Tequilla
Active poster
ahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival
what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys
at least winners win, right?
I was not defending Sark in Year 5 ... but go ahead and enjoy that parade on Tuesdayahh there it is, now just throw teq of 'defending sark into year 5 ' fame and salem 'derplord' coog in here and then we can put on a festival
what other lowest common denominator context-deprived team stats can we throw out there, boys
at least winners win, right?
I was not defending Sark in Year 5 ... but go ahead and enjoy that parade on Tuesday
You did.
Actually I didn’t ... I was one of the most vocal regarding firing him.
Too many confuse what I said Sark needed to do to keep his job after Year 5 as a sign of defending him ... not even close to the same thing
I remember you back to dawgman defending Sark. I'm sure you had some criticisms of him in your tl,dr posts, but you didn't call for him to very fired until the middle of year 5.
I was very critical of him after Year 3 and then he fired his defensive staff to buy himself more time
After Pete kicked his ass in Vegas it was fairly clear that he wasn’t the right coach to take UW to the next level ... that being said really hard for an AD to fire him at that point
Again, I think where you (and others) confuse what I say is that I don’t just randomly half ass call for people to be fired. I tend to treat those discussions as part of a resume and body of work.
What we will never know is whether Sark would have got fired after Year 5 (he should have) ... so praise be to Pat Haden