Husky Jacks open thread [2025]

@creepycoug

images
 
@creepycoug
Well on that case this board would be terrified of him scrambling for every 3rd and 4th down.
What do I care about in a QB?
I want one that can throw the ball accurately down field. 6th in completion percentage and 4th in yards/pass.
I want one that can run. 10th in QB rushing yards
I want one that can score points. UW 2nd in points/game
Maybe you would like Will Rogers back though
 
Canadawg said:
@creepycoug
Well on that case this board would be terrified of him scrambling for every 3rd and 4th down.
What do I care about in a QB?
I want one that can throw the ball accurately down field. 6th in completion percentage and 4th in yards/pass.
I want one that can run. 10th in QB rushing yards
I want one that can score points. UW 2nd in points/game
Maybe you would like Will Rogers back though
Click to expand...
You went through all that trouble to list of bunch of things to make a point you don't need to make.

"Still, Demond is a talent …."
I ask again in the name of clarity: do you look for QBs who are relatively short? Will Rodgers has nothing to do with it; the world is full of shitty QBs who are tall.
Just play the Duck game I set up for gravey and I think the clouds will part and it will all suddenly become clear for you.
 
Last edited:
creepycoug said:
Canadawg said:
@creepycoug
Well on that case this board would be terrified of him scrambling for every 3rd and 4th down.
What do I care about in a QB?
I want one that can throw the ball accurately down field. 6th in completion percentage and 4th in yards/pass.
I want one that can run. 10th in QB rushing yards
I want one that can score points. UW 2nd in points/game
Maybe you would like Will Rogers back though
Click to expand...
You went through all that trouble to list of bunch of things to make a point you don't need to make.

"Still, Demond is a talent …."
I ask again in the name of clarity: do you look for QBs who are relatively short? Will Rodgers has nothing to do with it; the world is full of shitty QBs who are tall.
Just play the Duck game I set up for gravey and I think the clouds will part and it will all suddenly become clear for you.
Click to expand...
Whatever point you're trying to coyly make is absurd and has no basis. Demond is really good and you trying to poke holes in it doesn't make you smart regardless of how many paragraphs you write about it
 
Canadawg said:
creepycoug said:
Canadawg said:
@creepycoug
Well on that case this board would be terrified of him scrambling for every 3rd and 4th down.
What do I care about in a QB?
I want one that can throw the ball accurately down field. 6th in completion percentage and 4th in yards/pass.
I want one that can run. 10th in QB rushing yards
I want one that can score points. UW 2nd in points/game
Maybe you would like Will Rogers back though
Click to expand...
You went through all that trouble to list of bunch of things to make a point you don't need to make.

"Still, Demond is a talent …."
I ask again in the name of clarity: do you look for QBs who are relatively short? Will Rodgers has nothing to do with it; the world is full of shitty QBs who are tall.
Just play the Duck game I set up for gravey and I think the clouds will part and it will all suddenly become clear for you.
Click to expand...
Whatever point you're trying to coyly make is absurd and has no basis. Demond is really good and you trying to poke holes in it doesn't make you smart regardless of how many paragraphs you write about it
Click to expand...
Creep's only point is Demond is not the ideal size for a QB. Suburban said he is EVERYTHING you want (not able to do EVERYTHING you want). He is standing against an obviously poor choice of words. May I suggest a remedial reading class or a sub 100 college level logic course?
 
Last edited:
EwaDawg said:
Canadawg said:
creepycoug said:
Canadawg said:
@creepycoug
Well on that case this board would be terrified of him scrambling for every 3rd and 4th down.
What do I care about in a QB?
I want one that can throw the ball accurately down field. 6th in completion percentage and 4th in yards/pass.
I want one that can run. 10th in QB rushing yards
I want one that can score points. UW 2nd in points/game
Maybe you would like Will Rogers back though
Click to expand...
You went through all that trouble to list of bunch of things to make a point you don't need to make.

"Still, Demond is a talent …."
I ask again in the name of clarity: do you look for QBs who are relatively short? Will Rodgers has nothing to do with it; the world is full of shitty QBs who are tall.
Just play the Duck game I set up for gravey and I think the clouds will part and it will all suddenly become clear for you.
Click to expand...
Whatever point you're trying to coyly make is absurd and has no basis. Demond is really good and you trying to poke holes in it doesn't make you smart regardless of how many paragraphs you write about it
Click to expand...
Creep's only point is Demond is not the ideal size for a QB. Suburban said he is EVERYTHING you want (not able to do EVERYTHING you want). He is standing against an obviously poor choice of words. May I suggest a remedial reading class or a sub 100 college level logic course?
Click to expand...
Yeah Demond can't run the way he does if he's 6'4" obviously. So id say he is everything you want. Manning prototype is dead
 
@Canadawg I was thinking the same, 4 inches taller and he doesn’t have the same speed and athleticism. I get both sides of the argument but the difference is “who gives a rip” about his professional measurables. Sure we want our dawgs doing well in the pros, my alligence is to Warshington dammit!
 
