What's changed with you Bucky Boi?lol Sledog had zero problem believing that same person last year. What changed?BidenBros cheer!
What's changed with you Bucky Boi?lol Sledog had zero problem believing that same person last year. What changed?BidenBros cheer!
His ring sting is acting up. He's cranky.What's changed with you Bucky Boi?lol Sledog had zero problem believing that same person last year. What changed?BidenBros cheer!
Seems to me that the old gal had difficulty getting the numbers right, regardless of who is in power, and that's why she got fired. She sucked at her job last year, and still did this year, apparently.No reply!!!! This whole board had no problem believing the revisions last year when it was Biden, now all of a sudden those numbers can’t be trusted when Trump says so.
You quoated Biden numbers while blaming Trump you dipshit!The BLS report is always a survey at first and as more data filters in, it becomes more accurate. Again this is the gold standard.
Let me remind you, Trump cited nothing specific on why he thought the numbers were wrong. They were wrong because it painted him in a negative light that’s the real reason.
And the thing is, if he had played this smarter, he could have played this against Powell, but he didn’t have the foresight to do so.
Never mind my shitty numbers.
Youre RIGHT @GeorgiaDuck. This is quite stunning!!Who could have called this? I mean- outside of anyone who's paying attention.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/21/economy/bls-jobs-revisions/index.html
The bookkeepers plugged in the deposits and disbursements but the CFO had to make accruals?!?It’s far more intensive than just presenting the data. Something 60-70% of jobs are on w2, that part is easy and one of your interns could handle that. Many assumptions need to be made to fill in the last part, and she clearly made bad assumptions which are her job to get right, and she failed miserably. End of story.