Would you be content with a Brett Bielema-esque run for Petersen?

Gladstone

Gladstone

New Fish


Year Team Overall Conference Standing Bowl/playoffs Coaches# AP°
Wisconsin Badgers (Big Ten Conference) (2006–2012)
2006 Wisconsin 12–1 7-1 T–2nd W Capitol One 5 7
2007 Wisconsin 9–4 5–3 T–4th L Outback 21 24
2008 Wisconsin 7–6 3–5 T–6th L Champs Sports
2009 Wisconsin 10–3 5–3 T–4th W Champs Sports 16 16
2010 Wisconsin 11–2 7–1 T–1st L Rose† 8 7
2011 Wisconsin 11–3 6–2 1st (Leaders) L Rose† 11 10
2012 Wisconsin 8–5 4–4 3rd (Leaders)* Rose‡† 23‡
Wisconsin: 68–24 37–19 ‡Did not coach bowl game.
 
This sounds spoiled but no. No BCS wins during that stretch. I mean this is Washington after all so winning a Rose Bowl/BCS game should still be the standard.

This isn't WSU where just making it to a Rose Bowl is defined as success.
 
If you told me today that we'd be in 3 Rose Bowls over the next 7 years, I'd take that ...

Of course, winning at least a single Rose Bowl would be important.
 
Flagged for using Bret Bielema in a shit tier Big Ten as a reference.

We don't want Petersen imitating Bielema moving from a shit tier conference to a REAL conference.
 
Last edited:
Hell and NO and it's not even an option.

I'm up late and want to post in the chat with Coach Petersen on the Seattle Times but there is no way I will be able to stay up until 5am. Anyone willing to post a message to Coach Pete for me?
 
Last edited:
Hell and NO and it's not ever an option.

I'm up late and want to post in the chat with Coach Petersen on the Seattle Times but there is no way I will be able to stay up until 5am. Anyone willing to post a message to Coach Pete for me?
Click to expand...

Of all the days for me to have lunch plans...otherwise I would be the PERFECT choice to post on your behalf.

fourth

 
? Why am I getting flagged. I didn't say I would be content with that level of success. Just wanted discussion during a time when it seems like the same 3 posters circle jerk over the porn threads and the rest of the forum is dead.
 
? Why am I getting flagged. I didn't say I would be content with that level of success. Just wanted discussion during a time when it seems like the same 3 posters circle jerk over the porn threads and the rest of the forum is dead.
Click to expand...

Flagged for using Bret Bielema in a shit tier Big Ten as a reference.

We don't want Petersen imitating Bielema moving from a shit tier conference to a REAL conference.
 
? Why am I getting flagged. I didn't say I would be content with that level of success. Just wanted discussion during a time when it seems like the same 3 posters circle jerk over the porn threads and the rest of the forum is dead.
Click to expand...

Are you saying Sven is annoying or something?
 
? Why am I getting flagged. I didn't say I would be content with that level of success. Just wanted discussion during a time when it seems like the same 3 posters circle jerk over the porn threads and the rest of the forum is dead.
Click to expand...

Why do you care if you get flagged or not? What has flagging poasts on this site ever done?
 
Hell and NO and it's not ever an option.

I'm up late and want to post in the chat with Coach Petersen on the Seattle Times but there is no way I will be able to stay up until 5am. Anyone willing to post a message to Coach Pete for me?
Click to expand...

Of all the days for me to have lunch plans...otherwise I would be the PERFECT choice to post on your behalf.

fourth
Click to expand...

May 29th, 2014- The Seattle Times has received a record number of lemon party links disguised as chat questions. The submitter is unknown, but the IP addressed has been traced to the greater Portland area.
 
Hell and NO and it's not ever an option.

I'm up late and want to post in the chat with Coach Petersen on the Seattle Times but there is no way I will be able to stay up until 5am. Anyone willing to post a message to Coach Pete for me?
Click to expand...

Of all the days for me to have lunch plans...otherwise I would be the PERFECT choice to post on your behalf.

fourth
Click to expand...

May 29th, 2014- The Seattle Times has received a record number of lemon party links disguised as chat questions. The submitter is unknown, but the IP addressed has been traced to the greater Bangkok area.
Click to expand...

Proxies man.
 
Yeah I retract my butthurt comment about being flagged. Dumb comment. Long day at work.

Anyway if 2 of those Rose Bowl losses became a W I'd probably take that scenario.
 
Brett Bulimia was handicapped by having Alvarez as his AD.

That would be like living with your in laws.

Of course he needed Alvarez to be successful.

He is in way over his head at Arkansas and will be at a Big 12 or ACC school in 3 years.
 
I did love their offense and would really like if UW somehow emulated that kind of play. Give me Wisconsin or Stanford smashmouth style any day.
 
Last edited:
I did love their offense and would really like if UW somehow emulated that kind of play. Give me Wisconsin or Stanford smashmouth style any day.
Click to expand...

Just give me wins. If pro style produces wins then so be it, if the spread produces wins then so be it. If the pistol produces wins then so be it too.

Also whatever you run stick to it and believe in it. Don't be like Sark where you say your outdated offense will stand the test of time then change that offense a year later.
 
OP since I'm still up and this thread is entertaining let me chime in here.

1) you have had enough time to edit your original post without the ¥£€ type typos to understand the entire post.

2) if you liked Sark just own your feeling

3) no shit if those RB L's turn to W's we would change our stance

4) crying about flagging is so yesterday, grow some balls man. Wow just wow
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top