DucksFC
Active poster
It's not about policy. Michelle Obama could go up in front of everyone, say "I'm running for President" and probably get half the vote. She doesn't need to do shit because that's not what this election is about. I'm just pointing out what the Dems likely wanted. I think it's obviously they didn't want Kamala unless they had to.Just for shits and giggles, list the policy differences between Mrs. Worf and Kameltoe? Hell, even barry. Still getting no policy recommendations from the NeverTrumpers. Just BS about character.It's a not Trump vote for a lot people, sure. Kamala is the last ditch high profile option. The Dems want Michelle Obama, who I think both sides can agree would be a tougher challenge to Trump based on name and reputation alone. But she has no interest. Everyone else is four years away at least. I like Shapiro, personally, but right now nobody knows who he is.
Kamala isn't the first choice or even the 10th for a lot of voters on the left. I knew she was a waste of time back when everyone thought she'd destroy Pence in the debates, but then she wasn't even close. And Pence is the most boring man to walk the face of planet Earth. You have to suck to not be able to out-debate him. I expect her to giggle and say "I'm talking" to Trump about 10 times as well minimum during the debate, and nothing of value will be said or accomplished. Can't imagine if she had debated Vance. She would've made that dopey bitch (even this MAGA circlejerk board knows he is, don't deny it) look competent.
There really is no one else. So it's Trump vs not Trump. Same as it ever was. Take your pick.
Last edited: