Last edited:
Zuby: THIS Is Why Our Society Is Falling Apart
- Thread starter DerekJohnson
- Start date
TurdBomber
Active poster
More Zuby. Less Lemon.
Amala is the shit too.
Deeper than his point is that social media facilitates people seeking out groups who all think alike and attempt to destroy those who don't agree. I've been saying for close to 10 years now that social media is what is destroying the country. Not really a hot take, but they need to be dismantled.
Social media reveals who we are it doesn't shape who we are
Like internet football fans - fans have always wanted to fire the coach after every loss they just didn't have anywhere to say it. Now they do
Like internet football fans - fans have always wanted to fire the coach after every loss they just didn't have anywhere to say it. Now they do
TurdBomber
Active poster
There's always been the Nation on one side and the WSJ on the other. This isn't such a new phenomenon.
Being online multiple hours of the day, and constantly connected via news notifications on your iPhone - That's the problem.
Nobody has time to think or reflect. So they just spew.
Anonymity of the internet enables a lot of it, for sure. I get that there's always been a Hatfield and McCoys thing in the US. Social media platforms almost solely exist to exploit that phenomenon. Being able to remain anonymous while also spewing hate/misinformation and have it seen instantly by thousands or millions of people all at once. Gee, what could go wrong? I don't know how anyone could argue that disbanding social media would be bad for the US.
Pics?
People tend to think of Cronkite as a centrist and news as being straight back in the day but he wasn't and it wasn't. Nowhere near to what it is today but it was a monopoly and that isn't good
The WaPO and NY Times and the three networks covered the same stories each day and what they didn't cover was as important as what they did
Rush Limbaugh earned the absolute hatred he received by ending the monopoly and exposing the managed consent. Managed consent had been a thing in the 60's but as we would find out the 60's "radicals" didn't really want to fight the power they wanted to control it
And they would without the internet. They already try to rewrite or ignore history that shows them to be hypocrites or worse. You have AXIO scrubbing old issues off the net.
Last edited:
TheKobeStopper
New Fish
Most people would prefer to feel like their opinions make them better than others. Hence, “everyone else is a coward but I’m the one with the truth!”
Now, there is a classic weak lame ass moral equivalency argument. There is no "truth" on the left. Just lies and the seeking of power. You are a coward and you avoid the truth like a slug avoids salt.
When a black says he doesn't want his kids taught to hate white people and that people should be judged on the content of their character and not their skin color then they are not authentically black as defined by leftards like the slobberer.
TheKobeStopper
New Fish
This is the part where they bring up race because they lost the argument.
hardhat
New Fish
I asked a clarifying question. I'm sure you don't get triggered by someone like Jordan Peterson because they refused to be bullied by trans activists, or a guy like Zuby because he's speaking his mind but not spouting out ibrahim kendi quotes. Just seems weird that it bothers you so much, and is it a coincidence that he's black?
TheKobeStopper
New Fish
Where’s the question mark?
This is where the slobberer avoids the topic and then "wins" the argument. His opinion is truthful that CRT should be taught in school and that whitey is the devil. No facts are necessary just a wad of feelings.