Lets see who besides Texas will do it!
When the federal government has decided to do nothing and actually encourage illegal crossings, don't blame the vigilantes when they decide to act.Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
I haven’t read the bill. Do you mean to say that TX residents have the right to effect deportation as some sort of citizens arrest measure?Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
Sorry I don't get in the weeds on things like that.Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
I was curious what response that would generate from our resident soldiers of fortune. Bend sorta took it where I wanted. The tweet made the impression that it was vigilante shit. "Texans". SB4 ain't that. It's state and local enforcement of federal immigration law, in theory. Some people might get the wrong impression though. Not here, just in general. We don't want that.Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
![]()
Ok coolI was curious what response that would generate from our resident soldiers of fortune. Bend sorta took it where I wanted. The tweet made the impression that it was vigilante shit. "Texans". SB4 ain't that. It's state and local enforcement of federal immigration law, in theory. Some people might get the wrong impression though. Not here, just in general. We don't want that.Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
![]()
Thanks for the dissertation, Plato.I was curious what response that would generate from our resident soldiers of fortune. Bend sorta took it where I wanted. The tweet made the impression that it was vigilante shit. "Texans". SB4 ain't that. It's state and local enforcement of federal immigration law, in theory. Some people might get the wrong impression though. Not here, just in general. We don't want that.Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
![]()
Can't be having that.We wouldn’t want people to get the wrong impression.
Maybe not Plato, but BW would agree that everyone at the border should ride bikes, smoke buds, and collaborate around our awesome and great desert landscapes. They're incredible. The magnificent Rio Grande Valley, wow. Throw it down. The great Sonoran Desert, Anza Borrego, the mighty Joshua tree, the transcendent Saguaro, wow, throw it down one more time for the Sedona sunrise and twilight.Thanks for the dissertation, Plato.I was curious what response that would generate from our resident soldiers of fortune. Bend sorta took it where I wanted. The tweet made the impression that it was vigilante shit. "Texans". SB4 ain't that. It's state and local enforcement of federal immigration law, in theory. Some people might get the wrong impression though. Not here, just in general. We don't want that.Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
![]()
It didn't say that anywhere. Why would you assume? You know what assume means.Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
The magabot tweet said "Texans" and I half-heartedly baited the Cliven/Ammon Bundys of this forum. It didn't work that great, it wasn't the best, but let me cook. You know the type, I know the type.It didn't say that anywhere. Why would you assume? You know what assume means.Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
I'm having trouble reading you J. Who are you? You're the funniest motherfucker on this entire forum but you're also a conservative gay rolling stone living on a swamp boat in the Everglades with a cat? Wherever you lay your hat is your home? Am I getting my stories mixed up? I have nothing against you being a gay conservative cat-loving swamp boat captain roaming the Everglades. I would actually support it and can see the appeal. Teach me.Thanks for the dissertation, Plato.I was curious what response that would generate from our resident soldiers of fortune. Bend sorta took it where I wanted. The tweet made the impression that it was vigilante shit. "Texans". SB4 ain't that. It's state and local enforcement of federal immigration law, in theory. Some people might get the wrong impression though. Not here, just in general. We don't want that.Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.
![]()
It did not. It was an abbreviation, Txs, a poor one but I never thought it meant "Texas citizens". Texas law enforcement yep. But since citizen arrests are quite real I imagine Texans certainly could do that since it is a crime.The magabot tweet said "Texans" and I half-heartedly baited the Cliven/Ammon Bundys of this forum. It didn't work that great, it wasn't the best, but let me cook. You know the type, I know the type.It didn't say that anywhere. Why would you assume? You know what assume means.Texan citizens having the right to detain, arrest, and expel. How do we feel about this idea? It seems popular, but we should think about it.