The Huskies are in the playoff race

All these fucking hypotheticals about keeping paying Jedd big bucks now are fucking aids.
I don't give a fuck if UCLA has an opening (plus sunshine) or if Florida has an opening (plus sunshine). You don't bet the future of the program on 6-2 with no 10 ft birdie putts made, Jedd.
There's a huge delta between his worth to the program between 8-4 and 10-2 and both are still very much on the table.
LIPO.
10 years ago I'm absolutely agreeing with you
Today … I think we have to be very realistic about what the implications of losing a coach are in this world of college football where you aren't just losing your coach but often very significant portions of one's roster.
While it's fair to counter that by saying that you'll likely get a good chunk of the roster from whatever coach you end up hiring, I'd say it is very unlikely in how deep this years coaching carousal is that UW would be at the top of the list and wouldn't take a step back if they were to lose Jedd and effectively start over closer to what 2024 looked like.
I have no illusions that Jedd will eventually leave … but hopefully we can have a couple of really good years of success before he does leave and when he leaves it is heading to the NFL instead of elsewhere in college
But there's no strong evidence yet to suggest JEDD IS THE FUCKING GUY and we MUST back up the Brinks truck NOW!!
At least when DeBoer went 11-2 in 2022 with wins over Oregon and Texas, you could say he probably was the guy.
I don't give a fuck about all the hypothetical roster attrition, it's too risky to bet the house on Jedd at 6-2.
I think there's more evidence than what you think but it's fair to say that he shouldn't be paid at the top top end of things.
But should he bump up from say $7M to closer to $9M towards that upper middle tier of the conference particularly in light of the market and extensions of other coaches (notably Rhule) … I think you can argue for that.
From what I've heard I think Jedd is more focused on increasing the budget for his staff and roster than his own number at this point.
So perhaps what is needed is getting more committed NIL money, raises for his staff, a couple of add-on years to the back-end of his deal with nominal raises to his existing deal, and a resetting of his buyout should another CFB school try to take him … perhaps write into the terms different numbers for him leaving for a CFB coaching job vs a NFL HC job.
The abundance of jobs in the market right now is going to drive compensation up if you want a coach with any kind of proven experience.
You may not want to acknowledge the changing market and implications to a roster but it is a real one and worth paying attention to. That turmoil does not seem to me to be a valid risk to undertake over what in the big picture are nominal dollars.
I understand and appreciate your points here. But the “abundance of jobs” out there shows how much money is being wasted on shitty to mediocre coaches.
 
This will be an unpopular take…
But I would almost prefer to see Washington knock off Miami or Tennessee in the Holiday Bowl (or whatever) to finish the season on a positive note and with double digit wins, than getting thrashed 41-10 by Georgia or Ole Miss in the first round of the playoffs. (And that is based on UW winning out the regular season, of course).
If I felt this team had a puncher's chance to go deep in the playoffs, I would see things differently of course.
That's beta loser talk …
No offense … but we need to get this kind of thinking out of the fanbase
Beta loser stuff was UW not making a major league attempt to sign DeBoer.
 
Not to extend the disagreement, but someone upthread mentioned that DeB didn't like the UW fanbase or administration. I had never read or heard that. Was that a real thing? IOW, did he independently want out of here or was it Alabama and money?
I noted in a post last year that DeBoer said it was nice to be at a place (Alabama) where winning was taken seriously. I took it as a swipe at UW. Other than that, I've never heard of any other indication.
 
