You had to cheer for Max Headroom's son Bo Nix and still went 9-3 and lost to both your rivals

[haie]

There needs to be a stat on your profile for the broken quadruple shitpoast

Devs?

 

[46XiJCAB]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

Me, “Siri who was the PAC-12 North Division football champ for 2022?”

Siri, “The PAC-12 has no divisions for the 2022 football season. USC and Utah will be playing for the Conference Championship. Utah won the three way tie between themselves, Oregon and Warshington.”

 

[RaceBannon]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

Me, “Siri who was the PAC-12 North Division football champ for 2022?”

Siri, “The PAC-12 has no divisions for the 2022 football season. USC and Utah will be playing for the Conference Championship. Utah won the three way tie between themselves, Oregon and Warshington.”

No one cares what that chi com bitch says

 

[BleachedAnusDawg]

@MikeSeaver is a broken they/them.

 

[WoolleyDoog]

Putting a bow on this thread. Duck fans, has it actually felt good to be a Bo Nix fan? 100% if he had the season he had for you as a Husky I'd doog for him, but holy shit, deep down it would feel so weird.

 

[haie]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

Me, “Siri who was the PAC-12 North Division football champ for 2022?”

Siri, “Washington. They were the only North team that went undefeated against the other North teams and tied for the best conference record in the North division. Washington has now won the North 2 out of the last 3 seasons.”

 

[EwaDawg]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

10 equals 9? Vernon Adams duck math rules

 

[46XiJCAB]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

Me, “Siri who was the PAC-12 North Division football champ for 2022?”

Siri, “Washington. They were the only North team that went undefeated against the other North teams and tied for the best conference record in the North division. Washington has now won the North 2 out of the last 3 seasons.”

Embarrassing. There is no North Division Champ. The PAC-12 said so. Utah v SC CCG. Oregon didn’t make it. Either did your best team since 2016.

Here’s to backing your way into a RB.

 

[haie]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

Me, “Siri who was the PAC-12 North Division football champ for 2022?”

Siri, “Washington. They were the only North team that went undefeated against the other North teams and tied for the best conference record in the North division. Washington has now won the North 2 out of the last 3 seasons.”

Embarrassing. There is no North Division Champ. The PAC-12 said so. Utah v SC CCG. Oregon didn’t make it. Either did your best team since 2016.

Here’s to backing your way into a RB.

I asked Siri. The science is settled.

 

[MikeSeaver]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

 

[haie]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

So making the College Football Playoff which only two Pac teams have done it (one of a top Oregon teams in school history) doesn't count for doing anything. It's not anyone's fault the current college system is this way.

UW and Oregon had the same season to you, UW with more wins and more wins against ranked teams, including one which was #6 in the country on the road, is the same as Oregon's limp dick season with a lone good win over 9 win UCLA. Utah is barely even worth acknowledging. Both at home.

You do you Mike.

Just don't call anyone else a loser fan because you are the epitome of the loser quook serving me beer in Portland.

 

[MikeSeaver]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

So making the College Football Playoff which only two Pac teams have done it (one of a top Oregon teams in school history) doesn't count for doing anything. It's not anyone's fault the current college system is this way.

UW and Oregon had the same season to you, UW with more wins and more wins against ranked teams, including one which was #6 in the country on the road, is the same as Oregon's limp dick season with a lone good win over 9 win UCLA. Utah is barely even worth acknowledging. Both at home.

You do you Mike.

Just don't call anyone else a loser fan because you are the epitome of the loser quook serving me beer in Portland.

It’s god damned astonishing that in the same breath where you try to advocate for a great UW season, you say Utah’s season isn’t worth mentioning.

Once you figure out why you’re saying “Utah isn’t worth mentioning” you’ll figure out why I’m saying it about UW.

 

[46XiJCAB]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

So making the College Football Playoff which only two Pac teams have done it (one of a top Oregon teams in school history) doesn't count for doing anything. It's not anyone's fault the current college system is this way.

UW and Oregon had the same season to you, UW with more wins and more wins against ranked teams, including one which was #6 in the country on the road, is the same as Oregon's limp dick season with a lone good win over 9 win UCLA. Utah is barely even worth acknowledging. Both at home.

You do you Mike.

Just don't call anyone else a loser fan because you are the epitome of the loser quook serving me beer in Portland.

It’s god damned astonishing that in the same breath where you try to advocate for a great UW season, you say Utah’s season isn’t worth mentioning.

Once you figure out why you’re saying “Utah isn’t worth mentioning” you’ll figure out why I’m saying it about UW.

You actually read what this spaz poasts?

 

[RaceBannon]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

So making the College Football Playoff which only two Pac teams have done it (one of a top Oregon teams in school history) doesn't count for doing anything. It's not anyone's fault the current college system is this way.

UW and Oregon had the same season to you, UW with more wins and more wins against ranked teams, including one which was #6 in the country on the road, is the same as Oregon's limp dick season with a lone good win over 9 win UCLA. Utah is barely even worth acknowledging. Both at home.

You do you Mike.

Just don't call anyone else a loser fan because you are the epitome of the loser quook serving me beer in Portland.

It’s god damned astonishing that in the same breath where you try to advocate for a great UW season, you say Utah’s season isn’t worth mentioning.

Once you figure out why you’re saying “Utah isn’t worth mentioning” you’ll figure out why I’m saying it about UW.

I posted elsewhere that the only fan bases happy with the fucked up Pac 12 this year are Utah and Oregon

Considering how I feel about both that could be an insult

USC - UW is the people's choice and how the league actually played out on the field

 

[MikeSeaver]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

So making the College Football Playoff which only two Pac teams have done it (one of a top Oregon teams in school history) doesn't count for doing anything. It's not anyone's fault the current college system is this way.

UW and Oregon had the same season to you, UW with more wins and more wins against ranked teams, including one which was #6 in the country on the road, is the same as Oregon's limp dick season with a lone good win over 9 win UCLA. Utah is barely even worth acknowledging. Both at home.

You do you Mike.

Just don't call anyone else a loser fan because you are the epitome of the loser quook serving me beer in Portland.

It’s god damned astonishing that in the same breath where you try to advocate for a great UW season, you say Utah’s season isn’t worth mentioning.

Once you figure out why you’re saying “Utah isn’t worth mentioning” you’ll figure out why I’m saying it about UW.

I posted elsewhere that the only fan bases happy with the fucked up Pac 12 this year are Utah and Oregon

Considering how I feel about both that could be an insult

USC - UW is the people's choice and how the league actually played out on the field

Not even close to true. You’re only applying your “Beat Oregon, nothing else matters” criteria.

Same league record. You both lost to UCLA. You both beat OSU, You split ASU, you split Oregon, they beat USC.

They had by far the tougher SOS. They are only behind USC, by 1 pt., for avg. margin of victory (8th in the county). UW is 3rd league and 17th country (with a much easier schedule)

Nobody outside of Cambridge, WA gives a single fuck about UW not being in it.

 

[46XiJCAB]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

So making the College Football Playoff which only two Pac teams have done it (one of a top Oregon teams in school history) doesn't count for doing anything. It's not anyone's fault the current college system is this way.

UW and Oregon had the same season to you, UW with more wins and more wins against ranked teams, including one which was #6 in the country on the road, is the same as Oregon's limp dick season with a lone good win over 9 win UCLA. Utah is barely even worth acknowledging. Both at home.

You do you Mike.

Just don't call anyone else a loser fan because you are the epitome of the loser quook serving me beer in Portland.

It’s god damned astonishing that in the same breath where you try to advocate for a great UW season, you say Utah’s season isn’t worth mentioning.

Once you figure out why you’re saying “Utah isn’t worth mentioning” you’ll figure out why I’m saying it about UW.

I posted elsewhere that the only fan bases happy with the fucked up Pac 12 this year are Utah and Oregon

Considering how I feel about both that could be an insult

USC - UW is the people's choice and how the league actually played out on the field

Embarrassing.

Whittingham said it best about people crying that they "backed into" the CCG. 'We beat the people we needed to beat.' Your dogs shit the bed at 2-7 ASU. uw fans like to pretend that didn't happen. Utah beat SC. uw doesn't deserve to be there. Go enjoy the RB, your team wasn't beating SC. That takes a team that plays D.

