worth a thousand words

I love these examples where people who always cry for state's rights and against federal regulation/intervention (Roe, public lands, fuckin Ammon Bundy, etc) immediately turn against state's rights when it doesn't suit them. Colorado's insurrection clause ballot challenge being a good example. Whether it was a good case or not is irrelevant. It's the political narrative. There's better examples than that one.
Let the state's decide!
Nonono, that's not what we meant!
Hypocrisy in spades.

image.png

Bey dumb fuck, I asked how Democrats removing Trump from ballots “Protects Democracy” for a federal election. Your states’ rights gibberish is just stupid in response to the question asked of you.
States didn't, "Democrats" didn't, and the Supreme Court didn't.
Neeeeeeext.
 
I love these examples where people who always cry for state's rights and against federal regulation/intervention (Roe, public lands, fuckin Ammon Bundy, etc) immediately turn against state's rights when it doesn't suit them. Colorado's insurrection clause ballot challenge being a good example. Whether it was a good case or not is irrelevant. It's the political narrative. There's better examples than that one.
Let the state's decide!
Nonono, that's not what we meant!
Hypocrisy in spades.

image.png

Bey dumb fuck, I asked how Democrats removing Trump from ballots “Protects Democracy” for a federal election. Your states’ rights gibberish is just stupid in response to the question asked of you.
States didn't, "Democrats" didn't, and the Supreme Court didn't.
Neeeeeeext.
You might be an even bigger liar than HHusky. But you’re “Defending Democracy” in your delusional mind. A blatant liar with a surface layer of knowledge. That’s you.
n Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court reached a 9-0 decision to side with Trump and overturned a decision by the Colorado Supreme Court that the former president should be removed from the state's ballot in the 2024 election for his alleged role in the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

Democrats eye new way to get Trump off ballot after Supreme Court loss
 
Last edited:
I love these examples where people who always cry for state's rights and against federal regulation/intervention (Roe, public lands, fuckin Ammon Bundy, etc) immediately turn against state's rights when it doesn't suit them. Colorado's insurrection clause ballot challenge being a good example. Whether it was a good case or not is irrelevant. It's the political narrative. There's better examples than that one.
Let the state's decide!
Nonono, that's not what we meant!
Hypocrisy in spades.

image.png

Bey dumb fuck, I asked how Democrats removing Trump from ballots “Protects Democracy” for a federal election. Your states’ rights gibberish is just stupid in response to the question asked of you.
States didn't, "Democrats" didn't, and the Supreme Court didn't.
Neeeeeeext.
You might be an even bigger liar than HHusky. But you’re “Defending Democracy” in your delusional mind. A blatant liar with a surface layer of knowledge. That’s you.
n Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-trump-colorado-ballot-ruling-raises-important-question-congress-insurrection-honig-1875680 to side with Trump and overturned a decision by the Colorado Supreme Court that the former president should be removed from the state's ballot in the 2024 election for his alleged role in the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

Democrats eye new way to get Trump off ballot after Supreme Court loss
Don't know what you're on about anymore. I yield the remainder of my time.
 
Last edited:
img-5307.jpeg


Maybe stepping out of your DNC/MSM silo and pay fucking attention.

You won’t because you don’t have the brass.

.
 
Back
Top