Wyoming for the win! We need more of this

Pitchfork51 said:
EverettChris said:
HHusky said:
No mystery why folks shouldn't look to the Tug for serious engagement.
Click to expand...
You’ve been a clown to be laughter at, not laughed with, for years, Bozo.
I’ve always enjoyed when you try to get the hamster wheel running in your mind and and be serious for a post. It has not once worked out well for you.
Click to expand...
Ive never understood what he gets out of it. It's so weird. Must be like a compulsion or something
Click to expand...
He's just killing time until Aunt Charlies bar opens down the street.
 
HHusky said:
In Griswold, the Supreme Court rejected a Connecticut state law that banned the use of birth control by married couples. (Yes, really.) The court reasoned that “specific guarantees in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights have penumbras … where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion.” There is the First Amendment’s rights to express your religious and political beliefs and to freely associate with others; the Third Amendment’s right to privacy in one’s own home by refusing to house soldiers during peacetime; the Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government; the Fifth Amendment’s right against self-incrimination; and the Ninth Amendment’s preservation of other individual rights, regardless of whether they are mentioned in the Constitution.
Taken together, the Supreme Court concluded, the protections in the Bill of Rights meant the Founders believed there is a “right to be let alone.”
Conservative legal heroes such as Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas hate this. Each has explicitly argued that the right to privacy is not a constitutional right because the Founders did not did not explicitly say there’s one. In 2007, Justice Thomas wrote that there is “no general right to privacy” or relevant liberty in the U.S. Constitution. Justice Scalia, in the same https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-102 case, spoke disparagingly of the “so-called ‘right to privacy.’”

I have been reading many of you gals parroting Scalia and Thomas on this issue for more than 20 years. Today you celebrate a judge’s ruling based upon the same rights you would claim don’t exist in other contexts. Hypocrisy? Absolutely. Yours.
Click to expand...
Just curious. How do you feel about liberals forcing people to follow their religion? Politically correct bs. Forcing employees to sit through "white privilege re-education" in the workplace? Forcing little girls to use the bathroom or shower with full grown men? Colleges flunking students who disagree with liberal doctrine? Forcing people to file applications for jobs that ask questions about their beliefs about transgender or other far left bullchit. Your liberal religion is penalizing people who think differently than you. Its disgusting and completely un-American and corrupt.
The list can go on and on. You are such a hypocrite.
 
Still waiting for a rational conservative to call this shit out. Even a downthumb would pass muster. This passive acceptance of Sled, Bend, WestLinn, Pitchfork, Throb, Everett, etc, tells me all I need to know about the people who don't call them out. Let's get it together, boys.
 
Last edited:
To add, there's no shame in hating someone who in theory stands for your party. I hate HH. He's a dog killer and I hate who he is, based on provided evidence.
Take my lead. This ain't hard. I hate people for who they are, not their political affiliation. Try it sometime.
If that hate is towards Big Ern, he accepts. We are all just stardust anyway.
 
Last edited:
CallMeBigErn said:
To add, there's no shame in hating someone who in theory stands for your party. I hate HH. He's a dog killer and I hate who he is, based on provided evidence.
Take my lead. This ain't hard. I hate people for who they are, not their political affiliation. Try it sometime.
If that hate is towards Big Ern, he accepts. We are all just stardust anyway.
Click to expand...
This is thunderdome. We've all fought over shit for years. H has a talent for uniting the right however. Much like the current administration.
Also, if you think abusing the shit out of title 9 is going to be a wedge issue you are dead wrong. Start an abortion thread and make popcorn.
 
Bendintheriver said:
HHusky said:
In Griswold, the Supreme Court rejected a Connecticut state law that banned the use of birth control by married couples. (Yes, really.) The court reasoned that “specific guarantees in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights have penumbras … where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion.” There is the First Amendment’s rights to express your religious and political beliefs and to freely associate with others; the Third Amendment’s right to privacy in one’s own home by refusing to house soldiers during peacetime; the Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government; the Fifth Amendment’s right against self-incrimination; and the Ninth Amendment’s preservation of other individual rights, regardless of whether they are mentioned in the Constitution.
Taken together, the Supreme Court concluded, the protections in the Bill of Rights meant the Founders believed there is a “right to be let alone.”
Conservative legal heroes such as Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas hate this. Each has explicitly argued that the right to privacy is not a constitutional right because the Founders did not did not explicitly say there’s one. In 2007, Justice Thomas wrote that there is “no general right to privacy” or relevant liberty in the U.S. Constitution. Justice Scalia, in the same https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-102 case, spoke disparagingly of the “so-called ‘right to privacy.’”

I have been reading many of you gals parroting Scalia and Thomas on this issue for more than 20 years. Today you celebrate a judge’s ruling based upon the same rights you would claim don’t exist in other contexts. Hypocrisy? Absolutely. Yours.
Click to expand...
Just curious. How do you feel about liberals forcing people to follow their religion? Politically correct bs. Forcing employees to sit through "white privilege re-education" in the workplace? Forcing little girls to use the bathroom or shower with full grown men? Colleges flunking students who disagree with liberal doctrine? Forcing people to file applications for jobs that ask questions about their beliefs about transgender or other far left bullchit. Your liberal religion is penalizing people who think differently than you. Its disgusting and completely un-American and corrupt.
The list can go on and on. You are such a hypocrite.
Click to expand...
He doesn't support any of those positions he just votes for people who do.
 
Swaye said:
Bendintheriver said:
HHusky said:
In Griswold, the Supreme Court rejected a Connecticut state law that banned the use of birth control by married couples. (Yes, really.) The court reasoned that “specific guarantees in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights have penumbras … where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion.” There is the First Amendment’s rights to express your religious and political beliefs and to freely associate with others; the Third Amendment’s right to privacy in one’s own home by refusing to house soldiers during peacetime; the Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government; the Fifth Amendment’s right against self-incrimination; and the Ninth Amendment’s preservation of other individual rights, regardless of whether they are mentioned in the Constitution.
Taken together, the Supreme Court concluded, the protections in the Bill of Rights meant the Founders believed there is a “right to be let alone.”
Conservative legal heroes such as Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas hate this. Each has explicitly argued that the right to privacy is not a constitutional right because the Founders did not did not explicitly say there’s one. In 2007, Justice Thomas wrote that there is “no general right to privacy” or relevant liberty in the U.S. Constitution. Justice Scalia, in the same https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-102 case, spoke disparagingly of the “so-called ‘right to privacy.’”

I have been reading many of you gals parroting Scalia and Thomas on this issue for more than 20 years. Today you celebrate a judge’s ruling based upon the same rights you would claim don’t exist in other contexts. Hypocrisy? Absolutely. Yours.
Click to expand...
Just curious. How do you feel about liberals forcing people to follow their religion? Politically correct bs. Forcing employees to sit through "white privilege re-education" in the workplace? Forcing little girls to use the bathroom or shower with full grown men? Colleges flunking students who disagree with liberal doctrine? Forcing people to file applications for jobs that ask questions about their beliefs about transgender or other far left bullchit. Your liberal religion is penalizing people who think differently than you. Its disgusting and completely un-American and corrupt.
The list can go on and on. You are such a hypocrite.
Click to expand...
He doesn't support any of those positions he just votes for people who do.
Click to expand...
I’m still for not surrendering to Russia and for not increasing deficits through reckless tax cuts, but you do you, Squanto.
STILL no brave TugCon wants to acknowledge that the decision being celebrated is based on rights you claim do not exist. Imagine my surprise.
 
CallMeBigErn said:
To add, there's no shame in hating someone who in theory stands for your party. I hate HH. He's a dog killer and I hate who he is, based on provided evidence.
Take my lead. This ain't hard. I hate people for who they are, not their political affiliation. Try it sometime.
If that hate is towards Big Ern, he accepts. We are all just stardust anyway.
Click to expand...
I would kill most doodles. No point in denying it.
 
Last edited:
Bendintheriver said:
HHusky said:
In Griswold, the Supreme Court rejected a Connecticut state law that banned the use of birth control by married couples. (Yes, really.) The court reasoned that “specific guarantees in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights have penumbras … where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion.” There is the First Amendment’s rights to express your religious and political beliefs and to freely associate with others; the Third Amendment’s right to privacy in one’s own home by refusing to house soldiers during peacetime; the Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government; the Fifth Amendment’s right against self-incrimination; and the Ninth Amendment’s preservation of other individual rights, regardless of whether they are mentioned in the Constitution.
Taken together, the Supreme Court concluded, the protections in the Bill of Rights meant the Founders believed there is a “right to be let alone.”
Conservative legal heroes such as Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas hate this. Each has explicitly argued that the right to privacy is not a constitutional right because the Founders did not did not explicitly say there’s one. In 2007, Justice Thomas wrote that there is “no general right to privacy” or relevant liberty in the U.S. Constitution. Justice Scalia, in the same https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-102 case, spoke disparagingly of the “so-called ‘right to privacy.’”

