why does the NFL stand with France when they have a tragedy, but...

DerekJohnson

Administrator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
... when there is genocide in Uganda that claims 20,000 lives, the NFL is business as usual...
 
... when there is genocide in Uganda that claims 20,000 lives, the NFL is business as usual...

You could ask the same thing of the media. Hey, 20,000 Africans got murdered today. Um, ok, um, let's do a 10 second spot on it before we go for wall to wall Paris coverage for the next 48 hours.
 
White lives matter

Bingo

Is it really possible to evenly weigh all of the tragedies which happen around the world? Do the people complaining about Beirut not having new coverage even know what happened there, or that 140 people were killed in Kenya a day later.

This.

I've read a lot of comments like Derek's in the days since the Paris bombings, and while I think he and the "Don't Just Pray for Paris/Pray for the World" poem raise extremely good points, we have to remember people only have so much mental bandwidth.

What is a "fair amount" of coverage to give anything? For example, do bombing victims deserve more coverage than say, natural disaster victims? School shootings? How about people dying of hunger? Or heart disease? (I don't have an answer to that myself, just asking the question.)

 
Last edited:
White lives matter

That's part of it of course, but the biggest reason is that what's happening in Uganda could never happen here. But people/media/Mericans give such a shit about France because if it can happen to them it can happen here. And probably will, before much longer.
 
Last edited:
White lives matter

That's part of it of course, but the biggest reason is that what's happening in Uganda could never happen here. But people/media/Mericans give such a shit about France because if it can happen to them it can happen here. And probably will, before much longer.

This.
 
Back
Top