Canadawg said:
creepycoug said:
Canadawg said:
@creepycoug
Well on that case this board would be terrified of him scrambling for every 3rd and 4th down.
What do I care about in a QB?
I want one that can throw the ball accurately down field. 6th in completion percentage and 4th in yards/pass.
I want one that can run. 10th in QB rushing yards
I want one that can score points. UW 2nd in points/game
Maybe you would like Will Rogers back though
Click to expand...
You went through all that trouble to list of bunch of things to make a point you don't need to make.

"Still, Demond is a talent …."
I ask again in the name of clarity: do you look for QBs who are relatively short? Will Rodgers has nothing to do with it; the world is full of shitty QBs who are tall.
Just play the Duck game I set up for gravey and I think the clouds will part and it will all suddenly become clear for you.
Click to expand...
Whatever point you're trying to coyly make is absurd and has no basis. Demond is really good and you trying to poke holes in it doesn't make you smart regardless of how many paragraphs you write about it
Click to expand...
you can't read, at all, and apparently don't know what the words "coy" and "everything" mean. is this a general problem in Canada? you really should try the game and pretend the kid plays for a program you don't like.
moving on. I don't want to you see you start crying super fan.
 
Last edited:
graveyardDEADdawg said:
@Canadawg I was thinking the same, 4 inches taller and he doesn’t have the same speed and athleticism. I get both sides of the argument but the difference is “who gives a rip” about his professional measurables. Sure we want our dawgs doing well in the pros, my alligence is to Warshington dammit!
Click to expand...
Plenty of QBs with athleticism and speed who were 6 feet tall or better. Nobody said anything about pro measurables or Payton Manning or making Demond slower. It was a simple point that I now regret making. It is just ostensibly harder to play in the pocket when you're under 6 feet tall than it is when you're not, and he is mostly definitely under 6 feet tall. It is also harder to be a successful MLB pitcher when you're under 6 feet tall but Tim Lincecum did it. Does that mean that MLB scouts no longer look for size when they are scouting pitchers? No, it doesn't.
You with me yet?
 
Last edited:
creepycoug said:
graveyardDEADdawg said:
@Canadawg I was thinking the same, 4 inches taller and he doesn’t have the same speed and athleticism. I get both sides of the argument but the difference is “who gives a rip” about his professional measurables. Sure we want our dawgs doing well in the pros, my alligence is to Warshington dammit!
Click to expand...
Plenty of QBs with athleticism and speed who were 6 feet tall or better. Nobody said anything about pro measurables or Payton Manning or making Demond slower. It was a simple point that I now regret making. It is just ostensibly harder to play in the pocket when you're under 6 feet tall than it is when you're not, and he is mostly definitely under 6 feet tall. It is also harder to be a successful MLB pitcher when you're under 6 feet tall but Tim Lincecum did it. Does that mean that MLB scouts no longer look for size when they are scouting pitchers? No, it doesn't.
You with me yet?
Click to expand...
I have expressed concern for his inability to deliver the ball on occasion when he has time in the pocket. Not sure how much is his vision vs WRs not getting open. Either way it will be interesting
 
creepycoug said:
graveyardDEADdawg said:
@Canadawg I was thinking the same, 4 inches taller and he doesn’t have the same speed and athleticism. I get both sides of the argument but the difference is “who gives a rip” about his professional measurables. Sure we want our dawgs doing well in the pros, my alligence is to Warshington dammit!
Click to expand...
Plenty of QBs with athleticism and speed who were 6 feet tall or better. Nobody said anything about pro measurables or Payton Manning or making Demond slower. It was a simple point that I now regret making. It is just ostensibly harder to play in the pocket when you're under 6 feet tall than it is when you're not, and he is mostly definitely under 6 feet tall. It is also harder to be a successful MLB pitcher when you're under 6 feet tall but Tim Lincecum did it. Does that mean that MLB scouts no longer look for size when they are scouting pitchers? No, it doesn't.
You with me yet?
Click to expand...
I didn’t recall your original point but I don’t believe I disagree. When most of your O-line is 6’5” it’s obvious being over 6 feet would be advantageous. My counter argument was there have been plenty of shorter guys that had great success at the ncaa level. That qb from Vandy from Netflix’s is a baller and he must be an inch or 2 under 6’0”
lol I keep wanting this thread to die while bumping it. I’m guessing more than a few wouldn’t remember or even know about the Flutie gif I attempted to smack you with in good fun. How about all three of us stop bumping this shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top