LOL......................................

 

[RaceBannon]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

So making the College Football Playoff which only two Pac teams have done it (one of a top Oregon teams in school history) doesn't count for doing anything. It's not anyone's fault the current college system is this way.

UW and Oregon had the same season to you, UW with more wins and more wins against ranked teams, including one which was #6 in the country on the road, is the same as Oregon's limp dick season with a lone good win over 9 win UCLA. Utah is barely even worth acknowledging. Both at home.

You do you Mike.

Just don't call anyone else a loser fan because you are the epitome of the loser quook serving me beer in Portland.

It’s god damned astonishing that in the same breath where you try to advocate for a great UW season, you say Utah’s season isn’t worth mentioning.

Once you figure out why you’re saying “Utah isn’t worth mentioning” you’ll figure out why I’m saying it about UW.

I posted elsewhere that the only fan bases happy with the fucked up Pac 12 this year are Utah and Oregon

Considering how I feel about both that could be an insult

USC - UW is the people's choice and how the league actually played out on the field

Not even close to true. You’re only applying your “Beat Oregon, nothing else matters” criteria.

Same league record. You both lost to UCLA. You both beat OSU, You split ASU, you split Oregon, they beat USC.

They had by far the tougher SOS. They are only behind USC, by 1 pt., for avg. margin of victory (8th in the county). UW is 3rd league and 17th country (with a much easier schedule)

Nobody outside of Cambridge, WA gives a single fuck about UW not being in it.

The league played division schedules and UW won one and Utah finished 2nd in one

UW did win at Autzen and Utah couldn't beat a crippled Blo Nix

And of course 10-2 is better than 9-3

UW belongs in the game and you know it, I know it and the American people know it

The nation wants Williams v Penix. Not some MWC reject

But thanks for proving my point that duck fans are united with utes in an axis of evil

 

[MikeSeaver]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

So making the College Football Playoff which only two Pac teams have done it (one of a top Oregon teams in school history) doesn't count for doing anything. It's not anyone's fault the current college system is this way.

UW and Oregon had the same season to you, UW with more wins and more wins against ranked teams, including one which was #6 in the country on the road, is the same as Oregon's limp dick season with a lone good win over 9 win UCLA. Utah is barely even worth acknowledging. Both at home.

You do you Mike.

Just don't call anyone else a loser fan because you are the epitome of the loser quook serving me beer in Portland.

It’s god damned astonishing that in the same breath where you try to advocate for a great UW season, you say Utah’s season isn’t worth mentioning.

Once you figure out why you’re saying “Utah isn’t worth mentioning” you’ll figure out why I’m saying it about UW.

I posted elsewhere that the only fan bases happy with the fucked up Pac 12 this year are Utah and Oregon

Considering how I feel about both that could be an insult

USC - UW is the people's choice and how the league actually played out on the field

Not even close to true. You’re only applying your “Beat Oregon, nothing else matters” criteria.

Same league record. You both lost to UCLA. You both beat OSU, You split ASU, you split Oregon, they beat USC.

They had by far the tougher SOS. They are only behind USC, by 1 pt., for avg. margin of victory (8th in the county). UW is 3rd league and 17th country (with a much easier schedule)

Nobody outside of Cambridge, WA gives a single fuck about UW not being in it.

The league played division schedules and UW won one and Utah finished 2nd in one

UW did win at Autzen and Utah couldn't beat a crippled Blo Nix

And of course 10-2 is better than 9-3

UW belongs in the game and you know it, I know it and the American people know it

The nation wants Williams v Penix. Not some MWC reject

But thanks for proving my point that duck fans are united with utes in an axis of evil

“Everyone says so” post of the day.

You’ve been rooting for everyone else besides Oregon for 30 years. I get to be a #myutes fan for 1.

 

[RaceBannon]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

So making the College Football Playoff which only two Pac teams have done it (one of a top Oregon teams in school history) doesn't count for doing anything. It's not anyone's fault the current college system is this way.

