Found this on wearesc.com
- Thread starter HuskyJW
- Start date
allpurpleallgold
New Fish
It was a very small moment but I thought Justin Wilcox yelling "9 wins" on his way out the door was very telling. These guys actually think they did a great job at Washington. From 0-12 to 9 wins brah. Sark and his boys actually believe the bullshit they're selling. In that context it's not at all surprising that Sark took the job.
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
Damn I expect that nonsense from Sark but I figured Wilcox was above that garbage. I gotta say I was disappointed in Wilcox choosing to go with Sark.
You are right that Sark thinks his tenure at Washington was a success. He's had so many up here in the media who have blown him the last few years telling him how great he is that I think he actually believes he inherited a true 0-12 program.
Kiffin's agent killed it too. My theory is they got into the right LA social circles because of their affiliations to USC's dominance. There were tons of celebrities around and no NFL team. The Hollywood types saw dollar signs and they have all laughed all the way to the bank despite Sark and Kiffin being bad coaches. The wonderboy reputations and great agents have been a lethal combination.
I wouldn't be one bit surprised if Sark gets another BCS job after he gets fired at USC. Some shitty program will pay him 2+ million because he has "proven" he can turn a program around. After all, UW was 0-12 when he was hired!
Last edited:
sarktastic
New Fish
I read somewhere Sarks daddy was some so cal real estate developer and he and his buddies were long term USC big time boosters for years.
priapism
Active poster
Some of you are forgetting:
2013 Washington offense:
Total Offense: 499.3 yds/game, 13th nationally (SC: 399.9 yds/game, 72nd nationally)
Rushing Offense: 239.0 yds/game, 15th nationally (SC: 172.8 yds/game 59th nationally)
Scoring Offense: 37.9 pts/game, 18th nationally (SC: 29.7 pts/game, 60th nationally)
Third Down Conv. %: 49.0% overall, 11th nationally (SC: 35.1% overall, 97th nationally)
Red Zone Score TD%: 85.2% overall (SC: 73.0% overall)
The numbers don't lie.
Sark has as good or better players at SC at every position other than TE and QB. Even if SC doesn't live up to these numbers, the offense will be much better than last season. Sark has the benefit of the experience of implementing this system last year at UW in order to adjust accordingly at SC. I saw UW's spring game last year and it wasn't much better than SC's yesterday.
Let's see what happens in fall camp. If we still see some of these issues at that time, then there's reason for concern.
Sark is a good coach and knows what he's doing. With all the great offenses around the country in today's game, you can't achieve the numbers listed above by accident.
Sark's success at $C over the next 3 years will invalidate the beliefs here that he was a bad coach...
2013 Washington offense:
Total Offense: 499.3 yds/game, 13th nationally (SC: 399.9 yds/game, 72nd nationally)
Rushing Offense: 239.0 yds/game, 15th nationally (SC: 172.8 yds/game 59th nationally)
Scoring Offense: 37.9 pts/game, 18th nationally (SC: 29.7 pts/game, 60th nationally)
Third Down Conv. %: 49.0% overall, 11th nationally (SC: 35.1% overall, 97th nationally)
Red Zone Score TD%: 85.2% overall (SC: 73.0% overall)
The numbers don't lie.
Sark has as good or better players at SC at every position other than TE and QB. Even if SC doesn't live up to these numbers, the offense will be much better than last season. Sark has the benefit of the experience of implementing this system last year at UW in order to adjust accordingly at SC. I saw UW's spring game last year and it wasn't much better than SC's yesterday.
Let's see what happens in fall camp. If we still see some of these issues at that time, then there's reason for concern.
Sark is a good coach and knows what he's doing. With all the great offenses around the country in today's game, you can't achieve the numbers listed above by accident.
Sark's success at $C over the next 3 years will invalidate the beliefs here that he was a bad coach...
I don't know if this post is a whoosh or not, but the bold isn't true. UW had better WR's and a better RB too. USC also lost 4 OL from last year's team. They already have a true freshman starting at guard. It's not that talented of an offense. UW's offense was good last year, but froze up and under achieved against the good teams. The offense was very average and even sucked in the 4 years before that. He's not a good OC, let alone a good head coach.
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
Can you quote this "Great" coach and his offensive numbers from 2009, 2010, and 2012? Sark had two good years of offense, one average(2009) and two shit years(2010 and 2012).
