Oregon Week!



North Cascades mysteriously absent

This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.

@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.

My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.

Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

16 vs 12. Interesting

WA has a shit load of 8k ones that barely miss the cut and are serious mountains, like Dragontail. Fun climb
 
Last edited:
North Cascades mysteriously absent

This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.

@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.

My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.

Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

North Cascades mysteriously absent

This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.

@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.

My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.

Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

North Cascades mysteriously absent

This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.

@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.

My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.

Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

16 vs 12. Interesting

WA has a shit load of 8k ones that barely miss the cut and our serious mountains, like Dragontail. Fun climb

We'd probably get along IRL. Just trying to inform here.
 
Last edited:
North Cascades mysteriously absent

This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.

@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.

My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.

Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

North Cascades mysteriously absent

This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.

@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.

My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.

Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

North Cascades mysteriously absent

This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.

@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.

My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.

Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

16 vs 12. Interesting

WA has a shit load of 8k ones that barely miss the cut and our serious mountains, like Dragontail. Fun climb

We'd probably get along IRL. Just trying to inform here.

For sure. Another factor against Oregon for me is the distance it takes to get there. Want to loan me your RV? Only moderate wear and tear from coke and strippers
 
maxresdefault.jpg


mic drop...
 
You all laugh, but this was a real live debate over at Doogman years back. It morphed into a state level debate where people were comparing / competing over which state had the better geographical topography and greater natural beauty. CastlerockRon/royotis was throwing down for Washington, arguing that Oregon just didn't have an answer for Mt. Rayonier. There were protracted arguments between morons over whether Olympic National Park was better than Crescent Lake, etc. etc.

This literally went on for months and people were taking it seriously.

So who won?!!

Washington, of course.

Lake Chelan was the tie breaker. The Oregonians had no answer.

I have to go with Oregon from a geological / topography perspective. I prefer Bachelor to any of the WA ski resorts although Seattle is way closer to Whistler. Oregon's wine country is way better than Washington's. Oregon coast is better too. The Bend / Sunriver area is fantastic.

Crystal and Baker are both ten times better than Bachelor what the actual fuck

Bachelor has way better vertical than either Crystal or Baker. They get plenty of snow. Far shorter lift lines than Crystal on the weekends.

Crystal is awful on the weekends. Most the day is spent in line and on the chairs.
 
North Cascades mysteriously absent

This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.

@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.

My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.

Sorry bruh - I take it personally when someone takes a jab at my mountain man street cred.

All kidding aside, of course Washington’s mountains and glacier carved lowlands are more impressive than Oregon. But my remark about geography was more a preference for the Oregon coast and the Bend / Sunriver area over anything comparable in WA.

Baker and Crystal both do some things better than Bachelor but overall the latter is the better mountain.
 
North Cascades mysteriously absent

This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.

@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.

My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.

Sorry bruh - I take it personally when someone takes a jab at my mountain man street cred.

All kidding aside, of course Washington’s mountains and glacier carved lowlands are more impressive than Oregon. But my remark about geography was more a preference for the Oregon coast and the Bend / Sunriver area over anything comparable in WA.

Baker and Crystal both do some things better than Bachelor but overall the latter is the better mountain.

One thing Crystal has that none of the others have, including Whistler, is a can't-get-closer view of a giant mother fucking volcano.
 
North Cascades mysteriously absent

This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.

@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.

My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.

Sorry bruh - I take it personally when someone takes a jab at my mountain man street cred.

All kidding aside, of course Washington’s mountains and glacier carved lowlands are more impressive than Oregon. But my remark about geography was more a preference for the Oregon coast and the Bend / Sunriver area over anything comparable in WA.

Baker and Crystal both do some things better than Bachelor but overall the latter is the better mountain.

One thing Crystal has that none of the others have, including Whistler, is a can't-get-closer view of a giant mother fucking volcano.

Tahoma TUFF.
 
Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA
 
Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA

Im sorry you live in fucking Virginia. That must be awful
 
Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA

Im sorry you live in fucking Virginia. That must be awful

You don't know what you're missing.

giphy.gif

 
Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA

Im sorry you live in fucking Virginia. That must be awful

You don't know what you're missing.

giphy.gif

Ive been to Virginia 4 times. I know exactly what Im missing and how bad the east coast sucks lol

I'll take purple Virginia over deep blue Washington any day. Only thing I miss from Washington is Dicks. Take that however.
 
I just realized you are trying to get me to fuck up my own thread with a new WA vs. VA debate.

giphy.gif

 
Back
Top