It's not a bug; it's a feature.

[hardhat]

Tell us more about estate and inheritance taxes dude. Why doesn't every state have them? Do they incentivize investment? Do they help or just provide a way for people to carve out exemptions, trusts, and other ways to avoid them? I'm sure you're an expert in this area.

 

[HHusky]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I don't think I should volunteer to subsidize them more than I already do.

 

[HHusky]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

I wasn't asking them to pay me. Logic much?

 

[RaceBannon]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Why not? You need to pay your fair share man

 

[hardhat]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

 

[HHusky]

Bernie's been talking about 'taxing the rich' long before I was born, but he's done jack shit about it. When he did finally release his plans, the ugly truth is that the only way to truly pay for all these things is to raise payroll taxes on the middle class, by at least 9%. That was from non-partisan analysis. I don't hear anything coming out of Davos or the World Economic Forum about those fucktards paying more in taxes. Start there.

I agree with you that wealth should be taxed more heavily. And not starting at $50 million. I'd say $5 million. I think starting at $1 million (as Piketty proposed) is too aggressive.

 

[SFGbob]

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1441035059230818305?s=20

Dazzler jumped in with both feet on everyone of those stories. Weird how he never talks about that.

 

[RaceBannon]

Less taxes and less spending. We don't have a revenue problem we have a spending problem - Ronald Reagan who H allegedly voted for

 

[hardhat]

Bernie's been talking about 'taxing the rich' long before I was born, but he's done jack shit about it. When he did finally release his plans, the ugly truth is that the only way to truly pay for all these things is to raise payroll taxes on the middle class, by at least 9%. That was from non-partisan analysis. I don't hear anything coming out of Davos or the World Economic Forum about those fucktards paying more in taxes. Start there.

I agree with you that wealth should be taxed more heavily. And not starting at $50 million. I'd say $5 million. I think starting at $1 million (as Piketty proposed) is too aggressive.

So you agree, but still afraid to take off the team jersey?

 

[HHusky]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

 

[RaceBannon]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

And yet the House has a larger majority than the Senate

This is the second time this century the democrats control the government

Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts

Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit

Other than you

 

[SFGbob]

Like a child the Dazzler actually believes data and numbers reported by this White House.

 

[HHusky]

Bernie's been talking about 'taxing the rich' long before I was born, but he's done jack shit about it. When he did finally release his plans, the ugly truth is that the only way to truly pay for all these things is to raise payroll taxes on the middle class, by at least 9%. That was from non-partisan analysis. I don't hear anything coming out of Davos or the World Economic Forum about those fucktards paying more in taxes. Start there.

I agree with you that wealth should be taxed more heavily. And not starting at $50 million. I'd say $5 million. I think starting at $1 million (as Piketty proposed) is too aggressive.

So you agree, but still afraid to take off the team jersey?

I said I'm for a wealth tax more robust than Elizabeth Warren's. I'm not clear what team we're talking about.

 

[HHusky]

Like a child the Dazzler actually believes data and numbers reported by this White House.

Unrealized capital gains are like icebergs. Imagine taking them into account.

 

[hardhat]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

That's really dumb, you know. The entire west coast is dominated by democrats, and they can do whatever they want. And as we've already pointed out, raising taxes just to do it isn't the answer. What is it that you want to raise the taxes for? Let's see some solid policy analysis. How much money is being spent on homelessness in Seattle? Should we spend more on that?

 

[SFGbob]

Like a child the Dazzler actually believes data and numbers reported by this White House.

Unrealized capital gains are like icebergs. Imagine taking them into account.

Imagine believing anything that's put out by this White House. It would be like actually believing anything you say Dazzler. George Will said that Republicans physically fear for their safety from their own voters. [/i]

 

[HHusky]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

And yet the House has a larger majority than the Senate

This is the second time this century the democrats control the government

Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts

Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit

Other than you

No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.

You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball.

 

[HHusky]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

That's really dumb, you know. The entire west coast is dominated by democrats, and they can do whatever they want. And as we've already pointed out, raising taxes just to do it isn't the answer. What is it that you want to raise the taxes for? Let's see some solid policy analysis. How much money is being spent on homelessness in Seattle? Should we spend more on that?

If you want to change the subject to local governance, start a new thread. This is about taxes at the federal level.

 

[RaceBannon]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

And yet the House has a larger majority than the Senate

This is the second time this century the democrats control the government

Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts

Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit

Other than you

No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.

You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball.

Where is the bill for Biden to sign you lying hack?

Where is Joe calling for it

Move the goalposts

I vote like 7 trillion a year is enough revenue

I voted for Trump who raised taxes on the rich and lowered mine

I'm not a dumbfuck Biden voter like you

 

[HHusky]

Hmmm. I wonder why we "leftists" won't just pay more voluntarily. Eh, Gasbag?

I also wonder why you self-professed undertaxed leftards don't voluntarily pay more tax. You should know better than me since I'm not the phucking hypocrite that you are. So, the top 1% of taxable US income earners pay 40% of the federal income tax. In February 2020 let us know what was wrong with the US economy which was generating the highest increase in US middle income wages in decades. Not enough tax revenue to fund public education which sucks? The actual truth is that the "income" of the wealthy doesn't include increases in their investment portfolio. When they die, this "untaxed" wealth is subject to a 40% federal estate tax rate. For some reason, the ultra red state of California doesn't have an estate tax. You should fix that. You suck at this.

The White House noted that its estimate of the tax rate for the wealthiest households is "much lower" than other groups' estimates of top income tax rates. The administration's takes into account income from unrealized capital gains, which is not typically included in this type of analysis.[/b]

A permanent upper class defined by large, lightly taxed inheritances is perfectly fine with Gasbag.

How much of other peoples money are you entitled to there fagbag? What's your estimate?

The dazzler would say a whole bunch of his money but he would only do so at gunpoint. That's the way he rolls.

My effective federal income tax rate is a lot higher than any [/b] estimate of the 400 wealthiest families' effective rate. I'm don't think I should subsidize them more than I already do.

Noted. But you know that's not going to change, and Bernie, Elizabeth Warren, and AOC are no different than any of the republicans that you blame for this problem.

It's not going to change as long as lower middle class whites from sparsely populated rural districts vote GOP or Manchin.

And yet the House has a larger majority than the Senate

This is the second time this century the democrats control the government

Obama did NOT get rid of the Bush tax cuts and Biden will NOT get rid of the Trump tax cuts

Not sure why you think anyone still falls for this bullshit

Other than you

No one thinks anything is going to change as things stand. But lying about whether Joe Biden would sign a bill to eliminate the Trump tax cuts insults even Sled's intelligence.

You vote like you want things to get worse. I vote and contribute to candidates who I think would advance the ball.

I voted for Trump who raised taxes on the rich and lowered mine

painfully ignorant