Found this on wearesc.com

HuskyJW

HuskyJW

Swaye's Wigwam
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
Worst spring game performance I've ever seen. The schemes on offense are simplistic and unimaginative. And should be easily countered. Quarterbacks looked hesitant and held onto the ball too long. Offensive line lacks discipline and is porous. The team looked as if they were going at 80% speed and intensity, maybe a result of lack of tackling in practice. The entire offense looks gimmicky as if Sark is betting that simply running plays fast-and they weren't running plays that fast, will make up for a lack of imagination and poor execution on offense. Sark ought to be ashamed of himself for putting that kind of offensive product out on the field for the fans. This team is going to lose a lot of games. That was bad. No other way to spin it guys.

If only there was some site that could have warned them.
 
The entire offense looks gimmicky as if Sark is betting that simply running plays fast-and they weren't running plays that fast, will make up for a lack of imagination and poor execution on offense.
Click to expand...

they don't call him the best playcaller in the nation for nothing
 
There's a reason why SC is always good - they expect greatness and know what it looks like.

Sark hasn't coached a game yet and they know he's not the guy.

The under on 3.5 years for Sark is looking like a strong favorite right now.
 
Found another poast on wearesc.com. This one is from username "KimG"

Boy, lot of negativity in here. I thought the spring game looked good. The playcalling is designed to make up for any shortcomings in the O-Line. OL is overrated-- that's the genius of bubble screens. Sark did that at Washington, and just look at how badly he beat Oregon State. Anyone who says otherwise is twisting my words. Don't be a twister. I'm hearing from sources that Sark is going to own the Pac-12 south. Just what I'm hearing. Stay tuned.

I don't know who the hell wrote that nonsense, but it looks like SWS has at least one fan.
 
Don'tBeaTwisterDawg is still available at Hartdcore Husky
Click to expand...

Sounds like the next user name for QuornDawg when one of his handles gets banned.
 
the other beauty of Sark's offense is going to be the number of 3 and outs his speedy paced shitstorm results in and then, the lack of depth will catch up with the defense and they'll get tired early on and then post-game kick ass pressers will sound like this.

"We just needed to make a few plays on offense and it's a different game... we don't have depth right now due to sanctions..." (queue the woe is me sound bite from pre-spring).
 
The entire offense looks gimmicky as if Sark is betting that simply running plays fast-and they weren't running plays that fast, will make up for a lack of imagination and poor execution on offense.
Click to expand...

they don't call him the best playcaller in the nation for nothing
Click to expand...

This is a perfect description of our offense last year. Sark thought, "hey, Chip Kelly was succesful by running plays quickly and catching the other team off guard. That's what I'll do."

What he didn't realize was that running plays quickly was only a small part of why Chip's offense worked. Blocking schemes and receiver routes were a much more important part of Oregon's offense. I remember watching Oregon a couple years ago and on a botched qb rollout the RB came back into the play and blocked a linebacker and the center (Grassu) ran 20 yards down field to block a safety allowing Mariota to get score once he got loose. This has to be taught and practiced through discipline. Sark saw this and said "duh, they fast and they win. I run fast plays too. I win".

The problem is, as USC will soon find out, is that if you run 3 quick shitty plays with undisciplined players who don't know their assignments, you get a 45 second possession with a 3 and out. A bubble-screen to a covered receiver without blockers is only going to net you 2 yards 95% of the time. It doesn't matter how quickly you run it. Then your defense is on the field for way too long, you fall behind, and then your play book gets that much smaller.

Sark's offense is "same shitty plays, but way faster"
 
I know Kim used this word to describe Mora which couldn't be further from the truth but Sark is going to implode down in USC.

They won't put up with his bullshit down there. I was actually surprised Sark left to USC myself. Once he fails at USC I doubt he ever has another head coaching gig again.
 
I know Kim used this word to describe Mora which couldn't be further from the truth but Sark is going to implode down in USC.

They won't put up with his bullshit down there. I was actually surprised Sark left to USC myself. Once he fails at USC I doubt he ever has another head coaching gig again.
Click to expand...

Sark has one of the best agents in the business. I have no idea who in the hell he is but he helped get him the job at SC and had his name in NFL coaching searches and even Arkansas at one point (No way Sark takes a job where they fire you for lying about your affairs with co-eds).

After SC he will land a coordinator job or lower level D1 school.
 
Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.

He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.

He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst.
 
Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.

He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.

He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst.
Click to expand...
I don't see Sark as someone who's good with money.
 
Sark doesn't need another head coaching gig. He's fucking set. At UW he probably made ~$10M and if he's at USC for 3 years he'll make $13-14M. As long as he saves he good amount of that he's got close to $10M in the bank. Plus a bit more after he gets fired.

He's a smart guy and an opportunist. He knew UW could get back to bowls immediately and could milk the 0-12 to inflate his performance and get him a second gig. Had he stayed around UW the story on his tenure would have been more about how he failed to compete for championships. He left when he could claim victory on the turnaround in the program.

He probably thinks that he can do what he did at UW, add in top 5 classes at USC and he'll have top 10 teams at worst.
Click to expand...
I don't see Sark as someone who's good with money.
Click to expand...

True...hes probably the type of guy who thinks he'll be making his current salary for a long time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top