So Fetters is a qb expert now...comedy

Pup, Haener is very short, sinks lower as he steps into his throw putting him way down there, has a low release, and has a slow release. He stares down his receivers. He throws way too many picks.

Short version...he sucks.

Eason obviously isn't perfect, however he protected the ball pretty well at Georgia and has none of the other issues I just mentioned.
Click to expand...

At least u brought thought-out positions Chuck thank you. It's how a forum should function.
However Haener is not 'very short'. He has a thick trunk and bigger and stronger than browning.

No he doesnt 'dip down' as you said. He adjusts his body to complete his throws based on what's in front of him. No Chuck he doesnt have a 'slow release'. That's ignorant and factually untrue. The arm strength comment is laughable. You dont know what you're talking about. That's funny shit

And Chuck, he doesnt stare down his receivers anymore than Jake did as a senior.

And the most fucking retarted thing you could say is that he throws too many picks. Obviously you read and ran with Fetters comments. Browning threw more picks in practice as A FUCKING SENIOR than Haener has as a sophomore. Again, stop reading Fetters talking points.

Browning tightened up picks in games...which is why he never took chances. He just held the ball, took sacks or ran out of bounds with wide open WRs.
 
Last edited:
Pup likes to claim that he’s the smartest ...

Then he Champions Haener ...

I rest my case ...

How’s Franny?
 
Pup likes to claim that he’s the smartest ...

Then he Champions Haener ...

I rest my case ...

How’s Franny?
Click to expand...

Care to share your points on the qb's tequilla? Like at dawgman, you never really said much, just went after others who had valid things to say. You? Like Race, been waiting 20-something years
 
Pup, Haener is very short, sinks lower as he steps into his throw putting him way down there, has a low release, and has a slow release. He stares down his receivers. He throws way too many picks.

Short version...he sucks.

Eason obviously isn't perfect, however he protected the ball pretty well at Georgia and has none of the other issues I just mentioned.
Click to expand...

At least u brought thought-out positions Chuck thank you. It's how a forum should function.
However Haener is not 'very short'. He has a thick trunk and bigger and stronger than browning.

No he doesnt 'dip down' as you said. He adjusts his body to complete his throws based on what's in front of him. No Chuck he doesnt have a 'slow release'. That's ignorant and factually untrue. The arm strength comment is laughable. You dont know what you're talking about. That's funny shit

And Chuck, he doesnt stare down his receivers anymore than Jake did as a senior.

And the most fucking retarted thing you could say is that he throws too many picks. Obviously you read and ran with Fetters comments. Browning threw more picks in practice as A FUCKING SENIOR than Haener has as a sophomore. Again, stop reading Fetters talking points.

Browning tightened up picks in games...which is why he never took chances. He just held the ball, took sacks or ran out of bounds with wide open WRs.
Click to expand...

Man you suck at this. I didn't comment on arm strength...not even close to doing so. I also didn't compare him to Browning,who happens to be 2" taller and at least 10 lbs heavier than Haener. Keep railing against the arguments you imagine rather than those presented though. It's how you convince yourself you've won.

I can't and don't read fetter's shit anymore pup. Haven't since I came here. Haener throws too many picks in practice pup. If he's doing it that much there, he's going to do it in games.
 
Chuck you said he's short, throws too many picks and has a slow release. I compared him to browning because fetters said he throws a lot of picks. No he doesnt, browning threw more. Fetters just drew attention to it ignorantly. I brought Brownhole into as a comparison to a 4 year starter with conference honors. As you just said Haener "sucks" without even being accurate about him or his game. Got it? He hardly has a slow release. Paus and Miley cyrus had slow releases. Big fucking difference chucky
 
Last edited:
Pup, Haener is very short, sinks lower as he steps into his throw putting him way down there, has a low release, and has a slow release. He stares down his receivers. He throws way too many picks.

Short version...he sucks.

Eason obviously isn't perfect, however he protected the ball pretty well at Georgia and has none of the other issues I just mentioned.
Click to expand...

At least u brought thought-out positions Chuck thank you. It's how a forum should function.
However Haener is not 'very short'. He has a thick trunk and bigger and stronger than browning.

Ummm what does thickness have to do with height?[/b]

No he doesnt 'dip down' as you said. He adjusts his body to complete his throws based on what's in front of him.

Unfortunately for WASHINGTON this happens to be the opposing team's Linebacker more often than not.[/b]

Chuck he doesnt have a 'slow release'. That's ignorant and factually untrue. The arm strength comment is laughable. You dont know what you're talking about. That's funny shit.

