30 for 30 SC

C

creepycoug

Well-known poster
So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:

1. UCLA; and
2. Notre Dame

No Washington?

Where's the respect?

Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.

Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.

There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.
 
Last edited:
washington has some great cameos in the 30 for 30s. Both 'U' episodes, Todd marinovich, I think they had something at the end of Trojan War for the 2009 USC upset being the end of the Carroll era.
 
I couldn't give a flying fuck about SC, i just want the Dawgs to be good. I don't understand y the half of HH is obsessed with SC.
 
I couldn't give a flying fuck about SC, i just want the Dawgs to be good. I don't understand y the half of HH is obsessed with SC.
Click to expand...

Half is being generous; legions of UW fans identify with being SC's favorite runner up.
 
I mean we've been irrelevant for over 15 years, its been awhile since we were more than an annoyance to them. Even now in making the playoff before them they still beat us. It will take a few years of meeting them in the P12 championship to really get the rivalry going again, especially with the fact that we don't even play them every year
 
Do people really think sc cares about Washington ?

I thought that was just a joke on this site.
Click to expand...

Yes. It comes up in the always thought-provoking "history" convos.

ND and UCLA. That's who they care about.
 
SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.

SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period.

USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.
 
SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.

SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period.

USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.
Click to expand...

Quit plagiarism my shit fucko!!

Btw, that wasn't the point of my poast. You need to get in touch with @reedstrong. He can help you.
 
So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:

1. UCLA; and
2. Notre Dame

No Washington?

Where's the respect?

Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.

Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.

There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.
Click to expand...

Hi. Between 2001 and 2009 - the Carroll era- when did UW matter?

this year they aren't scheduled. SC plays YOUR Kewgs @7:30 on a Friday night. SC on a Friday night means your team sucks. Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Pete won one BCS title.

Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
 
Last edited:
Pete won one BCS title.

Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
Click to expand...

The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).

@Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored.
 
Pete won one BCS title.

Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
Click to expand...

Pete won one BCS title.

Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
Click to expand...

The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).

@Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored.
Click to expand...

Am I wrong? A dynasty isn't dominating a shitty conference, USC does that in their sleep.

Pete won one BCS Championship. Gene Chizick has the same. Pete demolished the Pac-10 when it wad fucking awful and beat up on the B1G Ten. He wasn't Miami or Nebraska.

Pete is a great coach, but was anyone in the conference even remotely decent during his time? Cal had one decent year. Oregon had one decent year.

When Bellotti hired Chip in 2007 Pete was fucking over. By the time he left he was the head of an 8 win program. Chip would have throat fucked him worse than Harbaugh already was if he stuck around.

Mike fucking Riley.
 
Last edited:
So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:

1. UCLA; and
2. Notre Dame

No Washington?

Where's the respect?

Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.

Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.

There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.
Click to expand...

Hi. Between 2001 and 2009 - the Carroll era- when did UW matter?

this year they aren't scheduled. SC plays YOUR Kewgs @7:30 on a Friday night. SC on a Friday night means your team sucks. Hope this helps.
Click to expand...

You, too, must get in touch with @reedstrong; he'll explain.

Thanks for the scheduling heads up.

 
Guysm guysm guysm, the OP wasn't focused on the most recent SC run. That's the topic of the 30/30 but the comment made therein about ND and UCLA, as well as UW's team crush on the Trojans, is an all time thing.

Cheese and Rice ... You all need some @reedstrong time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top