Former poster Coker is bullish on the Dawgs

I watched the video, and a video of Sydney Sweeney in a bra auto played after it. TYFYS.
Spokane's finest.
John Stockton would like a word.
Say that word to her titties!

img-1727.gif
She can't run the pick and roll worth shit.
Johnny Short Shorts forevah!
 
Remember when Coker had a mental breakdown on X and started screaming that every husky fan that didn't get the jab was to blame for UW only playing 4 games in 2020?
That was fun.
 
Remember when Coker had a mental breakdown on X and started screaming that every husky fan that didn't get the jab was to blame for UW only playing 4 games in 2020?
That was fun.
He has a sensitive side.
 
Remember when Coker had a mental breakdown on X and started screaming that every husky fan that didn't get the jab was to blame for UW only playing 4 games in 2020?
That was fun.
I thought it was because Puka was MAGA and gave the whole team covid.
 
Remember when Coker had a mental breakdown on X and started screaming that every husky fan that didn't get the jab was to blame for UW only playing 4 games in 2020?
That was fun.
I thought it was because Puka was MAGA and gave the whole team covid.
I thought it was because Ryan Bowman decided hang out with his brother a few weeks before the Stanford game.
 
The WR issue/question to me is going to be vastly overblown
Demond isn't necessarily your typical QB as so much will come off of the threat of the run game
Boston is clearly a WR1 and has a very good chance to be a Day 1 NFL pick … at worst he'll be a Day 2 guy
The #2 receiving option on this team will be DeGraaf … there's a lot of opportunity for him to be involved in play action off of the run game
The TE that we brought in from USC is more than useful and to me is very indicative of the fact that we're going to run a lot of 2 TE sets with him as the primary blocking TE and thus freeing up DeGraaf as the receiving option
The WR from Penn St had a huge YPC and that also fits in what is going to be in play with Demond as shots should be in the cards as safeties cheat up … he's going to be the HR threat whereas Boston will be more of the possession and go to option.
The recruiting class also has a lot of youth coming in that is very talented … I'll be incredibly interested in seeing what they bring to the table this year. WR is a position where talented freshmen can come in and contribute fairly easily.
I'll need to go back and watch the game with Louisville again as that's probably the cleanest look as to what the offense will look like with Demond (Oregon was a different beast) …
Assuming the OL can get to league average (at minimum) then I'm not concerned about the offense at all
 
Remember when Coker had a mental breakdown on X and started screaming that every husky fan that didn't get the jab was to blame for UW only playing 4 games in 2020?
That was fun.
That was when he blocked me. He’s such a sensitive librul twat.
 
Who the hell is Lawman on the Seattle Times? He has a real axe to grind with anything UW sports, I assume he’s a duck or coug.
 
This take isn’t going to go over well with the large contingent here that wants to crucify Jed after 15 months. Hi Race
Until Fisch proves it Race and J are actually right.
I just think Fisch probably does prove it and make the playoffs by year 3. If he doesn't oh well I was wrong. It happens to everyone, even me (though it's pretty rare).
Also, Coker is a racist fucking moron.
 
Remember when Coker had a mental breakdown on X and started screaming that every husky fan that didn't get the jab was to blame for UW only playing 4 games in 2020?
That was fun.
That was when he blocked me. He’s such a sensitive librul twat.
Ain’t nothing wrong with being a liberal, if you’re tough and not sensitive.
Fair poont. Coker ain’t one of those, unfortunately.
Nope.
 
Who the hell is Lawman on the Seattle Times? He has a real axe to grind with anything UW sports, I assume he’s a duck or coug.
that’s the ST’s way of still holding a grudge v. UW 35 years after the fact…. Bobby C was an outlier… Fuck em
Actually this is good timing because I listened to The Bill Simmons podcast about the movie Blue Chips and they were like there's the beat reporter for the local team who is gung ho about destroying the program he is covering for his newspaper that's not realistic and I laughed my ass off. You've never heard of the Seattle Times. Was also annoying as shit because in the movie the team's season ends in the regular season they went on for a while about how that wasn't realistic why wasn't there a conference tournament? The team is clearly UCLA in the movie and the Pac-12 didn't have a conference tournament until the mid-2000s.
 
Back
Top