@YellowSnow
You'll never get me to say that the money getting thrown around in college football is a good use of money or makes any kind of business sense
For many of these programs this type of money is a tax write-off and/or a source of dick measuring amongst elitists
I think what you're bringing up (how deep of waters do you want to get in playing the current game) is valid …
But what I'd respond with is that the rules of the game are what they are at this point …
Not playing the game has some obvious problematic issues to it
Playing the game means throwing around some Monopoly money
Getting some form of control over this insanity is needed in general …
But until this day comes you're either in or you're out …
It's probably a rare instance where Race and I would agree in terms of "show me" through your actions with money
 
@DerekJohnson
Only those tied into the negotiations know how serious UW was in their attempts to keep KDB and how open KDB was to staying
A lot probably also depends on how much of a heads-up KDB had that Alabama was on the table and at what point that was the case
I've stated on numerous instances that I had it communicated to me that "all will be fine if we can sign Coach to a contract" from someone inside the program entering November of 2023. At the time I took that to mean that we needed to come up with a number that made sense. In hindsight I took that to be more reflective of whether he was even open to staying.
For as much as people here want to skewer Fisch for his job hopping (and it's a fair criticism) … that same criticism is also a fair one to have on KDB.
I don't think anybody knows what exactly the number would have been to keep KDB here … if that was even possible (which those that want to skewer the AD for KDB leaving fail to acknowledge as a possibility).
What I do think makes a lot of sense is to say that anything at comparable money to Alabama was almost certainly have KDB leaving for Alabama.
I also think when having this conversation that it has to be called out that UW is getting a 1/2 share of B10 revenues in the short- to mid-term (anticipated full-share date is the 2030-2031 athletic year) and big picture doesn't have as rich or funded of an athletic department that Alabama has. IF this was going to turn into a bidding war it was a battle that UW was ill equipped to win.
I don't really know what the disdain for not keeping DeBoer and by default hating Fisch for not being DeBoer is getting you and others.
The irony is that there's a very real chance that Fisch will be living in a similar manner to that of DeBoer and there will be a celebration for not caving to keep Fisch all the while we hire a coach that has far more questions than Fisch and the balance of the roster gets gutted (again) and the new coach likely doesn't have the ability to restock the roster in the short-term with anything close to what went out the door.
 
Not to extend the disagreement, but someone upthread mentioned that DeB didn't like the UW fanbase or administration. I had never read or heard that. Was that a real thing? IOW, did he independently want out of here or was it Alabama and money?
I noted in a post last year that DeBoer said it was nice to be at a place (Alabama) where winning was taken seriously. I took it as a swipe at UW. Other than that, I've never heard of any other indication.
UW is a proud and successful college football program on the whole when you look at history
Alabama is the bluest of the blue bloods, is a national brand, and is THE team for an entire state.
If your upset because UW isn't Alabama … I'm not sure what to tell you
You could have unlimited access to money in the short-term and I'm not sure that that's even enough to shift that barrier or perspective
 
stability matters or it doesn’t. Who can even tell at this point. Win now.
who has money and who wants to win. Fire fisch or fisch leaves. Until he wins the conference who gives a fuck
 
@DerekJohnson
Only those tied into the negotiations know how serious UW was in their attempts to keep KDB and how open KDB was to staying
A lot probably also depends on how much of a heads-up KDB had that Alabama was on the table and at what point that was the case
I've stated on numerous instances that I had it communicated to me that "all will be fine if we can sign Coach to a contract" from someone inside the program entering November of 2023. At the time I took that to mean that we needed to come up with a number that made sense. In hindsight I took that to be more reflective of whether he was even open to staying.
For as much as people here want to skewer Fisch for his job hopping (and it's a fair criticism) … that same criticism is also a fair one to have on KDB.
I don't think anybody knows what exactly the number would have been to keep KDB here … if that was even possible (which those that want to skewer the AD for KDB leaving fail to acknowledge as a possibility).
What I do think makes a lot of sense is to say that anything at comparable money to Alabama was almost certainly have KDB leaving for Alabama.
I also think when having this conversation that it has to be called out that UW is getting a 1/2 share of B10 revenues in the short- to mid-term (anticipated full-share date is the 2030-2031 athletic year) and big picture doesn't have as rich or funded of an athletic department that Alabama has. IF this was going to turn into a bidding war it was a battle that UW was ill equipped to win.
I don't really know what the disdain for not keeping DeBoer and by default hating Fisch for not being DeBoer is getting you and others.
The irony is that there's a very real chance that Fisch will be living in a similar manner to that of DeBoer and there will be a celebration for not caving to keep Fisch all the while we hire a coach that has far more questions than Fisch and the balance of the roster gets gutted (again) and the new coach likely doesn't have the ability to restock the roster in the short-term with anything close to what went out the door.

