Shirley has left UW

Actually, it seems very reasonable to say that Wilcox improved elements of the defense while at the same time failed to connect with certain players. Who on the coaching staff decided to give Shirley a shot after the laptop thing? Assuming Sark and Nansen. Like I said earlier in the thread, wgaf, next.

So you're now sayIng it was Wilcox who fucked him up...thanks for the clarification
 
Actually, it seems very reasonable to say that Wilcox improved elements of the defense while at the same time failed to connect with certain players. Who on the coaching staff decided to give Shirley a shot after the laptop thing? Assuming Sark and Nansen. Like I said earlier in the thread, wgaf, next.

So you're now sayIng it was Wilcox who fucked him up...thanks for the clarification

Blame the coach no longer here! Shirley was no good anyway! We're better off without him!
Long live dawgman.com

 
Actually, it seems very reasonable to say that Wilcox improved elements of the defense while at the same time failed to connect with certain players. Who on the coaching staff decided to give Shirley a shot after the laptop thing? Assuming Sark and Nansen. Like I said earlier in the thread, wgaf, next.

So you're now sayIng it was Wilcox who fucked him up...thanks for the clarification

Blame the coach no longer here! Shirley was no good anyway! We're better off without him!
Long live dawgman.com

Pressing very badly in this thread. Yikes.
 
Actually, it seems very reasonable to say that Wilcox improved elements of the defense while at the same time failed to connect with certain players. Who on the coaching staff decided to give Shirley a shot after the laptop thing? Assuming Sark and Nansen. Like I said earlier in the thread, wgaf, next.

So you're now sayIng it was Wilcox who fucked him up...thanks for the clarification

Blame the coach no longer here! Shirley was no good anyway! We're better off without him!
Long live dawgman.com

Pressing very badly in this thread. Yikes.

surely you dont mean ME
 
Huh? That's what you pulled out of my posts. Christ man.

Just clarifying and pointing out you can't defend your Fucktarded statement that it was sarks fault he didn't live up to the hype. You were all over the place and contradicting yourself with every post. Next time just don't say anything rather than risk saying something stupid.
 
Last edited:
Confusion is all yours, you changed the subject to Wilcox. Nobody knows whether Shirley would've been a good player under Peterman this year, but the odds were that a former starter with +15 career sacks would have been a positive for the defense. Why would you think I'm defending Wilcox in all of this?
 
Last edited:
Josh Shirley was a "certain" NFL player when he signed at Washington according to Sark.

Who knows, perhaps he's just another lost soul with 'trust issues'... it happens... even to the best coaches in the country. Sometimes players just can't keep up at this level watcha gonna do?
 
I'm hearing Shirley was seen at the airport, by the baggage claim thingie. Just what I heard.

The what's-it-called deal? With the suitcases and shit?

Yeah, that thingie. The one that spins and magically presents me my underwear and smuggled cocaine.
 
Confusion is all yours, you changed the subject to Wilcox. Nobody knows whether Shirley would've been a good player under Peterman this year, but the odds were that a former starter with +15 career sacks would have been a positive for the defense. Why would you think I'm defending Wilcox in all of this?

You were blaming Sark.... My question is why did he regress?
 
Josh Shirley was a "certain" NFL player when he signed at Washington according to Sark.

Who knows, perhaps he's just another lost soul with 'trust issues'... it happens... even to the best coaches in the country. Sometimes players just can't keep up at this level watcha gonna do?

Sark couldn't have believed in him that much ... he didn't say that Shirley was surely going to be a Top 5 pick ... James Atoe ... FREE PUB!!!
 
Back
Top