How the f has Arizona not finished...

Well, we both agree she didn't really change her mind. If you want to quibble about whether she literally said she did or not, you aren't really disputing my point. She did call for the repeal of the "great law" she had previously cited.

Kari Lake calls legislators in push to repeal Arizona abortion ban she previously backed

My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?
 
Last edited:
I have never seen a man get as riled up over murdering babies as @HHusky. He can’t help himself, and in this thread, he’s making things up that Kari Lake never said.
Very odd how bloodthirsty he is as a male who will never get to legally kill another human. He cares more than most women, the majority who are as passionate about it are single, childless sluts who can’t keep their legs closed.
It is a tell, H.
 
HHusky said:
Well, we both agree she didn't really change her mind. If you want to quibble about whether she literally said she did or not, you aren't really disputing my point. She did call for the repeal of the "great law" she had previously cited.

Kari Lake calls legislators in push to repeal Arizona abortion ban she previously backed

My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?
Click to expand...
No we do not agree, she stated and restated her beliefs outright, you tried to imply she did change her mind, and flipflopped your position. 🤔
she is restricted to what she can and cannot do in office and has to take action according to the laws. Lobbying for support for or against something and making compromises to attain certain administrative goals is called politics!
Newsflash.. Democrats are also using this practice while you are throwing stones at Republicans for it.
If she is distancing herself you should ask her instead of what a reporter is saying he heard from somebody who may or may not agree with her position.
You stated yourself "you have people" I you really want the truth, get her statement directly from her mouth instead of from a biased 2nd 3rd hand or whatever and discern for yourself if you believe her or not.
Usually you can tell if an article is a hit piece when they wont name names and directly quote someone on record. That way there is no accountability. Backstabbing 101
 
Blueduck said:
HHusky said:
Well, we both agree she didn't really change her mind. If you want to quibble about whether she literally said she did or not, you aren't really disputing my point. She did call for the repeal of the "great law" she had previously cited.

Kari Lake calls legislators in push to repeal Arizona abortion ban she previously backed

My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?
Click to expand...
No we do not agree, she stated and restated her beliefs outright, you tried to imply she did change her mind, and flipflopped your position. 🤔
she is restricted to what she can and cannot do in office and has to take action according to the laws. Lobbying for support for or against something and making compromises to attain certain administrative goals is called politics!
Newsflash.. Democrats are also using this practice while you are throwing stones at Republicans for it.
If she is distancing herself you should ask her instead of what a reporter is saying he heard from somebody who may or may not agree with her position.
You stated yourself "you have people" I you really want the truth, get her statement directly from her mouth instead of from a biased 2nd 3rd hand or whatever and discern for yourself if you believe her or not.
Usually you can tell if an article is a hit piece when they wont name names and directly quote someone on record. That way there is no accountability. Backstabbing 101
Click to expand...
So you see her losing as evidence of the election being stolen from her. Okay.
 
EverettChris said:
I have never seen a man get as riled up over murdering babies as @HHusky. He can’t help himself, and in this thread, he’s making things up that Kari Lake never said.
Very odd how bloodthirsty he is as a male who will never get to legally kill another human. He cares more than most women, the majority who are as passionate about it are single, childless sluts who can’t keep their legs closed.
It is a tell, H.
Click to expand...
Abortion isn’t the subject of this thread, Chrissy. Kari Lake’s underperformance with Daddy’s voters is.
 
HHusky said:
Blueduck said:
HHusky said:
Well, we both agree she didn't really change her mind. If you want to quibble about whether she literally said she did or not, you aren't really disputing my point. She did call for the repeal of the "great law" she had previously cited.

Kari Lake calls legislators in push to repeal Arizona abortion ban she previously backed

My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?
Click to expand...
No we do not agree, she stated and restated her beliefs outright, you tried to imply she did change her mind, and flipflopped your position. 🤔
she is restricted to what she can and cannot do in office and has to take action according to the laws. Lobbying for support for or against something and making compromises to attain certain administrative goals is called politics!
Newsflash.. Democrats are also using this practice while you are throwing stones at Republicans for it.
If she is distancing herself you should ask her instead of what a reporter is saying he heard from somebody who may or may not agree with her position.
You stated yourself "you have people" I you really want the truth, get her statement directly from her mouth instead of from a biased 2nd 3rd hand or whatever and discern for yourself if you believe her or not.
Usually you can tell if an article is a hit piece when they wont name names and directly quote someone on record. That way there is no accountability. Backstabbing 101
Click to expand...
So you see her losing as evidence of the election being stolen from her. Okay.
Click to expand...
You putting words in someone mouth is just what you attempted to do to Kari Lake and got called on it and now you are trying to do it to me? 😂 DTM!
Edit..we know who is cooking the books!
 
