Tequilla
Active poster
But since you asked ...
Haener is a try hard midget that thinks he has a better arm than he does ... he routinely tries to fit throws into dangerous spots and it leads to turnovers. Every practice I’ve seen he’s done the same thing over and over. At Cal last year he did the same thing.
In the end, he’s a turnover machine. That dog don’t hunt.
Tequilla thank you. ..its what Jake didnt do. It's what we needed at Auburn, Cal, Rose bowl. Jake was awesome @ Oregon so I cant criticize, his best game as a dawg. Jake was so fearful of pulling trigger it stalled drives. When u have an elite defense , you can afford an I-N-T. NOT 3 CONSECUTIVE SACKS LIKE AT UTAH. Jake held ball, got sacked 3 straight plays, almost cost UW a win. Go back, look at browning's protectionism over 4 years. Sorry bout the econ reference but its valid
Haener wasn’t better than Browning ... the Cal game proved that.
The issue with Haener isn’t whether he is or would be better than Browning. The issue is whether he’d be better than Eason ... he isn’t
Just an ignorant but typical post tequilla. 4years vs 3 snaps. Do you think b4 you post?
Sorry ... but this team doesn’t win the conference last year with Haener as QB
