Someone needs to stop Pete

When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.

Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.

Hmmmmm. Clearly not top 3 in the nation, and he certainly hasn't proven he's top 3 in the conference, but who are you taking over him? Shaw for sure, after that Pete's got 2 BCS bowel wins, which get an asterisk since they didn't come in the Pac, but even with an asterisk I think they outshine anybody else in the Pac's resume. Maybe you could argue for Dick Rod, or Slicer could argue for Leach, but I'm taking Pete over either of them. Who else would you even put up there, Slingblade?

He needs to get better. Just being top 3 in the Pac12FuckingDreckfest isnt good enough, don't twist, but I do think Pete's in the top 3.
 
When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.

Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.

Hmmmmm. Clearly not top 3 in the nation, and he certainly hasn't proven he's top 3 in the conference, but who are you taking over him? Shaw for sure, after that Pete's got 2 BCS bowel wins, which get an asterisk since they didn't come in the Pac, but even with an asterisk I think they outshine anybody else in the Pac's resume. Maybe you could argue for Dick Rod, or Slicer could argue for Leach, but I'm taking Pete over either of them. Who else would you even put up there, Slingblade?

He needs to get better. Just being top 3 in the Pac12FuckingDreckfest isnt good enough, don't twist, but I do think Pete's in the top 3.

Given the history of coaches after they leave Boise State, his time there can't be counted when discussing Pac-12 coaches.

Shut the fuck up and win.
 
When you're a top 3 coach in america, you can get away with anything, including 3 wins in year 3. Trumpy knows all about that type of latitude.

Just stop. Petersen hasn't proven he's even a top 3 coach in the conference. I'm pretty sure he's not.

Hmmmmm. Clearly not top 3 in the nation, and he certainly hasn't proven he's top 3 in the conference, but who are you taking over him? Shaw for sure, after that Pete's got 2 BCS bowel wins, which get an asterisk since they didn't come in the Pac, but even with an asterisk I think they outshine anybody else in the Pac's resume. Maybe you could argue for Dick Rod, or Slicer could argue for Leach, but I'm taking Pete over either of them. Who else would you even put up there, Slingblade?

He needs to get better. Just being top 3 in the Pac12FuckingDreckfest isnt good enough, don't twist, but I do think Pete's in the top 3.

Given the history of coaches after they leave Boise State, his time there can't be counted when discussing Pac-12 coaches.

Shut the fuck up and win.

Nobody else won a BCS bowel there so I think it's still a poont in his favor. The history of Boise corches is why it gets a big asterisk though, no question.

But feel free to make the argument about which three PacDreck corches you'd take over Peterman.
 
Let me explain base. Ty and sark got 5 (sark would have got 6 or more) Pete is a better coach, and by a fucking mile. See the logic there ya dipshit base?

Dipshit says three wrongs don't make a right. If UW goes 6-7, Pete is no better - I might argue he's worse- than Sark and probably closer to Ty.

Difference is Pete aint going 6-7. Mark my words haterfaggots 9 wins at a minimum this year.
 
Listen buttuckbaabs. Bruce Snyder, one of best Pac coaches of all time started15 freshman his 2nd year, including true freshman Jake plummer. The similarities between ASU and UW are astonishingly similar. 6-8 all pac10 LT juan rouque , member him? Of course not, but mirror image to trey adams.

His 5th year, he came within a play of the national title. It takes 4-5years to build a program, Bruce Snyder did it twice. Get that through your fucking skull. Cant build a program from scratch in 3 years. It DOESNT happen.

You show daily, what an ill informed loon you are baabs. Its embarrassing to read.

Puppy taking the board to school! You all on the short bus tho.
 
Puppy wants Pete to fail just so he can be right?

What the hell are you talking about? Im the ONLY one here next to Steel2 who knows Petersen will be extremely successful here. Thats the way pup will be right Derek.

Hey don't fucking leave me off this train Puppy. I'm all in.
 
Let me explain base. Ty and sark got 5 (sark would have got 6 or more) Pete is a better coach, and by a fucking mile. See the logic there ya dipshit base?

Dipshit says three wrongs don't make a right. If UW goes 6-7, Pete is no better - I might argue he's worse- than Sark and probably closer to Ty.

Difference is Pete aint going 6-7. Mark my words haterfaggots 9 wins at a minimum this year.

IF: in case that; granting or supposing that; on condition that
 
Last edited:
Let me explain base. Ty and sark got 5 (sark would have got 6 or more) Pete is a better coach, and by a fucking mile. See the logic there ya dipshit base?

Dipshit says three wrongs don't make a right. If UW goes 6-7, Pete is no better - I might argue he's worse- than Sark and probably closer to Ty.

Difference is Pete aint going 6-7. Mark my words haterfaggots 9 wins at a minimum this year.

IF: in case that; granting or supposing that; on condition that

I will do all you fellas a solid and leave this board FOREVA if Petersen doesnt win at least 9 games. If you are in on this quote this post and when he wins you all have to give me a Chincredible or whatever the flavor of the month is at that time.
 


Let me explain base. Ty and sark got 5 (sark would have got 6 or more) Pete is a better coach, and by a fucking mile. See the logic there ya dipshit base?

Dipshit says three wrongs don't make a right. If UW goes 6-7, Pete is no better - I might argue he's worse- than Sark and probably closer to Ty.

Difference is Pete aint going 6-7. Mark my words haterfaggots 9 wins at a minimum this year.

IF: in case that; granting or supposing that; on condition that

I will do all you fellas a solid and leave this board FOREVA if Petersen doesnt win at least 9 games. If you are in on this quote this post and when he wins you all have to give me a Chincredible or whatever the flavor of the month is at that time.

Shit post
Shit poster
 
Last edited:
Let me explain base. Ty and sark got 5 (sark would have got 6 or more) Pete is a better coach, and by a fucking mile. See the logic there ya dipshit base?

Dipshit says three wrongs don't make a right. If UW goes 6-7, Pete is no better - I might argue he's worse- than Sark and probably closer to Ty.

Difference is Pete aint going 6-7. Mark my words haterfaggots 9 wins at a minimum this year.

IF: in case that; granting or supposing that; on condition that

I will do all you fellas a solid and leave this board FOREVA if Petersen doesnt win at least 9 games. If you are in on this quote this post and when he wins you all have to give me a Chincredible or whatever the flavor of the month is at that time.

I just want Peterman to loose so I can be right Spooge will LEAVE!
 
Splooge is gone. I told you Fuckers I ain't him. Everybody just form a line at 7-11 on Aurora and I'll take on all cumers.
 
Last edited:
Splooge is gone. I told you Fuckers I ain't him.1 Everybody just form a line at 7-11 on Aurora and I'll take on all cumers.2

But then you supersede your Spoogiest statement with an even Spoogier one in the same poast.
 
Splooge is gone. I told you Fuckers I ain't him.1 Everybody just form a line at 7-11 on Aurora and I'll take on all cumers.2

But then you supersede your Spoogiest statement with an even Spoogier one in the same poast.

Just trying to make you Fuckers Think and care.
 
ChedrNRW4AA06Go.jpg
 
Putting my money where my mouth is. Had buddy in Vegas, wanted to place bet on Dawgs winning Pac 12 but those odds won't be out for awhile.
 
Back
Top