DuckFighter Illustrated: College Football is Back!

administrator

Administrator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam

dfi-aug.png
DuckFighter Illustrated: College Football is Back!
The satirical DuckFighter Illustrated returns! With its searing insight, inside jokes and bad puns, it makes for entertaining reading. When it comes to the grizzled scribe known as Race Bannon, no cow is too sacred to be skewered. Most definitely to be read tongue-in-cheek.
Read the full story here

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wasn't it Phil Bleenor who told us that he really only considers this Sarks second year?

I think it was. Phil Bleenor doesn't count the years that Holt was the DC. That means the two wins vs. USC and the Holiday Bowl win vs. Nebraska don't count as well.

Good for Phil Bleenor. He's a fucking asshole.
 
Not your best effort (but I still liked it).

It would be good to assign a research team at DFI to determine how many years running "young team" appeared in mostly legit news reporting (eg., Seattle Times). I remember back in the 2000 season Ted whats-his-face was saying the team lacked experience here and there, which counts as "young." It's been every year since then, I think. Last year the team was sure young.
 
I will actually start looking forward to Monday.....No mention of the Starbucks east end zone. Starbucks stadium will offer advertising never in seen in a college football arena.
 
this is gay:

(Editor's note: For those uninitiated to the writings of Race Bannon, his articles are satirical in nature and are to be taken tongue-in-cheek).

Lil Kim did mention hearing that on Capitol Hill, this is a universal last call pick up signal.
 
It is a good thing I remembered your expectations line from your podcast.

Continue to set the bar low and you to can win a gold medal.
 
this is gay:

(Editor's note: For those uninitiated to the writings of Race Bannon, his articles are satirical in nature and are to be taken tongue-in-cheek).

Race never claimed to be a journalist.

i'd like to think that people reading DFI would understand that it's satire and would not need the disclaimer. or am I getting whooshed and that's part of the schtick?
 
this is gay:

(Editor's note: For those uninitiated to the writings of Race Bannon, his articles are satirical in nature and are to be taken tongue-in-cheek).

Race never claimed to be a journalist.

i'd like to think that people reading DFI would understand that it's satire and would not need the disclaimer. or am I getting whooshed and that's part of the schtick?

Its for Section38
 
this is gay:

(Editor's note: For those uninitiated to the writings of Race Bannon, his articles are satirical in nature and are to be taken tongue-in-cheek).

Race never claimed to be a journalist.

i'd like to think that people reading DFI would understand that it's satire and would not need the disclaimer. or am I getting whooshed and that's part of the schtick?

Its for Section38

he has anal warts. (allegedly)
 
this is gay:

(Editor's note: For those uninitiated to the writings of Race Bannon, his articles are satirical in nature and are to be taken tongue-in-cheek).

Race never claimed to be a journalist.

i'd like to think that people reading DFI would understand that it's satire and would not need the disclaimer. or am I getting whooshed and that's part of the schtick?

Its for Section38FuckingStupid

 
Back
Top