It's not a bug; it's a feature.

[hardhat]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

That's really dumb, you know. The entire west coast is dominated by democrats, and they can do whatever they want. And as we've already pointed out, raising taxes just to do it isn't the answer. What is it that you want to raise the taxes for? Let's see some solid policy analysis. How much money is being spent on homelessness in Seattle? Should we spend more on that?

If you want to change the subject to local governance, start a new thread. This is about taxes at the federal level.

You blamed magatards for not having higher taxes. I pointed out that states can enact taxes, including estate taxes. Feel free to look that up anytime. And you know that innovation by a state can in fact lead to changes at the federal level.

 

[Swaye]

Inb4 @UW_Doog_Bot shows up to school the usual suspect

 

[RaceBannon]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

And yet the House has a larger majority than the Senate

This is the second time this century the democrats control the government

Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts

Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit

Other than you

No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.

You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball.

I voted for Trump who raised taxes on the rich and lowered mine

painfully ignorant

Truth

The Trump tax cuts raised taxes on the rich and lowered them on the middle despite the lies of the usual liars. I don't need talking points I have @CirrhosisDawg as a witness

He went into an epic meltdown about losing a lot of his high digit mortgage deduction and a lot of his his state income tax deduction and cried like a little girl about his taxes going up

I pointed out that mine went down

THAT'S BECAUSE YOU ARE POOR

A good attorney lets the witness make the case for him

Guess what Biden and the dems want to do first? Get rid of what raised the taxes of the California and NY rich

As we like to say go fuck yourself

 

[HHusky]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

And yet the House has a larger majority than the Senate

This is the second time this century the democrats control the government

Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts

Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit

Other than you

No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.

You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball.

I voted for Trump who raised taxes on the rich and lowered mine

painfully ignorant

Truth

The Trump tax cuts raised taxes on the rich and lowered them on the middle despite the lies of the usual liars. I don't need talking points I have @CirrhosisDawg as a witness

He went into an epic meltdown about losing a lot of his high digit mortgage deduction and a lot of his his state income tax deduction and cried like a little girl about his taxes going up

I pointed out that mine went down

THAT'S BECAUSE YOU ARE POOR

A good attorney lets the witness make the case for him

Guess what Biden and the dems want to do first? Get rid of what raised the taxes of the California and NY rich

As we like to say go fuck yourself

So your local resentments obscure the rest of the forest from your view. Figures.

 

[hardhat]

Bernie's been talking about 'taxing the rich' long before I was born, but he's done jack shit about it. When he did finally release his plans, the ugly truth is that the only way to truly pay for all these things is to raise payroll taxes on the middle class, by at least 9%. That was from non-partisan analysis. I don't hear anything coming out of Davos or the World Economic Forum about those fucktards paying more in taxes. Start there.

I agree with you that wealth should be taxed more heavily. And not starting at $50 million. I'd say $5 million. I think starting at $1 million (as Piketty proposed) is too aggressive.

So you agree, but still afraid to take off the team jersey?

I said I'm for a wealth tax more robust than Elizabeth Warren's. I'm not clear what team we're talking about.

Elizabeth Warren is full of shit.

 

[RaceBannon]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

And yet the House has a larger majority than the Senate

This is the second time this century the democrats control the government

Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts

Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit

Other than you

No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.

You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball.

I voted for Trump who raised taxes on the rich and lowered mine

painfully ignorant

Truth

The Trump tax cuts raised taxes on the rich and lowered them on the middle despite the lies of the usual liars. I don't need talking points I have @CirrhosisDawg as a witness

He went into an epic meltdown about losing a lot of his high digit mortgage deduction and a lot of his his state income tax deduction and cried like a little girl about his taxes going up

I pointed out that mine went down

THAT'S BECAUSE YOU ARE POOR

A good attorney lets the witness make the case for him

Guess what Biden and the dems want to do first? Get rid of what raised the taxes of the California and NY rich

As we like to say go fuck yourself

So your local resentments obscure the rest of the forest from your view. Figures.

Now the soundly defeated H enters his gibberish phase of denial and deflection

Fell free to point out what wasn't accurate

@CirrhosisDawg was honest about his non desire to pay higher taxes even though he is proudly rich

Refreshing

 

[hardhat]

View attachment 43575

 

[HHusky]

Bernie's been talking about 'taxing the rich' long before I was born, but he's done jack shit about it. When he did finally release his plans, the ugly truth is that the only way to truly pay for all these things is to raise payroll taxes on the middle class, by at least 9%. That was from non-partisan analysis. I don't hear anything coming out of Davos or the World Economic Forum about those fucktards paying more in taxes. Start there.

I agree with you that wealth should be taxed more heavily. And not starting at $50 million. I'd say $5 million. I think starting at $1 million (as Piketty proposed) is too aggressive.

So you agree, but still afraid to take off the team jersey?

I said I'm for a wealth tax more robust than Elizabeth Warren's. I'm not clear what team we're talking about.

Elizabeth Warren is full of shit.

But she would unable politically to oppose my wealth tax.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I don't think I should volunteer to subsidize them more than I already do.

You voted for this shit.

 

[HHusky]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

And yet the House has a larger majority than the Senate

This is the second time this century the democrats control the government

Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts

Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit

Other than you

No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.

You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball.

I voted for Trump who raised taxes on the rich and lowered mine

painfully ignorant

Truth

The Trump tax cuts raised taxes on the rich and lowered them on the middle despite the lies of the usual liars. I don't need talking points I have @CirrhosisDawg as a witness

He went into an epic meltdown about losing a lot of his high digit mortgage deduction and a lot of his his state income tax deduction and cried like a little girl about his taxes going up

I pointed out that mine went down

THAT'S BECAUSE YOU ARE POOR

A good attorney lets the witness make the case for him

Guess what Biden and the dems want to do first? Get rid of what raised the taxes of the California and NY rich

As we like to say go fuck yourself

So your local resentments obscure the rest of the forest from your view. Figures.

Now the soundly defeated H enters his gibberish phase of denial and deflection

Fell free to point out what wasn't accurate

@CirrhosisDawg was honest about his non desire to pay higher taxes even though he is proudly rich

Refreshing

Biden and the Dems want to raise federal tax rates AND alter the GOP's punishment of "coastal elites". Walk and chew gum at the same time?!?!

 

[HHusky]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I don't think I should volunteer to subsidize them more than I already do.

You voted for this shit.

Some of it. I've been voting for quite a few years.

 

[RaceBannon]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

And yet the House has a larger majority than the Senate

This is the second time this century the democrats control the government

Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts

Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit

Other than you

No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.

You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball.

I voted for Trump who raised taxes on the rich and lowered mine

painfully ignorant

Truth

The Trump tax cuts raised taxes on the rich and lowered them on the middle despite the lies of the usual liars. I don't need talking points I have @CirrhosisDawg as a witness

He went into an epic meltdown about losing a lot of his high digit mortgage deduction and a lot of his his state income tax deduction and cried like a little girl about his taxes going up

I pointed out that mine went down

THAT'S BECAUSE YOU ARE POOR

A good attorney lets the witness make the case for him

Guess what Biden and the dems want to do first? Get rid of what raised the taxes of the California and NY rich

As we like to say go fuck yourself

So your local resentments obscure the rest of the forest from your view. Figures.

Now the soundly defeated H enters his gibberish phase of denial and deflection

Fell free to point out what wasn't accurate

@CirrhosisDawg was honest about his non desire to pay higher taxes even though he is proudly rich

Refreshing

Biden and the Dems want to raise federal tax rates AND alter the GOP's punishment of "coastal elites". Walk and chew gum at the same time?!?!

Sure they do

What are they waiting for?

Why is raising the taxes on the rich in California a "punishment" and raising the taxes on everyone else a good idea?

Still flailing away I see

 

[HHusky]

A federal measure designed to raise taxes significantly in only[/b] blue states is punishment for being blue. That should be obvious even to you.

 

[RaceBannon]

A federal measure designed to raise taxes significantly in only[/b] blue states is punishment for being blue. That should be obvious even to you.

It eliminated deductions only available to the rich while lowering the taxes on the middle

That's what your party "claims" they want

We? all know they don't. They want federal taxpayers to cover the high state income taxes.

Next

 

[WestlinnDuck]

A federal measure designed to raise taxes in only[/b] blue states is punishment for being blue. That should be obvious even to you.

It isn't a tax on blue states. Just like New York taxes federal income taxes paid, the feds are taxing New Yorkers on state income tax paid. The real question is why does New York or California have such high taxes and such a sh*tty public school system and can't pick up the garbage. The other question is why does Schumer and Pelosi want to cut the federal income taxes for the wealthy. Or why don't you start cutting a check for your "fair share" of taxes.

 

[HHusky]

A federal measure designed to raise taxes in only[/b] blue states is punishment for being blue. That should be obvious even to you.

It isn't a tax on blue states. Just like New York taxes federal income taxes paid, the feds are taxing New Yorkers on state income tax paid. The real question is why does New York or California have such high taxes and such a sh*tty public school system and can't pick up the garbage. The other question is why does Schumer and Pelosi want to cut the federal income taxes for the wealthy. Or why don't you start cutting a check for your "fair share" of taxes.

I've told you before, Gasbag. Because my goal isn't to raise only my taxes.

It's not as if you looked at the deficit and said, "Keep my tax cut." But supposedly you want a lower deficit.

 

[RaceBannon]

Lower spending

Almost 8 trillion in revenue in 2019

That's enough

 

[HHusky]

Lower spending

Almost 8 trillion in revenue in 2019

That's enough

Spending isn't going to go down. Once you acknowledge obvious truths, you can come to better policy decisions.

 

[Sledog]

Bernie's been talking about 'taxing the rich' long before I was born, but he's done jack shit about it. When he did finally release his plans, the ugly truth is that the only way to truly pay for all these things is to raise payroll taxes on the middle class, by at least 9%. That was from non-partisan analysis. I don't hear anything coming out of Davos or the World Economic Forum about those fucktards paying more in taxes. Start there.

I agree with you that wealth should be taxed more heavily. And not starting at $50 million. I'd say $5 million. I think starting at $1 million (as Piketty proposed) is too aggressive.

There is that equal treatment under the law stuff. Damn constitution.

 

[HHusky]

Bernie's been talking about 'taxing the rich' long before I was born, but he's done jack shit about it. When he did finally release his plans, the ugly truth is that the only way to truly pay for all these things is to raise payroll taxes on the middle class, by at least 9%. That was from non-partisan analysis. I don't hear anything coming out of Davos or the World Economic Forum about those fucktards paying more in taxes. Start there.

I agree with you that wealth should be taxed more heavily. And not starting at $50 million. I'd say $5 million. I think starting at $1 million (as Piketty proposed) is too aggressive.

There is that equal treatment under the law stuff. Damn constitution.

Another voice for taxing capital gains at ordinary income rates!