GrundleStiltzkin
New Fish
Shirley had 18 career sacks in 3 years at UW. Crichton had 3 sacks in 4. Shirley is actually a legitimate Pac 12 player on 3rd down.
Third down is special, that's when the Beaver chainsaw comes out.
Shirley had 18 career sacks in 3 years at UW. Crichton had 3 sacks in 4. Shirley is actually a legitimate Pac 12 player on 3rd down.
jesus christ, you motherfuckers are dooging it up. Yeah, he was no good! It was all hype! "Cases involving stealing"? You sound like a bunch of jilted lovers.
Next stop: Ellensburg
jesus christ, you motherfuckers are dooging it up. Yeah, he was no good! It was all hype! "Cases involving stealing"? You sound like a bunch of jilted lovers.
Next stop: Ellensburg
With or without Shirley, CWU still doesn't beat Bellevue.
jesus christ, you motherfuckers are dooging it up. Yeah, he was no good! It was all hype! "Cases involving stealing"? You sound like a bunch of jilted lovers.
Next stop: Ellensburg
With or without Shirley, CWU still doesn't beat Bellevue.
weak
I never get too bummed when a player transfers. We have 85 scholarships for a reason, and we only get players for 4 years anyways. Who gives a fuck if we lose a pass rushing specialist who only had one year left to play? Frees up a scholarship.
Shirley had 18 career sacks in 3 years at UW. Crichton had 3 sacks in 4. Shirleyiswas actually a legitimate Pac 12 player.
It appears that Shirley can use the Oregon basketball rule to transfer anywhere he wants because he's graduated. The rumor is....
Back to UCLA
jesus christ, you motherfuckers are dooging it up. Yeah, he was no good! It was all hype! "Cases involving stealing"? You sound like a bunch of jilted lovers.
Next stop: Ellensburg
It appears that Shirley can use the Oregon basketball rule to transfer anywhere he wants because he's graduated. The rumor is....
Back to UCLA
So UCLA wants a guy with his kind of production? Why? That's what I thought.
It sounds like Peetamus is imploding. I am also hearing he is rubbing people the wrong way within the AD. It's just what I am hearing so no need to go and twist things, I didn't have to give you guys this information.
It appears that Shirley can use the Oregon basketball rule to transfer anywhere he wants because he's graduated. The rumor is....
Back to UCLA
So UCLA wants a guy with his kind of production? Why? That's what I thought.
If you have an open scholarship, you are getting a guy with 18 career sacks. He's a senior and if he doesn't work out, you bury him on the depth chart. There's very little downside. Maybe he provides depth so a freshman can redshirt. He had 3 last year because he hardly played and fell out of favor with the coaching staff. He's far from a great or complete player, but he's not terrible either.
My bad. Thought we were still at 86. Anyways....who the fuck cares?I never get too bummed when a player transfers. We have 85 scholarships for a reason, and we only get players for 4 years anyways. Who gives a fuck if we lose a pass rushing specialist who only had one year left to play? Frees up a scholarship.
I believe we are already under the 85 limit. Shirley is a senior, meaning his scholarship would be freed up after the season. All Shirley leaving will do is give a walk-on a scholarship for the season.
Shirley leaving hardly matters, but it is the offseason, so at least it's something football related to talk about. Now losing Taylor Hindy is great because he was terrible and it will free up a scholarship.
8 solo tackles last year. 5 assisted. Those are Talia Crichton type numbers. Enough said on that. I doubt USC or UCLA would have him, even if he could transfer to a D1 school.
WDWSA, but Talia Crichton would piss all over himself for 8 tackles in a season.
Talia Crichton had 8 solo tackles in 2010. 9 in 2012.
HTH