Sark was all over the place offensively and against the good teams his teams didn't do jack shit.
HeretoBeatmyChest
New Fish
That post was a woosh. It came from some USC dbag in that thread who was trying to reassure the other posters there.
topdawgnc
New Fish
I'm going to take some heat for saying this, but Sark is not a bad coach.
He is lazy, immature, and overrated as a play caller.
What we overlook is at the age of 34 he took over one of the top football programs in the country (revenue, size, conference, etc) and didn't run it into the ground.
0-12 was not 0-12 ... it was still a bad culture and could have easily been in the shits for years.
If the guy had discipline, maybe paid his dues a little more and been focused, he likely would have been above average.
At SC I fully expect him to win 9-10-11 games a year. The equivalent to average at Washington. Just enough to make the naive believe in him ... piss off those who know better ... and not justify a buy out by firing.
He will never out coach a good coach, he'll never out hustle a worker coach, and he'll beat average coaches and beat the shit out of bad coaches.
As the famous Race Bannon says ... you are what your record says you are ... and it fully applies to Sark.
A below average coach who feasts on weak competition and has a great agent and a charming smile.
He is lazy, immature, and overrated as a play caller.
What we overlook is at the age of 34 he took over one of the top football programs in the country (revenue, size, conference, etc) and didn't run it into the ground.
0-12 was not 0-12 ... it was still a bad culture and could have easily been in the shits for years.
If the guy had discipline, maybe paid his dues a little more and been focused, he likely would have been above average.
At SC I fully expect him to win 9-10-11 games a year. The equivalent to average at Washington. Just enough to make the naive believe in him ... piss off those who know better ... and not justify a buy out by firing.
He will never out coach a good coach, he'll never out hustle a worker coach, and he'll beat average coaches and beat the shit out of bad coaches.
As the famous Race Bannon says ... you are what your record says you are ... and it fully applies to Sark.
A below average coach who feasts on weak competition and has a great agent and a charming smile.
Ron_Fairly
New Fish
Nah. Already have my next one picked out
CuntWaffle
New Fish
"2013 Washington offense:
Total Offense: 499.3 yds/game, 13th nationally (SC: 399.9 yds/game, 72nd nationally)
Rushing Offense: 239.0 yds/game, 15th nationally (SC: 172.8 yds/game 59th nationally)
Scoring Offense: 37.9 pts/game, 18th nationally (SC: 29.7 pts/game, 60th nationally)
Third Down Conv. %: 49.0% overall, 11th nationally (SC: 35.1% overall, 97th nationally)
Red Zone Score TD%: 85.2% overall (SC: 73.0% overall)
The numbers don't lie. "
CHRIST!
Have fun driving down 60 yards only to end up taking a field goal. Or even better missing the 30 yard field goal because SarkFS only recruits WR/RB/QBs. Those numbers are so inflated it isn't even funny.
If this genius went and actually looked at the schedule from last year he would realize Sark inflates his offensive stats by plungering D1-AA teams and shitty Pac-12 ones like Oregon State.
I can't wait until USC is getting plungered by UCLA despite having 400 yards of offense in the 4th quarter and this Mannyb133 fuck comes to the realization those numbers were indeed lying.
Total Offense: 499.3 yds/game, 13th nationally (SC: 399.9 yds/game, 72nd nationally)
Rushing Offense: 239.0 yds/game, 15th nationally (SC: 172.8 yds/game 59th nationally)
Scoring Offense: 37.9 pts/game, 18th nationally (SC: 29.7 pts/game, 60th nationally)
Third Down Conv. %: 49.0% overall, 11th nationally (SC: 35.1% overall, 97th nationally)
Red Zone Score TD%: 85.2% overall (SC: 73.0% overall)
The numbers don't lie. "
CHRIST!
Have fun driving down 60 yards only to end up taking a field goal. Or even better missing the 30 yard field goal because SarkFS only recruits WR/RB/QBs. Those numbers are so inflated it isn't even funny.
If this genius went and actually looked at the schedule from last year he would realize Sark inflates his offensive stats by plungering D1-AA teams and shitty Pac-12 ones like Oregon State.
I can't wait until USC is getting plungered by UCLA despite having 400 yards of offense in the 4th quarter and this Mannyb133 fuck comes to the realization those numbers were indeed lying.