When the bullets were live Haener was throwing bounce passes like it was basketball.[/b]

And Chuck, he doesnt stare down his receivers anymore than Jake did as a senior.

Sark > Ty POTD[/b]

And the most fucking retarted thing you could say is that he throws too many picks. Obviously you read and ran with Fetters comments. Browning threw more picks in practice as A FUCKING SENIOR than Haener has as a sophomore. Again, stop reading Fetters talking points.

The only person reading Dawgman reports is you.[/b]

Browning tightened up picks in games...which is why he never took chances. He just held the ball, took sacks or ran out of bounds with wide open WRs.

Haener's pick wasn't a case of letting it rip and losing a 50/50 ball, he simply didn't see the field and made a terrible decision. Also Sark>Ty[/b]
Click to expand...

 
Pup likes to claim that he’s the smartest ...

Then he Champions Haener ...

I rest my case ...

How’s Franny?
Click to expand...

Care to share your points on the qb's tequilla? Like at dawgman, you never really said much, just went after others who had valid things to say. You? Like Race, been waiting 20-something years
Click to expand...

Good point ... I’ve never said anything of consequence over the years or on a pod
 
But since you asked ...

Haener is a try hard midget that thinks he has a better arm than he does ... he routinely tries to fit throws into dangerous spots and it leads to turnovers. Every practice I’ve seen he’s done the same thing over and over. At Cal last year he did the same thing.

In the end, he’s a turnover machine. That dog don’t hunt.
 
I remember when Nick Saban put a freshman QB into an ominous situation once... the freshman QB came in down 13 at halftime in a game that wasn't quite the epic "on the road at Cal" scenario, but national championship nonetheless, and the freshman QB didn't skip a pass or throw a pick 6.

but still... Haener.
 
Pup, Haener is very short, sinks lower as he steps into his throw putting him way down there, has a low release, and has a slow release. He stares down his receivers. He throws way too many picks.

Short version...he sucks.

Eason obviously isn't perfect, however he protected the ball pretty well at Georgia and has none of the other issues I just mentioned.
Click to expand...

At least u brought thought-out positions Chuck thank you. It's how a forum should function.
However Haener is not 'very short'. He has a thick trunk and bigger and stronger than browning.

Ummm what does thickness have to do with height?[/b]

No he doesnt 'dip down' as you said. He adjusts his body to complete his throws based on what's in front of him.

Unfortunately for WASHINGTON this happens to be the opposing team's Linebacker more often than not.[/b]

Chuck he doesnt have a 'slow release'. That's ignorant and factually untrue. The arm strength comment is laughable. You dont know what you're talking about. That's funny shit.

When the bullets were live Haener was throwing bounce passes like it was basketball.[/b]

And Chuck, he doesnt stare down his receivers anymore than Jake did as a senior.

Sark > Ty POTD[/b]

And the most fucking retarted thing you could say is that he throws too many picks. Obviously you read and ran with Fetters comments. Browning threw more picks in practice as A FUCKING SENIOR than Haener has as a sophomore. Again, stop reading Fetters talking points.

The only person reading Dawgman reports is you.[/b]

Browning tightened up picks in games...which is why he never took chances. He just held the ball, took sacks or ran out of bounds with wide open WRs.

Haener's pick wasn't a case of letting it rip and losing a 50/50 ball, he simply didn't see the field and made a terrible decision. Also Sark>Ty[/b]
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Doogles I've been doing this a long time. Answering bullet points from a skinny Jean's wearing dorm donkey is beneath me but I will entertain for comedy. Ok let's go. Where do I start? But promise me you'll at least pay to get laid instead of VR. No shame in that.
 
But since you asked ...

Haener is a try hard midget that thinks he has a better arm than he does ... he routinely tries to fit throws into dangerous spots and it leads to turnovers. Every practice I’ve seen he’s done the same thing over and over. At Cal last year he did the same thing.

In the end, he’s a turnover machine. That dog don’t hunt.
Click to expand...

Tequilla thank you. ..its what Jake didnt do. It's what we needed at Auburn, Cal, Rose bowl. Jake was awesome @ Oregon so I cant criticize, his best game as a dawg. Jake was so fearful of pulling trigger it stalled drives. When u have an elite defense , you can afford an I-N-T. NOT 3 CONSECUTIVE SACKS LIKE AT UTAH. Jake held ball, got sacked 3 straight plays, almost cost UW a win. Go back, look at browning's protectionism over 4 years. Sorry bout the econ reference but its valid
 
Last edited:
But since you asked ...

