Your final grade for Sark?

A+

Sark is the greatest coach to ever grace the sidelines of Husky Stadium. It's a shame that an unproven coach will now be given credit for the foundation he set and the personal sacrifice he made for UW.

As Sark returns USC to Carroll'esque glory, HHB's will regret the day they drove him away. The crime in all this is that they will never be held accountable for the permanent damage they've caused the program as they hid behind their anonymity.
 
A+

Best play caller in America

Great recruiter, everybody says so

Kick ass pressers and memorials

Master motivator

Hip style

Big time on social media

 
I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.

If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.

He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.

Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F.
 
A+

Sark is the greatest coach to ever grace the sidelines of Husky Stadium. It's a shame that an unproven coach will now be given credit for the foundation he set and the personal sacrifice he made for UW.

As Sark returns USC to Carroll'esque glory, HHB's will regret the day they drove him away. The crime in all this is that they will never be held accountable for the permanent damage they've caused the program as they hid behind their anonymity.
Click to expand...

pressing
 
I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.

If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.

He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.

Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F.
Click to expand...

How is Willingham anything but an F?
 
I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.

If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.

He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.

Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F.
Click to expand...

How is Willingham anything but an F?
Click to expand...

this. Willingham gets a fucking Z
 
I place 2008 squarely on Mark Emmert. How fucking hard would you work if you were fired, but then reinstated later.

Gilby was worse than Tyrone, an utter fucking failure on all levels. Giving Tyrone an F and Sark a C is too much distance between the two. Exclude 2008 and there wasn't a huge difference between Ty and Sark.
 
I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.

If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.

He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.

Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F.
Click to expand...

Oh god here comes the Wilcox love fest again. Improved us from 5-4 to 5-4.
 
I place 2008 squarely on Mark Emmert. How fucking hard would you work if you were fired, but then reinstated later.

Gilby was worse than Tyrone, an utter fucking failure on all levels. Giving Tyrone an F and Sark a C is too much distance between the two. Exclude 2008 and there wasn't a huge difference between Ty and Sark.
Click to expand...

That's why you give Ty an F and Sark a D.

HTH.
 
The fuck? Grades are allowed in Seattle?
Click to expand...

My high school changed f's to "e's." This was a mainstream school too, not some hippie alternative school.

600 foot tsunami. 9.7 earthquake. massive fire. NOW

 
C- And he was not a B recruiter. A B recruiter would have gotten at least one OL guy from the famous bumper crop. He was a C. He inherited a even win talent and won 7 games on average. A C is average. I give him a minus for talking and not ever backing it up.
 
Last edited:
I think you can give the Sark regime a C+ but Sark a C-.

If Woodward does not pay up for Wilcox, Tosh, etc...Sark goes 4-8 in 2012 and probably 7-6 in 2013. I give Sark little credit for the 9-4 and top 15 metrics 2013 team. He deserves a little credit for changing the offense but thats it.

He basically inherited a 5 win team and could not exceed 7 wins. A competent coach (not a Petersen type) would have taken UW to 9-10 wins.

Willingham gets a D and Gilby an F.
Click to expand...

Oh god here comes the Wilcox love fest again. Improved us from 5-4 to 5-4.
Click to expand...
I can sort of understand wilcox but tosh? what the fuck did tosh ever do for this program that effected them in 2012. Never have I seen an assistant coach get more credit for accomplishing so little
 
Last edited:
A-. He was the best play caller in the country and made football fun again. He was also very good with the media. I just wish he recruited a couple more lineman and didn't hire Nick Holt.
 
C - for creampuff.

Sark was an OK salesman. Terrible closer. No self-awareness.

I don't have a problem with him banging Joey's waitresses either. I married a Bellevue Joey's girl shortly after he arrived.

I am now banned from anywhere within 100 yards of a Joey's, Twin-Peaks or other quality whoreish establishments. Oh the irony...

 


C - for creampuff.

Sark was an OK salesman. Terrible closer. No self-awareness.

I don't have a problem with him banging Joey's waitresses either. I married a Bellevue Joey's girl shortly after he arrived.

I am now banned from anywhere within 100 yards of a Joey's, Twin-Peaks or other quality whoreish establishments. Oh the irony...
Click to expand...

How does The Sark Cream Pie taste?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top