An Analytical Approach to the Best and Worst Poasters

We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.

What are the ANALytics behind the point system?

View attachment 17024

The point system is inherently biased towards long term poasters regardless of quality. It's basically a counting metric. My rankings measure quality on a per-post basis.

Total yards vs. YPC

Also, fuck off! You sound like you care.
 
We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.

What are the ANALytics behind the point system?

View attachment 17024

The point system is inherently biased towards long term poasters regardless of quality. It's basically a counting metric. My rankings measure quality on a per-post basis.

Total yards vs. YPC

Also, fuck off! You sound like you care.

Well FUCK YOU too then bastard!
 
We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.

What are the ANALytics behind the point system?

View attachment 17024

The point system is inherently biased towards long term poasters regardless of quality. It's basically a counting metric. My rankings measure quality on a per-post basis.

Total yards vs. YPC

Also, fuck off! You sound like you care.

Thanks for the explanation, even though it lacked detail.

I THINK and I CARE! Hoping to be the #1 ranked Beaver poaster.
 
Fuck these volume shooters.[/b] I'm just hoping to get a hat on the table with this 30-1 up/Chin to down/wtf ratio.
Omjv.gif

 
Fuck these volume shooters. I'm just hoping to get a hat on the table with this 30-1 up/Chin to down/wtf ratio.

My dear fren @oregonblitzkrieg would have been more than happy to even those out for you. @DerekJohnson would have you know that wtf's are not inherently bad as they indicate your content stirs emotion and generates reaction.
 
Fuck these volume shooters. I'm just hoping to get a hat on the table with this 30-1 up/Chin to down/wtf ratio.

My dear fren @oregonblitzkrieg would have been more than happy to even those out for you. @DerekJohnson would have you know that wtf's are not inherently bad as they indicate your content stirs emotion and generates reaction.

And he'd be wrong. My schtick is to have the most crowd pleasing, lukewarm takes just to inflate that number.
 
Last edited:
I'd just like to say that while my numbers are certainly underwhelming, I did it the old fashioned way, with shitty jokes and tit pictures. The mans way. Not like @GrundleStiltzkin and @DoogCourics and @HillsboroDuck and their newfangled twatter links that are guaranteed to deliver 15 chins a pop. Fuck those guys.

#oldskool#titsorgtfo
 
I'd just like to say that while my numbers are certainly underwhelming, I did it the old fashioned way, with shitty jokes and tit pictures. The mans way. Not like @GrundleStiltzkin and @DoogCourics and @HillsboroDuck and their newfangled twatter links that are guaranteed to deliver 15 chins a pop. Fuck those guys.

#oldskool#titsorgtfo

Bows and arrows are no match for the white devils technology man. Gotta get with the times.

#injunjokesforcheapchins
 
I'd just like to say that while my numbers are certainly underwhelming, I did it the old fashioned way, with shitty jokes and tit pictures. The mans way. Not like @GrundleStiltzkin and @DoogCourics and @HillsboroDuck and their newfangled twatter links that are guaranteed to deliver 15 chins a pop. Fuck those guys.

#oldskool#titsorgtfo

Bows and arrows are no match for the white devils technology man. Gotta get with the times.

#injunjokesforcheapchins

tenor.gif

 
Spooge ruined my ratio forever with his WTF rampage. Also defending Rapp the past few days was bad for my brand.
 
Having gratuitous WTFs is a badge of honor

If I’m hitting a semi controversial topic and the post is received 50/50 good/bad that’s great balance

Except that I had a category for this. "Controversial" being highest in combined Rec's and Anti Rec's per poast. Pumpy best at this followed closely by Ballz.

Pumpy good at everything.
 
Back
Top