Not sure about this indictment

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

is this linked to NY state law?

This is the NY statute verbatim.
 
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

What was the second crime?

At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.

Federal campaign finance law, got it.

 
34 COUNTS

FELONIES

Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty
 
34 COUNTS

FELONIES

Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty

You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.
 
H still thinks Mueller found something but let it slide

Like Comey did for Hillary

H is going to melt down when his daddy beats the bogus charges
 
I found a referencehttps://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.

I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone
 
Last edited:
I found a referencehttps://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.

I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone

It is the least compelling of the many prosecutions Daddy will face.
 
34 COUNTS

FELONIES

Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty

You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.

Juice! Juice! Juice!
 
I found a referencehttps://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/

I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link

They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.

Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.

I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone

It is the least compelling of the many prosecutions Daddy will face.

I really don't care about this one but "find me 10k votes or else" is a crime IMO
 
All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO

That's legal
 
All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO

That's legal

You could be Daddy's lawyer.

Well, as long as you don't expect to be paid that is.
 
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

What was the second crime?

At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.

See,[/i] John Edwards.

That the FEC declined.
 
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]

Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.

What was the second crime?

At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.

See,[/i] John Edwards.

That the FEC declined.

He was tried.
 
All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO

That's legal

You could be Daddy's lawyer.

Well, as long as you don't expect to be paid that is.

So it's a crime to lie ona loan application? There is a reason they have appraisers.
 
All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.

I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO

That's legal

You could be Daddy's lawyer.

Well, as long as you don't expect to be paid that is.

So it's a crime to lie ona loan application? [/b]There is a reason they have appraisers.

Things TugCons ask.

Ummmm, hate to break it to you, YES.

You might want to lawyer up.
 
Back
Top