DugtheDoog
New Fish
Beezlecunt: He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
[/QUOTE]
Are you really that dumb or were you born yesterday? Everyone, including Kent (hi Kim) knows that fallacy holds zero water and is just a made up argument for those who get kicked out of Peterman's office. Peterman's first class, which he had less than 2 months to put it together, was ranked 35th and closed out with four 4star kids with an average star ranking of 3. Not spectacular but by any level-headed, impartial observer, a very solid first class, not even taking into account the extremely limited time period.
Comparing Peterman's class to Sark's 5th class is comparing apples to oranges. But you already knew that. Nevermind that Peterman signed as many 4star kids and a had a higher avg star ranking in his first full class than Sark did in his 5th. But if you want to compare apples to apples, Sark's 2009 class was ranked 66th, signed one 4star and averaged 2.5 stars per player. And that's without taking into account the benefit of hindsight, where we now know that the 2009 class is far, far worse than 66th in actual results.
But, I mean, 0-12, right?
[/QUOTE]
Are you really that dumb or were you born yesterday? Everyone, including Kent (hi Kim) knows that fallacy holds zero water and is just a made up argument for those who get kicked out of Peterman's office. Peterman's first class, which he had less than 2 months to put it together, was ranked 35th and closed out with four 4star kids with an average star ranking of 3. Not spectacular but by any level-headed, impartial observer, a very solid first class, not even taking into account the extremely limited time period.
Comparing Peterman's class to Sark's 5th class is comparing apples to oranges. But you already knew that. Nevermind that Peterman signed as many 4star kids and a had a higher avg star ranking in his first full class than Sark did in his 5th. But if you want to compare apples to apples, Sark's 2009 class was ranked 66th, signed one 4star and averaged 2.5 stars per player. And that's without taking into account the benefit of hindsight, where we now know that the 2009 class is far, far worse than 66th in actual results.
But, I mean, 0-12, right?
Last edited: