Dnc, please educate me on why a coach doesn't need 5 years. There was a coach named Bruce snyder, you were den leader in the boy scouts then (at age 30). He had two teams in the top 10 back-to-back, and one a snap away from a national title. If not for a 5th year it wouldn't have happened. It's a tried and true formula. Obviously Sark failed because he's a shitty head coach. The principle is the same however. Dick Baird is a believer and he's a coach. You're a delivery driver for frito-lay. Clue up and check back in 5 bitch
You have used the Bruce Snyder example many times. I hope Chris Petersen does better than Bruce Snyder did. Great, Snyder had a good year in his fifth season at Cal and ASU, and did mediocre or shitty the rest of the time. Since Bruce Snyder had a great fifth year, it means all coaches do. Great argument. He won more than 6 games only four times out of fourteen seasons at Cal and ASU. That's the goal?
DIAFF for using Dick Baird as an example for anything. He's a fucking moron. He thinks no coaches should ever get fired. You're disappointing me Puppy. I really hope this is your fucktarded brother posting again.
Last edited: