Who should LEAVE!

Who should leave?


  • Total voters
    16
Could Cream Puff go 10 & 2 twice? We'll never find out, but I suspect so if he does it once.

Actually, the Welfare Rat went 9 - 3 in 2001 including a bowl loss, his best. He had a couple of losing seasons before that. Cream Puff is at least mediocre....the Ty'ster wasn't fit to be a high school assistant.

As I've said (probably too often) there is zero hope that Cream Puff will produce anything but marginal teams. The heart of warrior is not something you can develop and learn in your 30s. You have it or you don't at his stage in life. Steve does not. His softness precludes being a warrior/fierce competitor.

However, if he's 10 - 2 this year, I'll eat massive amounts of crow and be happy to do so. 9 - 3 plus a bowl win will make me think twice about the grim outlook.

Fuck that. Sarks a mediocore coach. The stars could align and UW could have a bunch of good luck, like Ty did when he went 10-3 one year at Notre Dame, and Sark could get to 10 wins but that's no reason to eat crow. Ask yourself this, could you ever see a Sark led team winning 10 games in back to back seasons?

I know all you nega dawgs like to rewrite history and act like Ty was the worst coach ever but the truth is he was the definition of mediocore. That was the entire objection to him being hired.

0-12 was a complete debacle (and another 0-12 is clearly needed) and the majority of the blame is on Ty's shoulders but he's not the reason Locker got hurt and it wasn't his decision to bring back a lame duck coach. His career record without 0-12 is 76-76-1. Sark is Ty.
 
To me, this is the best case scenario:

Justin Wilcox becomes our defensive Chip Kelly.

We have a great season but it is because our D is top in the Pac while our Offense is somewhere in the middle (performing well when they need to with a little luck on our side). At the end of the year Sark,Woody, and everyone else see the writing on the wall. Sark, with the urging/blessing of the UW athletic department takes a job in the NFL. Wilcox is elevated to HC, Sirmon to DC, Tosh is given extra recruiting duties, Cozetto and Nansen are sent to the glue factory, Wilcox hires an OL coach and RB coach with recruiting/on the field results

Yeah...that's not going to happen.

Wilcox isn't that great. Neither is tosh.1

Wilcox could be great but we won't find out until he takes the DC job at some SEC school and wins a couple title games.

Holt could have been great too based on his usc time

Damone, stop with the bullshit. I'm all for coaches having to prove their worth, but Wilcox has a good track record at three different stops. Look at Tennessee's defense with him at the helm, and look at it without him. The drop off is astounding. Look at how he did at Boise. Look at the improvement at UW from Holt to him. The guy has been a success everywhere he has been.

He certainly has more to prove, and I do think it is very premature to talk about him being a possible replacement for Sark, but I'm glad we have him coaching the defense. It's been awhile since we had a quality dc.

 
Last edited:
To me, this is the best case scenario:

Justin Wilcox becomes our defensive Chip Kelly.

We have a great season but it is because our D is top in the Pac while our Offense is somewhere in the middle (performing well when they need to with a little luck on our side). At the end of the year Sark,Woody, and everyone else see the writing on the wall. Sark, with the urging/blessing of the UW athletic department takes a job in the NFL. Wilcox is elevated to HC, Sirmon to DC, Tosh is given extra recruiting duties, Cozetto and Nansen are sent to the glue factory, Wilcox hires an OL coach and RB coach with recruiting/on the field results

Yeah...that's not going to happen.

Wilcox isn't that great. Neither is tosh.1

Wilcox could be great but we won't find out until he takes the DC job at some SEC school and wins a couple title games.

Holt could have been great too based on his usc time

Damone, stop with the bullshit. I'm all for coaches having to prove their worth, but Wilcox has a good track record at three different stops. Look at Tennessee's defense with him at the helm, and look at it without him. The drop off is astounding. Look at how he did at Boise. Look at the improvement at UW from Holt to him. The guy has been a success everywhere he has been.

He certainly has more to prove, and I do think it is very premature to talk about him being a possible replacement for Sark, but I'm glad we have him coaching the defense. It's been awhile since we had a quality dc.

You think it's "premature" and he "certainly has more to prove"?

That's my point cuntwaffle.
 
To me, this is the best case scenario:

Justin Wilcox becomes our defensive Chip Kelly.

We have a great season but it is because our D is top in the Pac while our Offense is somewhere in the middle (performing well when they need to with a little luck on our side). At the end of the year Sark,Woody, and everyone else see the writing on the wall. Sark, with the urging/blessing of the UW athletic department takes a job in the NFL. Wilcox is elevated to HC, Sirmon to DC, Tosh is given extra recruiting duties, Cozetto and Nansen are sent to the glue factory, Wilcox hires an OL coach and RB coach with recruiting/on the field results

Yeah...that's not going to happen.

Wilcox isn't that great. Neither is tosh.1

Wilcox could be great but we won't find out until he takes the DC job at some SEC school and wins a couple title games.

Holt could have been great too based on his usc time

Damone, stop with the bullshit. I'm all for coaches having to prove their worth, but Wilcox has a good track record at three different stops. Look at Tennessee's defense with him at the helm, and look at it without him. The drop off is astounding. Look at how he did at Boise. Look at the improvement at UW from Holt to him. The guy has been a success everywhere he has been.

He certainly has more to prove, and I do think it is very premature to talk about him being a possible replacement for Sark, but I'm glad we have him coaching the defense. It's been awhile since we had a quality dc.

You think it's "premature" and he "certainly has more to prove"?

That's my point cuntwaffle.

I think it is pretty fucking stupid to act like Wilcox has been anything but a good coach. There is hard evidence at three different stops that show he has some coaching ability. Comparing him to Holt at USC is ridiculous.
 
To me, this is the best case scenario:

Justin Wilcox becomes our defensive Chip Kelly.

We have a great season but it is because our D is top in the Pac while our Offense is somewhere in the middle (performing well when they need to with a little luck on our side). At the end of the year Sark,Woody, and everyone else see the writing on the wall. Sark, with the urging/blessing of the UW athletic department takes a job in the NFL. Wilcox is elevated to HC, Sirmon to DC, Tosh is given extra recruiting duties, Cozetto and Nansen are sent to the glue factory, Wilcox hires an OL coach and RB coach with recruiting/on the field results

Yeah...that's not going to happen.

Wilcox isn't that great. Neither is tosh.1

Wilcox could be great but we won't find out until he takes the DC job at some SEC school and wins a couple title games.

Holt could have been great too based on his usc time

Damone, stop with the bullshit. I'm all for coaches having to prove their worth, but Wilcox has a good track record at three different stops. Look at Tennessee's defense with him at the helm, and look at it without him. The drop off is astounding. Look at how he did at Boise. Look at the improvement at UW from Holt to him. The guy has been a success everywhere he has been.

He certainly has more to prove, and I do think it is very premature to talk about him being a possible replacement for Sark, but I'm glad we have him coaching the defense. It's been awhile since we had a quality dc.

You think it's "premature" and he "certainly has more to prove"?

That's my point cuntwaffle.

I think it is pretty fucking stupid to act like Wilcox has been anything but a good coach. There is hard evidence at three different stops that show he has some coaching ability. Comparing him to Holt at USC is ridiculous.

I didn't say he wasn't a good coach. I said "isn't that great". Great > good. He has been good. I said at one point most people believed Holt was a great coach. The implication being, maybe it's premature elevate Wilcox to HC. Which you agreed with. Maybe I shouldn't be so subtle next time now that I know my audience may have problems with inference.
 
Last edited:
I'll volunteer to leave if you want

Why would you leave? Are you not entertained? With 5 total poasts on this website it's not like a lot of us fucktards would notice.

And BTW, who the fuck are you? (Obligatory)
 
I'll volunteer to leave if you want

Why would you leave? Are you not entertained? With 5 total poasts on this website it's not like a lot of us fucktards would notice.

And BTW, who the fuck are you? (Obligatory)

My feelings are hurt. I thought this place was classy. I'll be hanging out on the glassboard... lots of action there.
 
Back
Top