All this protesting over a metaphor? Finding idiots to protest is like shooting fish in a barrel.
“No Kings” is fucking stupid and the idiots at the rallies get stumped trying to explain what it means. At least BLM had a more straightforward message.Metaphors are hard.
Liberals would never be in favor of jailing political opponents, or censoring public discourse, but that’s basically the Democrat platform as far as I can tell. That and finally admitting they care about illegals even more than they care about us taxpayers funding theirs and their donors’ rich lives.No Kings is retarded 1984 doublethink. Same bullshit they tried with 'safe and effective', 'trust the science', 'mostly peaceful protests'.
Except the dumbfucks in the Democratic party really fell for it when the commies co-opted 'liberals'.
Tuff liberals were a good thing for 200 years.
I have to explain this because you are too stupid to understand that we aren't actually talking about a guy in a crown. It's the concentration of power in a single person that the framers tried to prevent. But you have your stupid comeback.Its a metaphor guys!!!111!!!
Presidential power got neutered to a level lower than the constitution actually provides in the 70’s. Rule by unelected bureaucracy is far more dystopian than rule by elected executive.I have to explain this because you are too stupid to understand that we aren't actually talking about a guy in a crown. It's the concentration of power in a single person that the framers tried to prevent. But you have your stupid comeback.
Never fuck with the mounted unit. Those horses are trained to smack people around. One of the funnier things I saw was a crook fleeing on foot at full speed get smacked by the horse and him going ass over tea kettle. Also note the long baton for the traditional wood shampoo!
Straw man pretty muchPresidential power got neutered to a level lower than the constitution actually provides in the 70’s. Rule by unelected bureaucracy is far more dystopian than rule by elected executive.
First NaziI have to explain this because you are too stupid to understand that we aren't actually talking about a guy in a crown. It's the concentration of power in a single person that the framers tried to prevent. But you have your stupid comeback.
Not really. You want a faceless Politburo to rule. It’s pretty obvious.Straw man pretty much
And the $30 car tabs the voters voted for.Bob Ferguson and his unconstitutional income tax are laughing at the no king retards
We are dealing with morons like @CallMeBigErn who have strong feelings that Trump is a Nazi Fascist King and like to get together with hundreds of other white ShitLibs to sing dumb protest songs and seek publicity.So the King who keeps getting injunctions against his policies is really just centralizing his power. Makes sense.
Trump’s first administration faced 64 injunctions out of the total 127 nationwide injunctions issued since 1963. There were 32 injunctions issued against the Bush, Obama and Biden administrations collectively since 2001, meaning the first Trump administration was on the receiving end of double the amount of nationwide injunctions than his two predecessors and successor combined, according to the April 2024 edition of the Harvard Law Review.
Even worse, now the King is begging, Nay, Appealing to judges. How very non Kingly
Trump filed an emergency appeal Thursday asking the Supreme Court to narrow three injunctions that were issued to halt Trump’s nullification of birthright citizenship. The emergency appeal requests the injunction only cover individuals directly impacted by the relevant courts.