HHusky
Active poster
Lol when this all gets downgraded to misdemeanors and like a fine the Dems might literally kill Bragg
Daddy's going to strike a plea deal? Artful!
Lol when this all gets downgraded to misdemeanors and like a fine the Dems might literally kill Bragg
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
is this linked to NY state law?
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
What was the second crime?
At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.
34 COUNTS
FELONIES
Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty
I found a referencehttps://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/
I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link
I found a referencehttps://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/
I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link
They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.
Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.
I found a referencehttps://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/
I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link
They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.
Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.
I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone
34 COUNTS
FELONIES
Not available in every state
Some restrictions may apply
An indictment is not a conviction
All people on this show are presumed innocent until proven guilty
You forgot that if found not guilty that doesn't exonerate him.
I found a referencehttps://law.justia.com/codes/new-york/2019/pen/part-3/title-k/article-175/175-10/
I think the weak part of this is the "an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof." It's a crime to jaywalk... the prosecution will fail to show the link
They might fail to show the link beyond a reasonable doubt.
Edwards got away with it. Jury deadlocked.
I guess they might get him if the defense bungles the case and jury sympathetic. My gut feel is it is weak, too technicality... but, they got Capone
It is the least compelling of the many prosecutions Daddy will face.
All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.
I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.
I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
That's legal
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
What was the second crime?
At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.
See,[/i] John Edwards.
§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.
A person is guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree
when he commits the crime of falsifying business records in the second
degree, and when his intent to defraud includes an intent to commit
another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.[/b]
Falsifying business records in the first degree is a class E felony.
What was the second crime?
At a minimum, campaign finance law violations.
See,[/i] John Edwards.
That the FEC declined.
All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.
I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
That's legal
You could be Daddy's lawyer.
Well, as long as you don't expect to be paid that is.
All charges are past statute of limitations and the federal government reviewed the case prior. What we are witnessing it utter insanity. The witnesses are stormy and Cohen. Total joke.
I think I agree with this crowd for once... charges look flimsy. They should have nailed him for exaggerating his assets, reducing values for taxes issues, this is weak... will fail IMO
That's legal
You could be Daddy's lawyer.
Well, as long as you don't expect to be paid that is.
So it's a crime to lie ona loan application? [/b]There is a reason they have appraisers.