Will Washington be extra motivated to beat USC this season?

[puppylove_sugarsteel]

Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.

After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.

Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.

 

[Gladstone]

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

 

[BallSacked]

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.

Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.

This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.

I think UW will keep it competitive.

 

[RoadDawg55]

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.

Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.

This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.

I think UW will keep it competitive.

USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.

The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.

 

[puppylove_sugarsteel]

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.

Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.

This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.

I think UW will keep it competitive.

Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)

 

[Dardanus]

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.

Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.

This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.

I think UW will keep it competitive.

USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.

The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.

You mean like the Boston College game?

 

[BallSacked]

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.

Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.

This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.

I think UW will keep it competitive.

USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.

The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.

Fair assessment. I don't think they will end up better than last year. So that's an 8-4 type team. I would think UW will be around a TD underdog. Unless UW is an absolute dumpster fire, I don't think it'll be a plungering. Talent is a problem but coaching, especially with an extra 5 days prep, will narrow that gap.

Last year's thursday night home game SC didn't manage to put away Cal. Cal almost made a big comeback even though SC brought out the shiny helmets and a new velvet curtain for the Coliseum tunnel. I see a similar type game happening, where SC very likely wins but UW hangs within 7-10 pts the entire game.

 

[puppylove_sugarsteel]

.

 

[BallSacked]

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.

Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.

This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.

I think UW will keep it competitive.

Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)

You can save deez nuts in your mouth. Oh never mind, you're too busy tongue-punching Sark's fartbox, again.

 

[GrundleStiltzkin]

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.

Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.

This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.

I think UW will keep it competitive.

Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)

Puppylove_SugarSteve strikes again.

 

[puppylove_sugarsteel]

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.

Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.

This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.

I think UW will keep it competitive.

Save this post ballbag then. Put your money where your cunt is. USC 42-UW 6 (21 was tongue-in-cheek)

You can save deez nuts in your mouth. Oh never mind, you're too busy tongue-punching Sark's fartbox, again.

Shaking head in disbelief. At least Tomas isnt trying to be funny

 

[PurpleJ]

Nil-nil draw IMO

 

[whatshouldicareabout]

The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.

Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.

That should be the difference in the game.

 

[RoadDawg55]

The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.

Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.

That should be the difference in the game.

Obviously there is no way to know until the game is actually played, but this is an insane "I hope" type of post.

 

[puppylove_sugarsteel]

The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.

Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.

That should be the difference in the game.

Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.

Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.

Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali .

 

[BallSacked]

The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.

Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.

That should be the difference in the game.

Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.

Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.

Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali .

SC didn't beat any Pac12 team by more than 28 points last year, you fucktard. They beat the coogs by 27 and Colorado by 28.

Stop dreaming of getting Eiffel Tower'd by Sark and Cody McDreamy and think logically for once in your miserable life.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.

Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand It

Would WTF but don't want to bury it.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

But how is sugarsteve a Sark homer?

 

[PostGameOrangeSlices]

Listen Peter Beaters, I've been on the Peterman train since the beggining. But Sark has too much talent on his roster. Give Petey a few more years and him and Sark will be fighting for the Pac yearly. Oh and Freeme, J, Boobie, stick to ice skating because football is for the real men like me and the Fire Marshal, okay boys? ; ))))

 

[DerekJohnson]

Listen Peter Beaters, I've been on the Peterman train since the beggining. But Sark has too much talent on his roster. Give Petey a few more years and him and Sark will be fighting for the Pac yearly. Oh and Freeme, J, Boobie, stick to ice skating because football is for the real men like me and the Fire Marshal, okay boys? ; ))))

Should we start a Gulag/Ice Skating forum?