You have no idea of the number and your party doesn't want to find out
You have no idea of the number and your party doesn't want to find out
![]()
“The analysis shows that strict identification laws have a differentially negative impact on the turnout of Hispanics, Blacks, Asian-Americans, and multi-racial Americans in primaries and general elections,”
So, now you admit the size and scope is much larger than what you were touting at the beginning of his thread?
You have no idea of the number and your party doesn't want to find out
![]()
I know the number. It's not substantial
https://www.brennancenter.org/analysis/resources-voter-fraud-claims
Even your buddies at the National Review's best effort was 2,000 out of 4,000,000. And that assumes they all voted in the last election, which even their article didn't claim.
it's almost as if we have studies on shit like thisIt is equally naive to deny that at least a portion of those 2.8 Million were illegals or non-registered voters.
I have no idea whether there were more than 2.8 Million illegal votes cast. It could be way more, it could be way less.
it's almost as if we have studies on shit like thisIt is equally naive to deny that at least a portion of those 2.8 Million were illegals or non-registered voters.
I have no idea whether there were more than 2.8 Million illegal votes cast. It could be way more, it could be way less.
it's almost as if we have studies on shit like thisIt is equally naive to deny that at least a portion of those 2.8 Million were illegals or non-registered voters.
I have no idea whether there were more than 2.8 Million illegal votes cast. It could be way more, it could be way less.
linked in this very thread, multiple times, even
it's almost as if we have studies on shit like thisIt is equally naive to deny that at least a portion of those 2.8 Million were illegals or non-registered voters.
I have no idea whether there were more than 2.8 Million illegal votes cast. It could be way more, it could be way less.
linked in this very thread, multiple times, even
Fake study bitch
Sad thing is, it's the Republicans always screaming about fake news yet they believe the fake news they want to hear.
Trump won the electoral college, but he lost the popular vote by over 2.8 million votes to Clinton. The president has blamed his popular vote loss on widespread voter fraud, but there is no evidence to support his claim. Still, a new Morning Consult/Politico poll found 47 percent of Republicans believe Trump won the popular vote, while just 42 percent believe Clinton won. Overall, the poll found, 28 percent of voters believe Trump won the popular vote.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/almost-half-republicans-believe-trump-163011933.html
It is equally naive to deny that at least a portion of those 2.8 Million were illegals or non-registered voters.
I have no idea whether there were more than 2.8 Million illegal votes cast. It could be way more, it could be way less.
It's a fucking red herring. Republicans have been looking for illegal voters for years, and haven't come up with shit and lied to the courts about it.
Hell, in Texas, they could only prosecute 50 cases of voter fraud over a ten-year period, with a special task force nominated by the Republican Governor looking for it. Mind you, we're talking about millions of votes in a state with a 700-mile border with Mexico.
Just saying illegals voting is a problem, without evidence, doesn't make it one.
In order to have evidence you need the desire to look for it which we all know the democrats don't [already proven false - all those people looking for voter fraud in numerous studies, task forces, etc.] . That in itself is a red flag [huh?]. In California you can register to vote without proof of citizenship and there are groups to exist to register illegals [I went to the SoS website and it said you need a CA license or ID card (requires birth certificate) and your SSN (requires US citizenship or green card)]
So, you are right in the most technical sense. Someone could present a green card and a CA license and vote. Problem is, they will be flashing red whenever the list gets checked, which it does. And then they would be subject to criminal penalties and deportation. Again, it's theoretically possible, but the folks who are looking for it haven't found a problem. So why are we looking to fix something that isn't broken?
If you don't have processes in place to ensure only legals vote you have another giant red flag, not red herring.
The process is the affidavit, sworn under penalty of perjury, that the person completing the application is a US citizen.
In Virginia we have proof and the Governor, a Clinton hack, won't cooperate with the Trump initiative to find out. Red flag, not herring
No, that's Kris Kobach, a known liar and suppressor of minority votes. Almost every state, including many Republican ones agree with Virginia and the Clinton hack
nationalreview.com/article/448098/virginia-voter-fraud-report-noncitizens-voted-illegally
Allegedly, 2,000 illegals voted at some point in the past. 6,000 illegals were registered to vote. Out of 5,000,000 registered voters and 4,000,000 voters in the last election. So the system seems to be working. It's a fringe problem, not a threat to our democracy.
When a party refuses to cooperate and just mouths shit about red herrings its a red flag.
Or, you know, someone making something out of nothing so they can keep the blicks and spacs from voting legally
When you lose the argument pull the race card
I live in California - you are wrong. In Virginia illegals signed the affidavit when they weren't legal
Why are you so interested in not investigating
Red flag
2,000 votes out of 4 million = CRISIS
Voter suppression is real
SacBee claims another 1,000,000 illegals set to vote
http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article163623103.html
No one cares
It is equally naive to deny that at least a portion of those 2.8 Million were illegals or non-registered voters.
I have no idea whether there were more than 2.8 Million illegal votes cast. It could be way more, it could be way less.
it's almost as if we have studies on shit like thisIt is equally naive to deny that at least a portion of those 2.8 Million were illegals or non-registered voters.
I have no idea whether there were more than 2.8 Million illegal votes cast. It could be way more, it could be way less.
linked in this very thread, multiple times, even
Fake study bitch
which one was fake? There were like 50 of them
It is equally naive to deny that at least a portion of those 2.8 Million were illegals or non-registered voters.
I have no idea whether there were more than 2.8 Million illegal votes cast. It could be way more, it could be way less.
My opinion? Sure, of course.
If you're smart enough to vote illegally and have it stick, you and your vote are good with me.
From too many years of being a fake lawyer, I have come to believe that paperwork and "legal" status and all that shit matter not one little bit.
Show me a scrappy Mexican who was ballzy enough to (1) get here, (2) feed himself, and (3) find a way to register his vote, and I'll show you a wet back that I want to keep here and take the place of a fat, macaroni 'n cheese eating, Grays Harbor dwelling, welfare taking, crack smoking, baby making piece of trash who doesn't vote anyway.
Chupa me la Pinga Maricon!