Last edited:
HHusky said:
EverettChris said:
I have never seen a man get as riled up over murdering babies as @HHusky. He can’t help himself, and in this thread, he’s making things up that Kari Lake never said.
Very odd how bloodthirsty he is as a male who will never get to legally kill another human. He cares more than most women, the majority who are as passionate about it are single, childless sluts who can’t keep their legs closed.
It is a tell, H.
Click to expand...
Abortion isn’t the subject of this thread, Chrissy. Kari Lake’s underperformance with Daddy’s voters is.
Click to expand...
Then why are you so riled up about Lake’s words about abortion that you’ve assigned meaning to, Margaret?
You get so upset about abortion posts. It’s weird for a man in his 60s to act this way.
 
@Blueduck
I said:
My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?
Your answer was no. I’m not putting words in your mouth.
 
Last edited:
EverettChris said:
HHusky said:
EverettChris said:
I have never seen a man get as riled up over murdering babies as @HHusky. He can’t help himself, and in this thread, he’s making things up that Kari Lake never said.
Very odd how bloodthirsty he is as a male who will never get to legally kill another human. He cares more than most women, the majority who are as passionate about it are single, childless sluts who can’t keep their legs closed.
It is a tell, H.
Click to expand...
Abortion isn’t the subject of this thread, Chrissy. Kari Lake’s underperformance with Daddy’s voters is.
Click to expand...
Then why are you so riled up about Lake’s words about abortion that you’ve assigned meaning to, Margaret?
You get so upset about abortion posts. It’s weird for a man in his 60s to act this way.
Click to expand...
Abortion is an issue she lost some Republican votes on. That is among the reasons she is likely to lose.
 
HHusky said:
@Blueduck
I said:
My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?
Your answer was no. I’m not putting words in your mouth.
Click to expand...
There you go moving the goalposts again. Let's look at what your point was when I said "enlighten me" after you said I missed the point...
This was your response....
Calling 60 - 70% of the electorate sinners or, at least, sinful isn’t the best political strategy. Also, saying you “changed [your] mind” a mere two years later actually makes you look even worse.

There is nothing in that response about ...
My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?
You said ...
Well, we both agree she didn't really change her mind. If you want to quibble about whether she literally said she did or not, you aren't really disputing my point. She did call for the repeal of the "great law" she had previously cited.
I said I didn't agree that we agreed because you flip-flopped from her saying it versus that's what you assumed she meant.
Now you are changing the whole thing and saying..

So you see her losing as evidence of the election being stolen from her. Okay.
Never once did I say anything about any evidence having to do with here winning or losing nor was it in your "enlightening explanation" of your point.
This is absolutely ridiculous and you are so freaking dishonest and ARE trying to put word in my mouth.
-100 and screw you!
DTM
 
Blueduck said:
HHusky said:
@Blueduck
I said:
My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?
Your answer was no. I’m not putting words in your mouth.
Click to expand...
There you go moving the goalposts again. Let's look at what your point was when I said "enlighten me" after you said I missed the point...
This was your response....
Calling 60 - 70% of the electorate sinners or, at least, sinful isn’t the best political strategy. Also, saying you “changed [your] mind” a mere two years later actually makes you look even worse.

There is nothing in that response about ...
My point throughout has been that her trailing is being used as supposed "evidence" of election fraud. It isn't good evidence of that at all. Do we agree on that?
You said ...
Well, we both agree she didn't really change her mind. If you want to quibble about whether she literally said she did or not, you aren't really disputing my point. She did call for the repeal of the "great law" she had previously cited.
I said I didn't agree that we agreed because you flip-flopped from her saying it versus that's what you assumed she meant.
Now you are changing the whole thing and saying..

So you see her losing as evidence of the election being stolen from her. Okay.
Never once did I say anything about any evidence having to do with here winning or losing nor was it in your "enlightening explanation" of your point.
This is absolutely ridiculous and you are so freaking dishonest and ARE trying to put word in my mouth.
-100 and screw you!
DTM
Click to expand...
So you want to take both sides of a yes or no question. You seem a little touchy about it though. I suspect you grasp the problem with it.
 
@HHusky
DTM means Dead To Me
You have zero credibility and have earned the one and only "fuck off" I have given to anyone.
You earned it!
You misrepresented your source as fact and when you got called on it you changed the whole discussion into a word games and are now trying to trap me into a position that was never part of your "point" that you couldn't back up and I have never commented in regard to.
You should be banned from this site for this despicable behavior. You are dishonest and do not deserve one more comment from me.
I reject any comment, assumptions or false implication of my opinion that I have not explicitly expressed that you make prior to or following this poast.
You are..... DTM !
Good day!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top