Official Debate game thread

Goduckies said:
CallMeBigErn said:
Goduckies said:
Wyoming, doesn't, Only in the Senate, Turbo
Click to expand...
I misread and misspoke on my original reply. Whatever. The bicameral system is good. Senate is good. House is probably fine. Electoral college, ehhhh. If you wanna explain why someone losing the popular vote should be president, have at it.
Click to expand...
Simple, California and New York shouldn't have say over the whole country.
Click to expand...
I'm simply pointing out that individual votes from Wyoming mean more in DC than individual votes from California. That's how it is. It ain't an opinion, it's math.
California/Wyoming
Population - 67/1
Senate - 1/1
House - 52/1
Electoral college - 18/1
If that triggers you, so be it.
 
CallMeBigErn said:
Goduckies said:
CallMeBigErn said:
Goduckies said:
Wyoming, doesn't, Only in the Senate, Turbo
Click to expand...
I misread and misspoke on my original reply. Whatever. The bicameral system is good. Senate is good. House is probably fine. Electoral college, ehhhh. If you wanna explain why someone losing the popular vote should be president, have at it.
Click to expand...
Simple, California and New York shouldn't have say over the whole country.
Click to expand...
I'm simply pointing out that individual votes from Wyoming mean more in DC than individual votes from California. That's how it is. It ain't an opinion, it's math.
California/Wyoming
Population - 67/1
Senate - 1/1
House - 52/1
Electoral college - 18/1
If that triggers you, so be it.
Click to expand...
You are welcome to attempt an amendment or convention to change it.
 
Again. Why should New York and California be the only ones to decide what works for the whole nation? There is a reason they wrote it like this. To give all states, large and small a say. Why are you against that?
 
There wouldn't have been united colonies or states without the University of Electoral and equal representation in the Senate. The House is the rabble where NY and Cali can put forth their malarkey
As Petersen could tell you it was hard to get 13 to agree but they set the template for 50 to agree
Now our defenders of democracy want to tear it down in a hissy fit whenever they don't get their way
 
Every lefty wants mob rule and nothing less. They know they can buy, extort and threaten to do whatever they want if they achieve it.
 
CallMeBigErn said:
Goduckies said:
CallMeBigErn said:
Goduckies said:
Wyoming, doesn't, Only in the Senate, Turbo
Click to expand...
I misread and misspoke on my original reply. Whatever. The bicameral system is good. Senate is good. House is probably fine. Electoral college, ehhhh. If you wanna explain why someone losing the popular vote should be president, have at it.
Click to expand...
Simple, California and New York shouldn't have say over the whole country.
Click to expand...
I'm simply pointing out that individual votes from Wyoming mean more in DC than individual votes from California. That's how it is. It ain't an opinion, it's math.
California/Wyoming
Population - 67/1
Senate - 1/1
House - 52/1
Electoral college - 18/1
If that triggers you, so be it.
Click to expand...
Didn't trigger me. You posted it as some sort of indictment of our system of government and called it "silly". Now you would like to pretend that you were just pointing it out for some unknown reason. It isn't silly, it is intentional and for good reasons. Fascist leftards don't like it for some reason.
 
RaceBannon said:
There wouldn't have been united colonies or states without the University of Electoral and equal representation in the Senate. The House is the rabble where NY and Cali can put forth their malarkey
As Petersen could tell you it was hard to get 13 to agree but they set the template for 50 to agree
Now our defenders of democracy want to tear it down in a hissy fit whenever they don't get their way
Click to expand...
Orban's Populism is a threat to democracy.
It's different when WE do it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top