 game win streak) which leads into a 3+game losing streak or is coming off of a 3+ game losing streak.

Why I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three. I don't see UW starting off 2-2 or even 1-3 which is asinine. Sark isn't Ty, he's average. To be average you don't bottom out like that.
 
Why does collegedoog hate trends? Sark the last three years has had a 3+ game win streak(in two of those years a 4 game win streak) which leads into a 3+game losing streak or is coming off of a 3+ game losing streak.

Why I think UW starts off 4-0 then loses next three. I don't see UW starting off 2-2 or even 1-3 which is asinine. Sark isn't Ty, he's average. To be average you don't bottom out like that.
Click to expand...

The rewriting of history. Ty was average just like Sark.
 
UW will relatively easily achieve 4-0

BSU - W decently easy in the new husky stadium and home opener, also this isnt the BSU that beat Oklahoma or Oregon

@ Illinois - W really easy win, doesnt matter that its away, Illinois is worse than WSU, they won TWO FUCKING GAMES last year (Charleston Southern University and Western Michigan). They weren't competitive in any of their 10 losses.

Idaho st. - W another easy win, Idaho st. won ONE FUCKING GAME (Black Hills st. College? Who?) Giving up 70+ points to power houses like Portland st, Montana, Nebraska, and Cal Poly. They were competitive in one of their loses (UC Davis 52-45). In their 10 losses Idaho St. did hold a single opponent under 40 points.

Arizona - W Home games havent ever really been the problem with Sark and Arizona really isn't all that great, They are decent but with Illinois and Idaho st leading up to the game there is no reason why everyone shouldnt be rested and well prepped for the first real game. This will be the point in time where the doogs jump over here and ask WHERE IS RACE BANNON NOW?... the response should be let it play out as UW will likely go on the traditional 3 game losing streak next.
Click to expand...

UW will start either 2-2 or 1-3, cook it. I have all the screenshots I need.
Click to expand...

*Bump*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top