UW and Oregon had the same season to you, UW with more wins and more wins against ranked teams, including one which was #6 in the country on the road, is the same as Oregon's limp dick season with a lone good win over 9 win UCLA. Utah is barely even worth acknowledging. Both at home.

You do you Mike.

Just don't call anyone else a loser fan because you are the epitome of the loser quook serving me beer in Portland.

It’s god damned astonishing that in the same breath where you try to advocate for a great UW season, you say Utah’s season isn’t worth mentioning.

Once you figure out why you’re saying “Utah isn’t worth mentioning” you’ll figure out why I’m saying it about UW.

I posted elsewhere that the only fan bases happy with the fucked up Pac 12 this year are Utah and Oregon

Considering how I feel about both that could be an insult

USC - UW is the people's choice and how the league actually played out on the field

Embarrassing.

Whittingham said it best about people crying that they "backed into" the CCG. 'We beat the people we needed to beat.' Your dogs shit the bed at 2-7 ASU. uw fans like to pretend that didn't happen. Utah beat SC. uw doesn't deserve to be there. Go enjoy the RB, your team wasn't beating SC. That takes a team that plays D.

LOL......................................

UW beat the teams they needed to beat as well

Whitlessham can suck dick

 

[46XiJCAB]

LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.
View attachment 53824

You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.

Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

Did any of you actually graduate from UW?

North champs again.

Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.

Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.

You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.

We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

Did you study theater or something?

37-34

It was all over the internet

You lost and you get 2nd place

Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing

I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.

“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.

I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.

Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?

What is the problem here?

Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.

Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.

There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road.

I would trade a spot to possibly backdoor into the Rose Bowl. I mean why not? Guess who’d be the first group of long time, generational losers to come over here and remind Oregon fans how they got there? It has nothing to do with who we lost to. I don’t care about “who we lose to” and have made that clear over the years I’ve wasted on here.

I am a college football atheist. I only care about the end result. Not how we got there.

You all just happen to be here. So, It’s my job, for now, to remind you you’ve done nothing for 30 years except that one time vs 8-3 #14 Purdue, over 20 years ago.

So let’s talk about whom wants to trade places with whom. You can have this year, I’ll take the previous 25.

So making the College Football Playoff which only two Pac teams have done it (one of a top Oregon teams in school history) doesn't count for doing anything. It's not anyone's fault the current college system is this way.

UW and Oregon had the same season to you, UW with more wins and more wins against ranked teams, including one which was #6 in the country on the road, is the same as Oregon's limp dick season with a lone good win over 9 win UCLA. Utah is barely even worth acknowledging. Both at home.

You do you Mike.

Just don't call anyone else a loser fan because you are the epitome of the loser quook serving me beer in Portland.

It’s god damned astonishing that in the same breath where you try to advocate for a great UW season, you say Utah’s season isn’t worth mentioning.

Once you figure out why you’re saying “Utah isn’t worth mentioning” you’ll figure out why I’m saying it about UW.

I posted elsewhere that the only fan bases happy with the fucked up Pac 12 this year are Utah and Oregon

Considering how I feel about both that could be an insult

USC - UW is the people's choice and how the league actually played out on the field

Not even close to true. You’re only applying your “Beat Oregon, nothing else matters” criteria.

Same league record. You both lost to UCLA. You both beat OSU, You split ASU, you split Oregon, they beat USC.

They had by far the tougher SOS. They are only behind USC, by 1 pt., for avg. margin of victory (8th in the county). UW is 3rd league and 17th country (with a much easier schedule)

Nobody outside of Cambridge, WA gives a single fuck about UW not being in it.

The league played division schedules and UW won one and Utah finished 2nd in one

UW did win at Autzen and Utah couldn't beat a crippled Blo Nix

And of course 10-2 is better than 9-3

UW belongs in the game and you know it, I know it and the American people know it

The nation wants Williams v Penix. Not some MWC reject

But thanks for proving my point that duck fans are united with utes in an axis of evil

The nation doesn't knows who uw is. HTH.

Me: Siri, "what two PAC-12 schools did ASU defeat this year?"

Siri: "Colorado and uw."

Me: LOLOLOLOLOLO...............................