jhfstyle24
New Fish
We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.
What are the ANALytics behind the point system?
View attachment 17024
Race has done it again!
We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.
What are the ANALytics behind the point system?
View attachment 17024
We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.
What are the ANALytics behind the point system?
View attachment 17024
We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.
What are the ANALytics behind the point system?
View attachment 17024
We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.
What are the ANALytics behind the point system?
View attachment 17024
The point system is inherently biased towards long term poasters regardless of quality. It's basically a counting metric. My rankings measure quality on a per-post basis.
Total yards vs. YPC
Also, fuck off! You sound like you care.
We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.
What are the ANALytics behind the point system?
View attachment 17024
The point system is inherently biased towards long term poasters regardless of quality. It's basically a counting metric. My rankings measure quality on a per-post basis.
Total yards vs. YPC
Also, fuck off! You sound like you care.
We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.
What are the ANALytics behind the point system?
View attachment 17024
We? already have a built in shitty ranking of poasters courtesy of @Vanilla.
What are the ANALytics behind the point system?
View attachment 17024
Fuck these volume shooters.[/b] I'm just hoping to get a hat on the table with this 30-1 up/Chin to down/wtf ratio.
Fuck these volume shooters. I'm just hoping to get a hat on the table with this 30-1 up/Chin to down/wtf ratio.
Fuck these volume shooters. I'm just hoping to get a hat on the table with this 30-1 up/Chin to down/wtf ratio.
My dear fren @oregonblitzkrieg would have been more than happy to even those out for you. @DerekJohnson would have you know that wtf's are not inherently bad as they indicate your content stirs emotion and generates reaction.
I'd just like to say that while my numbers are certainly underwhelming, I did it the old fashioned way, with shitty jokes and tit pictures. The mans way. Not like @GrundleStiltzkin and @DoogCourics and @HillsboroDuck and their newfangled twatter links that are guaranteed to deliver 15 chins a pop. Fuck those guys.
#oldskool#titsorgtfo
I'd just like to say that while my numbers are certainly underwhelming, I did it the old fashioned way, with shitty jokes and tit pictures. The mans way. Not like @GrundleStiltzkin and @DoogCourics and @HillsboroDuck and their newfangled twatter links that are guaranteed to deliver 15 chins a pop. Fuck those guys.
#oldskool#titsorgtfo
Bows and arrows are no match for the white devils technology man. Gotta get with the times.
#injunjokesforcheapchins
Having gratuitous WTFs is a badge of honor
If I’m hitting a semi controversial topic and the post is received 50/50 good/bad that’s great balance
Except that I had a category for this. "Controversial" being highest in combined Rec's and Anti Rec's per poast. Pumpy best at this followed closely by Ballz.
I Don't trust a ranking system with no input from Eklund or Fetters. They both ranked me as a 5* poaster.