I have been reading many of you gals parroting Scalia and Thomas on this issue for more than 20 years. Today you celebrate a judge’s ruling based upon the same rights you would claim don’t exist in other contexts. Hypocrisy? Absolutely. Yours.
Click to expand...
Just curious. How do you feel about liberals forcing people to follow their religion? Politically correct bs. Forcing employees to sit through "white privilege re-education" in the workplace? Forcing little girls to use the bathroom or shower with full grown men? Colleges flunking students who disagree with liberal doctrine? Forcing people to file applications for jobs that ask questions about their beliefs about transgender or other far left bullchit. Your liberal religion is penalizing people who think differently than you. Its disgusting and completely un-American and corrupt.
The list can go on and on. You are such a hypocrite.
Click to expand...
I'm as sick of the "wokes" on every topic as you are. But you stupid as fuck reactionaries are the ones who decided to tack to the right-hand edge of the world and brought the equally stupid as fuck leftists out of the woodwork. I warned you that was going to be the result 15 years ago when the TEA party nonsense became a thing in one of the lowest tax environments we'd seen in a century. You girls gave us the fucking wokes because politics is physics, and every action has an opposite and equal reaction.
 
You voting to give your betters a(nother) tax cut is much appreciated by me, Race. I'm one of them.
 
Day Three of a 4-day Hate America weekend going about as I thought it would be for H.
You can feel the seething in his posts about others being happy and with family while he’s clutching to the belief that Joe can turn it around.
 
Fern's vagina has gotten sandy. I'm an American not a communist. Communism has absolutely no place in this country. None.
 
HHusky said:
Bendintheriver said:
HHusky said:
In Griswold, the Supreme Court rejected a Connecticut state law that banned the use of birth control by married couples. (Yes, really.) The court reasoned that “specific guarantees in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights have penumbras … where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion.” There is the First Amendment’s rights to express your religious and political beliefs and to freely associate with others; the Third Amendment’s right to privacy in one’s own home by refusing to house soldiers during peacetime; the Fourth Amendment’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government; the Fifth Amendment’s right against self-incrimination; and the Ninth Amendment’s preservation of other individual rights, regardless of whether they are mentioned in the Constitution.
Taken together, the Supreme Court concluded, the protections in the Bill of Rights meant the Founders believed there is a “right to be let alone.”
Conservative legal heroes such as Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas hate this. Each has explicitly argued that the right to privacy is not a constitutional right because the Founders did not did not explicitly say there’s one. In 2007, Justice Thomas wrote that there is “no general right to privacy” or relevant liberty in the U.S. Constitution. Justice Scalia, in the same https://www.oyez.org/cases/2002/02-102 case, spoke disparagingly of the “so-called ‘right to privacy.’”

I have been reading many of you gals parroting Scalia and Thomas on this issue for more than 20 years. Today you celebrate a judge’s ruling based upon the same rights you would claim don’t exist in other contexts. Hypocrisy? Absolutely. Yours.
Click to expand...
Just curious. How do you feel about liberals forcing people to follow their religion? Politically correct bs. Forcing employees to sit through "white privilege re-education" in the workplace? Forcing little girls to use the bathroom or shower with full grown men? Colleges flunking students who disagree with liberal doctrine? Forcing people to file applications for jobs that ask questions about their beliefs about transgender or other far left bullchit. Your liberal religion is penalizing people who think differently than you. Its disgusting and completely un-American and corrupt.
The list can go on and on. You are such a hypocrite.
Click to expand...
I'm as sick of the "wokes" on every topic as you are. But you stupid as fuck reactionaries are the ones who decided to tack to the right-hand edge of the world and brought the equally stupid as fuck leftists out of the woodwork. I warned you that was going to be the result 15 years ago when the TEA party nonsense became a thing in one of the lowest tax environments we'd seen in a century. You girls gave us the fucking wokes because politics is physics, and every action has an opposite and equal reaction.
Click to expand...
🤣 the left is a result of the tea party not liberals going off the deep end and raising a generation of communists. Fucking gold Jerry. Gold.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top