I don't really know what the disdain for not keeping DeBoer and by default hating Fisch for not being DeBoer is getting you and others.
Of course you understand. As I have stated several times, the disdain was not in making a balls-to-the-wall effort to keep DeBoer. I have repeatedly said that ultimately we don't know if there was a possibility or not. The failure is in the not going major league in the effort to retain him. Secondly, I have never said that I hate Fisch. I have said that I consider him a bit of a used car salesman. I have found his in-game decisions wanting. If he beats Oregon and gets into the playoffs and then signs a nice extension at UW, then I'd be glad about it and would acknowledge my judgment of him was wrong. But all of that ain't happening.
 
I have a hard time with the monopoly money theory. Every program is begging the fans for NIL, trying to fill seats, and bending over backwards for TV revenue. I can't compute that with the money not mattering and with that in mind I have to wonder if these insane buyouts and poor monetary choices will bite schools when it comes to buying players or hiring the next HC
 
So we’re going on Dannen’s word now. Cool. I’m more inclined to believe UW’s offer wasn’t anything close to $1 million less (IOW it was likely a lot gappier than that) and DeBoer just said “fuck you guys if you’re not gonna be serious.”

that’s way more believable than anything out of Dannen’s fat Midwest mouth
Somehow I didn't see this post the first time through. This nails it in a nutshell.
 
@YellowSnow
You'll never get me to say that the money getting thrown around in college football is a good use of money or makes any kind of business sense
For many of these programs this type of money is a tax write-off and/or a source of dick measuring amongst elitists
I think what you're bringing up (how deep of waters do you want to get in playing the current game) is valid …
But what I'd respond with is that the rules of the game are what they are at this point …
Not playing the game has some obvious problematic issues to it
Playing the game means throwing around some Monopoly money
Getting some form of control over this insanity is needed in general …
But until this day comes you're either in or you're out …
It's probably a rare instance where Race and I would agree in terms of "show me" through your actions with money
Again, I agree with the idea that if you lose Jedd, next year will probably suck regardless of who we can hire. But I also don't like making rash decisions from a place of fear over abundance of openings hypotheticals. If we get to 9-2, I'm willing to entertain upping Jedd's package.
We have nothing to fear, but fear itself.
 
I'm just hoping we actually get to 9-2, so we can play out some of these scenarios.

etbxmbewyaez2hw.jpg
 
Last edited:
Didn't Fickel go 6-6 at THE Ohio State when Trestle got fired over the free player tats? I think that's closest to the real Fickel.
Cincinnati got fat from beating up Tulsa, Tulane, and Navy.

But you can't expect to win in Madison when it's under 50 degrees. You just can't.
 
Here's the positioning I feel like Judd has based on the most realistic outcomes this month.
8-4 (lose to Oregon, probably UCLA, maybe Wiscy) - Doesn't deserve a raise/extension from UW. Might try to position the UCLA job to get one. Not sure what to do there. UCLA would still take him, probably.
9-3 (lose to Oregon) - Doesn't deserve a raise/extension, but agent can probably weasel UW into one. UCLA would take him.
10-2 - UW has to buck up. Would think Florida and any of the jobs open right now not called LSU could offer him.
I'd take a road playoff game, especially with the possibility you can get some paper tiger like a Big 12 team. I personally watched WSU basically play Ole Miss even in Oxford. Outside of Ohio State, Indiana, and possibly Bama, I'm not really scared of any of the teams around there, especially if UW can show they can beat Oregon.
I think almost all Little 12 teams are very beatable, except BYU, in Provo.

With top ten talent and depth, sure.

This team got manhandled by a not elite Michigan team.
 
Back
Top