Ken Griswold has a change of heart

bananasnblondes

Active poster
Swaye's Wigwam
As many who have frequented dawgman in the past and have since swarmed to this board know, the CEO has had a long standing dislike for "negative posting". Questions like "Why is a coach who can't win more than 5 conference games not on the hot seat?" and "Why are we still getting blown out 3 times a year?" were made by individuals who are just negative people and wanted to bring the board down with their negativity. In many cases, "other posters were starting to complain" to mods about such negativity posting the boards and it was necessary to have "deleted stuff".

It appears that Griswold has had a change of heart in this matter. After a new poster compared Coach Petersen's leadership to "watching the sinking of the Titanic" and that Petersen"forcing Miles out" and "not utilizing Kasen" showed a real "lack of integrity". To quote the poster, a "good coach would have built on the foundation left by the previous staff".

At first, the post seemed destined to sink as most disregarded it. Then the CEO chose to bump the post by responding "Let's see who bites on this".

After a few people voiced their agitation, this appeared signaling that Griswold has changed his mind regarding freedom of speech on his boards:

"Ignoring stuff is more effective than engaging, getting pissed, and complaining to the mods. There's always going to be those who have fun engaging. Recognize stuff for what it is. "

Kim Grinolds

Unfortunately,when some of us chose to "have fun engaging" in the past, were no longer allowed to "engage"
 
I don't give a flying fuck what that cunt thinks. The question is why so many here do? I'm sure that faggit likes the attention more than an actual brb blonde.
 
If Kent Griswold had any balls at all, he'd lift all IP bans.

Until that he is just talking shit and not smoking weed like Lane Kiffen.

 
I don't give a flying fuck what that cunt thinks. The question is why so many here do? I'm sure that faggit likes the attention more than an actual brb blonde.

Do the math
 
He bumped it because he hates Petersen.

If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.

You guys know better.
 
He bumped it because he hates Petersen.

If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.

You guys know better.

I believe bananasnblondes had tongue firmly planted in cheek
 
How many times have there been first time posters complaining about Petersen since the jacket-in-the-office incident?

I'm guessing 81.

He bumped it because he hates Petersen.

If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster. wouldn't have created a new account and made the post to begin with.

You guys know better.

FTFY
 
Last edited:
anigif_enhanced-buzz-12214-1383683406-4.gif
 
He bumped it because he hates Petersen.

If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.

You guys know better.

U really r an idiot.

Takes one to know one.

At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points.
Try to have an independent thought.
Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?!
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.

Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.

And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame?
The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen.
 
He bumped it because he hates Petersen.

If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.

You guys know better.

U really r an idiot.

Takes one to know one.

At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points.
Try to have an independent thought.
Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?!
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.

Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.

And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame?
The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen.

About 2/3 of this board has been critical of Petersen.

But don't let that stop you from using terms like "scorched earth".
 

He bumped it because he hates Petersen.

If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.

You guys know better.

U really r an idiot.

Takes one to know one.
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.

Petersen isn't doing anything different this year, unless you're counting the fact that he's not just coming into the job in December. He's on record as saying that this is the system his staff runs, and it's the only system they know and they know it will work.

And Kim has reason enough to dislike Petersen when he says his TBS star-stroking job is a bunch of bullshit that his staff wants no part of.
 
He bumped it because he hates Petersen.

If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.

You guys know better.

U really r an idiot.

Takes one to know one.

At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points.
Try to have an independent thought.
Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?!
He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.

Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.

And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame?
The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen.

Kill yourself
 
Back
Top