Who Develops Talent Best in the Pac-12?

https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Click to expand...

tenor.gif


Straightforward and awesome. Retweeted from my "positive" account. It seems to have gotten some attention. Great job DDY.
Click to expand...

Not sure how any of this could be useful for PSAs......
https://twitter.com/Jacob_Bandes/status/1070788807866368002
 
Last edited:
How many standard
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Click to expand...

tenor.gif


Straightforward and awesome. Retweeted from my "positive" account. It seems to have gotten some attention. Great job DDY.
Click to expand...

OH SHIT I JUST PASSED MY JUNIOR YEAR STATS CLASS!!!! WOOOOO!!!!
Click to expand...

That's actually part of what I love about it. I work with a lot of engineers that can't manage the principal of KISS to save their lives.

It also leaves a lot less room for people wishing to criticize your methodology. "But, but, but, [fill in cognitive bias]"
 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Click to expand...

It’s hard!
 
Who gets most wins out of their stars?
Click to expand...

WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?

Jesus fuck.

I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
 
Who gets most wins out of their stars?
Click to expand...

WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?

Jesus fuck.

I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
Click to expand...

I feel attacked
 
Who gets most wins out of their stars?
Click to expand...

WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?

Jesus fuck.

I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
Click to expand...

Sounds dangerously close to a Rule 1 violation against Faggot Hollowmen.
 
Who gets most wins out of their stars?
Click to expand...

WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?

Jesus fuck.

I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
Click to expand...

*nervously checks recent posting history*

 
Who gets most wins out of their stars?
Click to expand...

WHY DON'T YOU DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE AND FIND OUT?!!?

Jesus fuck.

I should ban anyone who - when someone posts something of substance - an idiot immediately asks him to do something else when they, themselves, have contributed nothing.
Click to expand...

Could you expand on this?
 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Click to expand...

Thanks for showing your work. I always assume everyone is an idiot. Works pretty well.

You're making assumptions about the relationship between recruiting rankings and all-conference teams so maybe you should see how that relationship holds up historically.

(*ducks*)
 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Click to expand...

Thanks for showing your work. I always assume everyone is an idiot. Works pretty well.

You're making assumptions about the relationship between recruiting rankings and all-conference teams so maybe you should see how that relationship holds up historically.

(*ducks*)
Click to expand...

giphy.gif

 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Click to expand...

Thanks for showing your work. I always assume everyone is an idiot. Works pretty well.

You're making assumptions about the relationship between recruiting rankings and all-conference teams so maybe you should see how that relationship holds up historically.

(*ducks*)
Click to expand...

You are banned.
 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Click to expand...

@roaddawg55 true?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top