Haener is a try hard midget that thinks he has a better arm than he does ... he routinely tries to fit throws into dangerous spots and it leads to turnovers. Every practice I’ve seen he’s done the same thing over and over. At Cal last year he did the same thing.

In the end, he’s a turnover machine. That dog don’t hunt.
Click to expand...

Tequilla thank you. ..its what Jake didnt do. It's what we needed at Auburn, Cal, Rose bowl. Jake was awesome @ Oregon so I cant criticize, his best game as a dawg. Jake was so fearful of pulling trigger it stalled drives. When u have an elite defense , you can afford an I-N-T. NOT 3 CONSECUTIVE SACKS LIKE AT UTAH. Jake held ball, got sacked 3 straight plays, almost cost UW a win. Go back, look at browning's protectionism over 4 years. Sorry bout the econ reference but its valid
Click to expand...

I don't think that term (protectionism) in econ means what you think it means. In econ it doesn't mean to protect the ball, but rather it means to establish some other form of revenue for your own producers or some kind of tariff/law that negatively impacts others' producers. If Browning had been practicing economic protectionism then he would have had some kind of alternate action that either moved the ball forward (perhaps to run forward) or to move the other team back close to their own goal line (perhaps his infamous pooch punt) instead of just sinking into our backfield.
 
Being you buttfucks are so anti-haener it will take work. You guys, including tequilla, dont know what you're looking at so I'll do my best. Pardon if I get off track. I have 3 gadgets I'm dealing with so I'm trying to multi-task
 
Back to donkey, hit me one question at a time, I have Teqilla on line 2, baze at Fairfax, Stalin turning around, franny waiting for mustache ride, scotch waiting to be poured, Crawford-Kahn and undercard about ready to kick off (remember Pup boxed at Hillman city...dont buy UFC, boxing the best sport of the 2), Steel2 I've barely talked to today, 2 vizsla's I have to feed and walk...a sub from Jeno's I have to eat...I'm forgetting something. Ok donkey, I'll get to your dumbass later. Like baze earlier, that was a quick dispatch.
 
Last edited:
But since you asked ...

Haener is a try hard midget that thinks he has a better arm than he does ... he routinely tries to fit throws into dangerous spots and it leads to turnovers. Every practice I’ve seen he’s done the same thing over and over. At Cal last year he did the same thing.

In the end, he’s a turnover machine. That dog don’t hunt.
Click to expand...

Tequilla thank you. ..its what Jake didnt do. It's what we needed at Auburn, Cal, Rose bowl. Jake was awesome @ Oregon so I cant criticize, his best game as a dawg. Jake was so fearful of pulling trigger it stalled drives. When u have an elite defense , you can afford an I-N-T. NOT 3 CONSECUTIVE SACKS LIKE AT UTAH. Jake held ball, got sacked 3 straight plays, almost cost UW a win. Go back, look at browning's protectionism over 4 years. Sorry bout the econ reference but its valid
Click to expand...

Haener wasn’t better than Browning ... the Cal game proved that.

The issue with Haener isn’t whether he is or would be better than Browning. The issue is whether he’d be better than Eason ... he isn’t

 
But since you asked ...

Haener is a try hard midget that thinks he has a better arm than he does ... he routinely tries to fit throws into dangerous spots and it leads to turnovers. Every practice I’ve seen he’s done the same thing over and over. At Cal last year he did the same thing.

In the end, he’s a turnover machine. That dog don’t hunt.
Click to expand...

Tequilla thank you. ..its what Jake didnt do. It's what we needed at Auburn, Cal, Rose bowl. Jake was awesome @ Oregon so I cant criticize, his best game as a dawg. Jake was so fearful of pulling trigger it stalled drives. When u have an elite defense , you can afford an I-N-T. NOT 3 CONSECUTIVE SACKS LIKE AT UTAH. Jake held ball, got sacked 3 straight plays, almost cost UW a win. Go back, look at browning's protectionism over 4 years. Sorry bout the econ reference but its valid
Click to expand...

Haener wasn’t better than Browning ... the Cal game proved that.

The issue with Haener isn’t whether he is or would be better than Browning. The issue is whether he’d be better than Eason ... he isn’t
Click to expand...

Just an ignorant but typical post tequilla. 4years vs 3 snaps. Do you think b4 you post?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top