D
[Deleted User]
Guest
"Washington is a football school"
"Washington used to be a football school"
FO, G
"Washington is a football school"
"Washington used to be a football school"
"Would you fire coach X cause him and Sark has similar records at this point?"
Example: After 2 years, doogs brought up how James was only 11-11 while Sark was 12-13. After 3 years, doogs then compared Sark to Harbaugh who was only 17-20. After 4 years now I'm hearing Sark is just like Saban at Michigan State.
Every example changes because that coach had a top 10 finish the following year something Sark is incapable of.
I'm just happy we are in five star player X top 5.
Sark runs a "pro style" offense ! The fucking idiot. If he truly did he'd be challenging for the pac12 title this year .
OK class, how do we shut down spread offenses? We pound the football like Stanford, keep DAT off the field, kill the clock, play killer defense (which we will ), make field goals and punt well.
Sark ditched the run game ((Sankey did most on his own and in a sort of play-action mode) Sark hasn't lined it up and ran the football since his 1st year. David Shaw lines it up and beats you, Sark puts KP in the gun and uses Sankey for the sneaky little bursts of yardage (big dif )
Myth 2? Sark is an offensive genious. The dude is a paranoid and undisciplined playcaller. Worst I've ever seen, solely because he's the head coach. If he'd ditch playcalling he'd succeed here. He wont so he wont.
"Sark is a victim of his own success" but to b fair, I've only heard this from softy
"Sark is a victim of his own success" but to b fair, I've only heard this from softy
That one is normally reserved for Romar.